Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

O’Reilly Automotive Inc. (NASDAQ:ORLY)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 8, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 — = 18.47% × —
Dec 31, 2020 1,249.34% = 15.11% × 82.68
Dec 31, 2019 350.09% = 12.98% × 26.97
Dec 31, 2018 374.50% = 16.60% × 22.57
Dec 31, 2017 173.62% = 14.97% × 11.59

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The two-component DuPont analysis reveals an aggressive expansion of Return on Equity (ROE) between 2017 and 2020, driven primarily by a substantial increase in financial leverage rather than operational growth alone.

Return on Assets (ROA)
ROA demonstrates a generally positive trend, moving from 14.97% in 2017 to 18.47% in 2021. Despite a moderate decline to 12.98% in 2019, the overall movement indicates a consistent and improving capacity to generate earnings from the company's asset base.
Financial Leverage
A sharp and accelerating increase in financial leverage is observed, rising from 11.59 in 2017 to 82.68 by 2020. This trajectory indicates a significant shift in the capital structure, suggesting a substantial reduction in equity relative to total assets, which heavily amplifies the return to shareholders.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE exhibits an exponential increase, climbing from 173.62% in 2017 to 1,249.34% in 2020. Because the growth in ROA remained relatively stable, the dramatic surge in ROE is directly attributable to the compounding effect of the rising financial leverage ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 — = 16.24% × 1.14 × —
Dec 31, 2020 1,249.34% = 15.10% × 1.00 × 82.68
Dec 31, 2019 350.09% = 13.70% × 0.95 × 26.97
Dec 31, 2018 374.50% = 13.89% × 1.19 × 22.57
Dec 31, 2017 173.62% = 12.63% × 1.19 × 11.59

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the three-component DuPont disaggregation reveals a period of extreme growth in Return on Equity (ROE), driven primarily by an aggressive expansion in financial leverage rather than operational efficiency alone. While profitability showed steady improvement, the exponential increase in the equity multiplier serves as the dominant catalyst for the overall return profile.

Net Profit Margin
A consistent upward trend is observed in profitability, with the margin increasing from 12.63% in 2017 to 16.24% by 2021. This steady growth indicates a sustained improvement in cost management and pricing power over the five-year period.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization exhibited volatility, remaining stable at 1.19 through 2018 before declining to a low of 0.95 in 2019. A subsequent recovery trend followed, with the ratio returning to 1.14 by 2021, suggesting a restoration of efficiency in generating sales from the asset base.
Financial Leverage
The most significant variance is found in financial leverage, which surged from 11.59 in 2017 to 82.68 in 2020. This rapid escalation indicates a strategic shift toward a highly leveraged capital structure, likely resulting from significant reductions in shareholders' equity relative to total assets.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE experienced an extraordinary increase, rising from 173.62% in 2017 to a peak of 1,249.34% in 2020. The correlation between the leverage spike and the ROE surge confirms that the growth in returns is predominantly a function of financial engineering and capital structure optimization rather than purely organic operational growth.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 — = 0.78 × 0.95 × 21.96% × 1.14 × —
Dec 31, 2020 1,249.34% = 0.77 × 0.93 × 20.92% × 1.00 × 82.68
Dec 31, 2019 350.09% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 19.02% × 0.95 × 26.97
Dec 31, 2018 374.50% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 19.05% × 1.19 × 22.57
Dec 31, 2017 173.62% = 0.69 × 0.95 × 19.26% × 1.19 × 11.59

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited an extraordinary upward trajectory between 2017 and 2020, escalating from 173.62% to 1,249.34%. This expansion was predominantly fueled by an aggressive increase in financial leverage, although operational profitability also contributed positively toward the end of the period.

Profitability and Burden Metrics
The EBIT margin remained relatively stable from 2017 to 2019, hovering around 19%, before climbing to 21.96% by 2021, indicating a trend of improving operational efficiency. The tax burden showed a notable increase from 0.69 in 2017 to a consistent 0.78 from 2018 through 2021, reflecting a more favorable tax position relative to earnings. The interest burden remained nearly constant, fluctuating minimally between 0.93 and 0.95, which indicates that interest expenses were well-managed relative to operating income.
Asset Utilization
Asset turnover experienced a period of volatility, declining from 1.19 in 2017 and 2018 to a low of 0.95 in 2019. However, a recovery trend followed, with the ratio returning to 1.14 by 2021, suggesting a normalization of asset productivity and efficiency in generating revenue.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage served as the primary catalyst for the surge in ROE. The ratio rose exponentially from 11.59 in 2017 to 82.68 in 2020. This dramatic increase suggests a significant reduction in the equity base relative to total assets, which heavily amplified the returns attributed to shareholders.

