Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Abiomed Inc. (NASDAQ:ABMD)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 3, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Economic Profit

Abiomed Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial trajectory between March 31, 2017, and March 31, 2022, reveals a period of significant value creation followed by a contraction in economic performance. While operational profitability grew substantially in the initial years, the subsequent expansion of the capital base eventually outpaced the growth in operating returns, leading to a decline in economic profit.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A strong growth trajectory is observed from 2017 to 2019, with NOPAT increasing from US$ 79,888 thousand to US$ 253,605 thousand. This figure remained relatively stable through 2021, reaching a peak of US$ 259,982 thousand. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2022, where NOPAT dropped to US$ 140,811 thousand, representing a significant reduction in operational earning power.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
Invested capital expanded aggressively and consistently from US$ 226,723 thousand in 2017 to a peak of US$ 737,876 thousand in 2021, before a slight contraction to US$ 693,367 thousand in 2022. Throughout this entire period, the cost of capital remained nearly constant, hovering between 21.75% and 21.82%. This indicates a stable hurdle rate against which the company's investments were measured.
Economic Profit Analysis
Economic profit exhibited a peak in 2019 at US$ 145,117 thousand. From 2020 to 2021, a downward trend emerged despite NOPAT remaining high; this suggests that the increasing volume of invested capital began to erode the surplus value created. The trend culminated in 2022 with the first instance of negative economic profit, totaling US$ -10,433 thousand. This transition to an economic loss indicates that the operating profit was insufficient to cover the cost of the capital employed.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Abiomed Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in product warranty4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.


Net Income
The net income demonstrates an overall increasing trend from 2017 to 2021, starting at 52,116 thousand US dollars in 2017 and more than quadrupling to 225,525 thousand US dollars by 2021. However, in the latest period reported (2022), net income declined significantly to 136,505 thousand US dollars, representing a reduction of approximately 39.5% compared to 2021. This sharp decrease after several years of growth may indicate emerging operational challenges or external factors impacting profitability.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT follows a similar upward pattern from 2017 to 2021, increasing from 79,888 thousand US dollars to a peak of 259,982 thousand US dollars in 2021. This progressive increase suggests improving operating efficiency and strong core profitability over this period. However, like net income, NOPAT experienced a noteworthy contraction in 2022, falling to 140,811 thousand US dollars, which constitutes a decrease of approximately 45.8% relative to 2021. The decrease in NOPAT correlates with the drop in net income, reinforcing the indication of decreased operational performance in the latest year.
Comparative Insights
Both profitability measures show consistent and substantial growth over the first five years reviewed, reflecting positive business momentum. The alignment in trends between net income and NOPAT suggests that the company’s profitability changes are primarily driven by operating activities rather than non-operating factors. The pronounced decline in 2022 in both metrics represents a notable deviation from prior periods, which warrants further investigation into causes such as market conditions, cost structure changes, or other external influences.

Cash Operating Taxes

Abiomed Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Income tax provision
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).


Income Tax Provision
The income tax provision fluctuates considerably over the period analyzed. It initially increased from 39,227 thousand US dollars in March 2017 to a peak of 48,267 thousand US dollars in March 2018. Subsequently, it sharply declined to 4,344 thousand US dollars in March 2019, indicating a significant reduction in tax liabilities or adjustments for that year. However, it rebounded markedly to 53,816 thousand US dollars in March 2020 and continued to rise to 62,695 thousand US dollars in March 2021 before decreasing again to 54,055 thousand US dollars in March 2022. This pattern suggests considerable variability likely influenced by changes in taxable income, tax planning strategies, or tax legislation.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes show an inconsistent but generally upward trend over the years. Starting at 13,626 thousand US dollars in March 2017, there is a notable decline to 5,738 thousand US dollars in March 2018. This is followed by a recovery to 12,089 thousand US dollars in March 2019. From March 2020 onwards, cash operating taxes consistently increase, reaching 20,943 thousand US dollars, 33,340 thousand US dollars in March 2021, and peaking at 51,674 thousand US dollars by March 2022. The sharp increase in recent years could reflect higher taxable operational earnings or timing differences between accounting income and tax payments.
Comparative Insights
The contrasting patterns between income tax provision and cash operating taxes are of note. While income tax provision shows extreme variability, cash operating taxes trend more steadily upwards after an initial decline. This discrepancy might indicate differences between accrued tax expenses and actual cash tax payments, possibly due to deferred tax assets or liabilities, tax credits, or changes in accounting estimates. The rise in cash taxes despite fluctuations in tax provision could imply a strengthening of the company's cash tax outflows in recent years.

Invested Capital

Abiomed Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Current portion of capital lease obligation
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenue4
Product warranty5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress8
Marketable securities9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of product warranty.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.

9 Subtraction of marketable securities.


The financial data over the six-year period reveals notable trends in the capital structure and equity position. There is a pronounced fluctuation in total reported debt and leases, with an initial sharp decline from 23,800 thousand USD in 2017 to 10,089 thousand USD in 2018. This is followed by moderate increases and decreases over the subsequent years, culminating in a value of 9,507 thousand USD in 2022, which remains below the initial figure in 2017. This suggests efforts to reduce or manage debt levels with some variability year-over-year.

