Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
Analysis of the financial performance from 2013 to 2018 reveals a period of significant volatility in operational earnings and net profitability, characterized by a distinct peak in 2015 and a subsequent sharp contraction in 2016.
- EBITDA Trend Analysis
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization exhibited substantial fluctuation throughout the period. Following a decrease from US$ 10,685 million in 2013 to US$ 7,537 million in 2014, the metric reached a peak of US$ 11,861 million in 2015. A significant downturn occurred in 2016, where EBITDA fell to US$ 5,943 million, representing a decline of approximately 50% from the previous year's peak. The figures subsequently stabilized, remaining within the range of US$ 6,311 million to US$ 6,526 million through 2018.
- Correlation Between Operational and Net Earnings
- A consistent positive correlation is observed between EBITDA, EBIT, and Net Income. The peak in EBITDA in 2015 aligns with the highest reported Net Income of US$ 8,306 million and EBIT of US$ 11,045 million. Similarly, the 2016 contraction was reflected across all metrics, with Net Income dropping to US$ 2,755 million. This synchronization indicates that the volatility in net results was primarily driven by operational performance rather than changes in interest or tax structures.
- Analysis of Non-Cash Charges
- The differential between EBITDA and EBIT reflects the impact of depreciation and amortization. This variance was most significant in 2014 at US$ 1,227 million and reached its lowest point in 2016 at US$ 605 million. Between 2016 and 2018, the gap between EBITDA and EBIT remained relatively narrow and consistent, suggesting a stabilization of non-cash charges during the final three years of the analysis.
- Profitability Recovery Patterns
- Following the 2016 lows, a gradual upward trend in net income attributable to stockholders is observed, rising from US$ 2,755 million in 2016 to US$ 4,464 million in 2018. This recovery in the bottom line occurred while EBITDA remained relatively flat, suggesting that the improvement in net income may have been influenced by factors other than top-line operational growth, such as optimized tax strategies or reduced interest burdens.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 104,923) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 6,311) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.63 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Alphabet Inc. | 22.64 |
| Comcast Corp. | 3.60 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | 17.27 |
| Netflix Inc. | 9.75 |
| Walt Disney Co. | 11.62 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 97,094) | 67,184) | 65,245) | 72,403) | 95,442) | 85,538) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 6,311) | 6,526) | 5,943) | 11,861) | 7,537) | 10,685) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 15.38 | 10.29 | 10.98 | 6.10 | 12.66 | 8.01 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Comcast Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Netflix Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Walt Disney Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
3 2018 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 97,094 ÷ 6,311 = 15.38
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The enterprise value to EBITDA ratio exhibited significant volatility between 2013 and 2018, reflecting a fluctuating relationship between the market valuation of the entity and its operational profitability. The ratio experienced sharp oscillations, reaching a minimum of 6.10 in 2015 and peaking at 15.38 in 2018.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise value demonstrated a non-linear trajectory, starting at 85,538 million USD in 2013 and rising to 95,442 million USD in 2014. A subsequent contraction occurred over the next two years, with values dropping to 65,245 million USD by 2016. However, a strong recovery was observed toward the end of the period, culminating in a peak of 97,094 million USD in 2018.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings were characterized by instability. After a decline in 2014, EBITDA peaked in 2015 at 11,861 million USD. This was followed by a substantial contraction in 2016 to 5,943 million USD, after which the figures remained relatively stagnant, ending the period at 6,311 million USD in 2018.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Interpretation
- The valuation multiple shifted aggressively in response to the divergence between EV and EBITDA. The ratio expanded to 12.66 in 2014 due to rising enterprise value and falling earnings. Conversely, 2015 represented a valuation trough of 6.10, driven by the convergence of a decreasing enterprise value and peak EBITDA. The period concluded with a sharp expansion of the multiple to 15.38 in 2018, resulting from a surge in enterprise value coupled with flat operational earnings, indicating a significant increase in the valuation premium.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?