The analysis indicates that while the company maintained strong and improving operational margins and stable asset turnover, the extreme growth in ROE was fundamentally driven by changes in the capital structure. The synergy between rising EBIT margins and a massive escalation in financial leverage resulted in the observed exponential increase in equity returns.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 18.47% = 16.24% × 1.14
Dec 31, 2020 15.11% = 15.10% × 1.00
Dec 31, 2019 12.98% = 13.70% × 0.95
Dec 31, 2018 16.60% = 13.89% × 1.19
Dec 31, 2017 14.97% = 12.63% × 1.19

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) for the period between 2017 and 2021 exhibited a fluctuating yet overall positive trajectory, culminating in a peak of 18.47% by the end of 2021. This performance is the result of the interaction between expanding profit margins and varying levels of asset utilization efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
A consistent upward trend in profitability is observed, with the margin increasing from 12.63% in 2017 to 16.24% in 2021. This steady growth suggests an improvement in operational efficiency or pricing power, as the company successfully converted a larger percentage of revenue into net income over the five-year span.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization experienced volatility during the analyzed period. After remaining stable at 1.19 in 2017 and 2018, the ratio declined to 0.95 in 2019, indicating a temporary decrease in the efficiency of generating sales from the asset base. However, a recovery trend followed, with the ratio climbing to 1.14 by 2021, nearly returning to previous historical levels.
ROA Decomposition and Integration
The fluctuations in ROA were primarily driven by the Asset Turnover ratio in the intermediate years. Specifically, the decline in ROA to 12.98% in 2019 was a direct consequence of the drop in asset turnover, which offset the relatively stable profit margins of that year. Conversely, the significant surge in ROA to 18.47% in 2021 was achieved through the compounding effect of both a record-high net profit margin and a recovered asset turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 18.47% = 0.78 × 0.95 × 21.96% × 1.14
Dec 31, 2020 15.11% = 0.77 × 0.93 × 20.92% × 1.00
Dec 31, 2019 12.98% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 19.02% × 0.95
Dec 31, 2018 16.60% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 19.05% × 1.19
Dec 31, 2017 14.97% = 0.69 × 0.95 × 19.26% × 1.19

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a fluctuating but overall upward trajectory between 2017 and 2021, culminating in a peak of 18.47%. While the metric experienced a notable contraction in 2019, falling to 12.98%, subsequent years showed a strong recovery, indicating an improvement in the company's ability to generate earnings from its asset base.

Operating Efficiency and Profitability
The EBIT margin remained relatively stable through 2019, hovering around 19%. However, a significant expansion in profitability occurred starting in 2020, with the margin rising to 20.92% and further increasing to 21.96% by 2021. This suggests a successful increase in operating leverage or improved pricing power during the latter part of the period.
Asset Utilization
Asset turnover experienced a sharp decline in 2019, dropping to 0.95 from a consistent 1.19 in the prior two years. This contraction was the primary driver behind the dip in ROA for that year. A steady recovery followed, with the ratio climbing back to 1.14 by 2021, indicating a return toward historical levels of efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue.
Tax and Interest Burdens
The tax burden showed a marked improvement from 0.69 in 2017 to a stable 0.78 from 2018 through 2021, suggesting a more favorable tax position or a lower effective tax rate over time. The interest burden remained exceptionally stable, fluctuating minimally between 0.93 and 0.95, which indicates a consistent relationship between operating income and interest expenses.
Synthesis of ROA Drivers
The overall increase in ROA by 2021 was driven by a synergistic effect: the recovery of asset turnover combined with a significant expansion in EBIT margins. While tax and interest burdens provided a stable foundation, the primary catalysts for the growth in asset productivity were operational efficiency and improved asset velocity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2021 16.24% = 0.78 × 0.95 × 21.96%
Dec 31, 2020 15.10% = 0.77 × 0.93 × 20.92%
Dec 31, 2019 13.70% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 19.02%
Dec 31, 2018 13.89% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 19.05%
Dec 31, 2017 12.63% = 0.69 × 0.95 × 19.26%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The net profit margin exhibited a consistent upward trajectory over the analyzed five-year period, increasing from 12.63% in 2017 to 16.24% by the end of 2021. This expansion is the result of combined improvements in operational efficiency and tax management.

Operational Performance
The EBIT margin remained relatively stagnant between 2017 and 2019, fluctuating within a narrow range around 19%. However, a notable acceleration in operational profitability occurred starting in 2020, with the margin climbing to 20.92% and further reaching 21.96% in 2021, indicating enhanced core efficiency.
Taxation Impact
A significant improvement in the tax burden was observed between 2017 and 2018, where the ratio rose from 0.69 to 0.78. This ratio remained stable through 2021, suggesting that a larger proportion of operating earnings was retained after taxes starting in 2018.
Financing Costs
The interest burden remained highly stable throughout the period, fluctuating minimally between 0.93 and 0.95. This consistency indicates that interest expenses have been maintained at a steady level relative to operating income, preventing financing costs from impacting the overall margin trend.

The growth in net profit margin was initially catalyzed by a favorable shift in the tax burden in 2018, which provided an immediate lift to the bottom line. In the latter part of the period, the primary driver shifted toward operational strength, as evidenced by the expansion of the EBIT margin from 2020 onward. The stability of the interest burden ensured that these operational and fiscal gains were fully realized in the net profit margin.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?