The stockholders’ equity demonstrates consistent and substantial growth throughout the period. Starting at 452,071 thousand USD in 2017, it more than triples by 2022, reaching 1,503,326 thousand USD. This steady increase signals strengthening equity financing and accumulation of retained earnings or capital contributions, indicating a robust equity base and potentially improved financial stability over time.

Invested capital shows an overall increasing trend from 226,723 thousand USD in 2017 to a peak of 737,876 thousand USD in 2021, before a slight decline to 693,367 thousand USD in 2022. This upward movement may reflect ongoing investments in business operations, assets, or strategic initiatives. The minor decrease in the final year could be indicative of divestments, asset disposals, or revaluation adjustments.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
Initial significant reduction followed by moderate fluctuations, ending below the initial value, suggesting active debt management.
Stockholders’ Equity
Consistent and strong growth, tripling over the period, reflecting enhanced financial strength and shareholder value.
Invested Capital
General upward trend with a peak in 2021 and slight decline in 2022, indicating increased capital investment with some recent contraction.

Cost of Capital

Abiomed Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 31.50%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 31.50%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Abiomed Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Abbott Laboratories
Elevance Health Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Medtronic PLC
UnitedHealth Group Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of economic value added from 2017 to 2022 reveals a trajectory of initial growth followed by a significant decline in value creation. The period is characterized by a substantial expansion of the capital base which, after 2019, failed to yield proportional increases in economic profit, leading to a deterioration of the economic spread ratio.

Economic Spread Ratio Trends
A sharp increase in the economic spread ratio is observed between 2017 and 2018, rising from 13.48% to a peak of 36.59%. Following this peak, the ratio entered a period of consistent decline, falling to 29.17% in 2019, 18.49% in 2020, and 13.41% in 2021. By March 31, 2022, the ratio turned negative at -1.50%, indicating that the return on invested capital fell below the company's cost of capital.
Economic Profit Analysis
Economic profit exhibited strong growth in the early years, increasing from US$ 30,571 thousand in 2017 to a maximum of US$ 145,117 thousand in 2019. A downward trend followed this peak, with profit decreasing to US$ 110,018 thousand in 2020 and US$ 98,967 thousand in 2021. The trend culminated in a negative economic profit of US$ -10,433 thousand in 2022, marking a transition from value creation to value destruction.
Invested Capital Growth
Invested capital grew aggressively from 2017 through 2021, rising from US$ 226,723 thousand to a peak of US$ 737,876 thousand. This represents a substantial increase in the resources deployed. In 2022, a slight contraction in invested capital occurred, with the figure decreasing to US$ 693,367 thousand, though it remained significantly higher than the levels seen at the beginning of the five-year period.

The convergence of rising invested capital and falling economic profit suggests an inefficiency in capital deployment toward the end of the period. The shift to a negative economic spread ratio in 2022 confirms that the incremental capital invested did not generate sufficient returns to cover the implicit cost of that capital.


Economic Profit Margin

Abiomed Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Abbott Laboratories
Elevance Health Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Medtronic PLC
UnitedHealth Group Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial trajectory from March 31, 2017, to March 31, 2022, reveals a significant divergence between revenue growth and economic value creation. While top-line expansion remained consistent throughout the period, the ability to generate economic profit peaked in 2019 before entering a period of contraction that culminated in a negative return in 2022.

Economic Profit Trajectory
Economic profit experienced rapid growth in the early part of the period, rising from 30,571 thousand dollars in 2017 to a peak of 145,117 thousand dollars in 2019. Following this peak, a steady decline was observed over the next two years, with values falling to 110,018 thousand dollars in 2020 and 98,967 thousand dollars in 2021. This downward trend accelerated sharply by March 31, 2022, when economic profit transitioned to a deficit of 10,433 thousand dollars.
Revenue Growth and Scale
Adjusted revenue demonstrated uninterrupted growth over the six-year span. Starting at 447,021 thousand dollars in 2017, revenue increased annually, surpassing the one-billion-dollar threshold by March 31, 2022, reaching 1,033,793 thousand dollars. The continuous rise in revenue highlights a successful expansion of market reach or product demand, despite the simultaneous erosion of economic profit.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin reflects a bell-shaped trend. It improved significantly from 6.84% in 2017 to a maximum of 18.83% in 2019, indicating a period of high capital efficiency. However, the margin contracted to 13.04% in 2020 and further to 11.61% in 2021. By March 31, 2022, the margin fell to -1.01%, signifying that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.
Correlation Between Revenue and Value Creation
An inverse relationship emerged between revenue growth and economic profitability after 2019. While revenue continued to scale, the decline in both absolute economic profit and the profit margin suggests that the costs associated with generating that additional revenue, or the cost of the capital required to support the growth, increased at a rate that outpaced the operational gains.