- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Current Ratio
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Paying user area
Try for free
Yahoo! Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Yahoo! Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
- Current provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The current income tax provision shows significant variability over the analyzed periods. Beginning at a high level of 2,709,363 thousand USD in 2012, the value sharply declined to 237,694 thousand USD in 2013. It then increased substantially to 3,572,229 thousand USD in 2014. The provision reversed to a benefit of 47,257 thousand USD in 2015, indicating a tax credit or reduction in tax expenses. In 2016, it returned to a provision of 98,509 thousand USD, though this was markedly lower than the earlier highs.
- Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The deferred tax provision exhibited a fluctuating pattern, predominantly representing tax benefits except in 2014. It began with a benefit of 769,320 thousand USD in 2012, followed by a smaller benefit of 84,302 thousand USD in 2013. In 2014, this reversed to a provision of 465,873 thousand USD, indicating a deferred tax expense. Subsequently, the deferred tax reverted to benefits of 42,341 thousand USD in 2015 and 224,737 thousand USD in 2016, suggesting favorable adjustments or timing differences reducing tax liabilities in these years.
- Provision (benefit) for income taxes (total)
- The total income tax provision, combining current and deferred components, also demonstrates pronounced volatility throughout the period. It started at 1,940,043 thousand USD in 2012, decreased to 153,392 thousand USD in 2013, and then increased sharply to 4,038,102 thousand USD in 2014, the peak within the timeframe. Following this peak, the total provision became a benefit, amounting to 89,598 thousand USD in 2015 and further increasing to a benefit of 126,228 thousand USD in 2016. This transition indicates a significant shift from tax expense to tax benefit in the later years, possibly reflecting changes in tax positions, accounting estimates, or underlying income and deductible timing differences.
- Overall Observations
- The data reveals a volatile tax expense profile, with substantial swings between provisions and benefits year-over-year. The year 2014 stands out with the highest current and total income tax provisions, suggesting an exceptionally high tax burden or taxable income that year. The subsequent years, 2015 and 2016, show a reversal to tax benefits, indicating either improved tax planning, realizable deferred tax assets, or operating losses that reduced payable taxes. The deferred tax components complement these trends by alternating between benefits and provisions, reflecting timing differences in recognizing income and expenses for tax purposes. The fluctuations may point to variable profitability, changes in tax legislation, or accounting treatments affecting the reported tax expenses.
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
- Net Operating Loss and Tax Credit Carryforwards
- These carryforwards exhibited a fluctuating trend, decreasing from 219,054 thousand USD in 2012 to 148,060 thousand USD in 2013. Afterwards, values slightly recovered and peaked at 185,425 thousand USD in 2015 before falling again to 136,929 thousand USD by 2016.
- Stock-Based Compensation Expense
- The expense showed a consistent decline from 81,910 thousand USD in 2012 to 34,644 thousand USD in 2015, with a small increase to 39,211 thousand USD in 2016, indicating a reduction in stock-based remuneration costs over time.
- Non-Deductible Accrued Expenses
- This item was not reported in 2012 but increased steadily from 52,902 thousand USD in 2013 to 172,224 thousand USD by 2016, reflecting growing accrued expenses that cannot be deducted for tax purposes.
- Deferred Revenue
- Deferred revenue was absent in 2012, followed by a high value of 164,264 thousand USD in 2013, then a sharp decline to 9,023 thousand USD in 2014, and subsequently remained low and stable around 10,000 to 12,300 thousand USD through 2016.
- Fixed Assets (Reported Separately)
- Initially reported as positive figures, fixed assets decreased from 22,937 thousand USD in 2013 to 12,181 thousand USD in 2016, indicating disposals or depreciation. The negative fixed assets line from 2013 onward suggests accumulated depreciation or impairment adjustments growing over time, worsening from -86,641 thousand USD in 2013 to -89,344 thousand USD in 2016.
- Federal Benefits Relating to Tax Positions
- These benefits showed a generally increasing trend, rising from 161,782 thousand USD in 2012 to 336,963 thousand USD in 2016, suggesting higher tax benefits associated with federal tax positions over the years.
- Other Items
- Recurring miscellaneous items fluctuated mildly between 7,281 and 10,642 thousand USD over the period, indicating relatively stable low-level other financial elements.
- Gross Deferred Income Tax Assets
- This asset category grew steadily from 472,191 thousand USD in 2012 to a peak of 767,164 thousand USD in 2014, then declined to 717,134 thousand USD by 2016, indicating a rise followed by some reduction in deferred tax assets.
- Valuation Allowance
- Valuation allowances decreased (became less negative) from -51,503 thousand USD in 2012 to -23,853 thousand USD in 2014, then increased (became more negative) again to -36,354 thousand USD by 2016, suggesting fluctuations in estimated realizability of deferred tax assets.
- Deferred Income Tax Assets (Net of Valuation Allowance)
- These assets followed a rising trend from 420,688 thousand USD in 2012 to 743,311 thousand USD in 2014 but dropped sharply to 646,763 thousand USD in 2015 before recovering slightly to 680,780 thousand USD in 2016, consistent with fluctuations in valuation allowances and gross assets.
- Purchased Intangible Assets
- These assets were negative and reached a nadir in 2014 at -200,569 thousand USD, before substantially improving to -25,833 thousand USD by 2016, indicating disposals, amortization, or impairments reducing intangible asset values.
- Alibaba Unrealized Gains
- Recorded only from 2014 onward, these gains were large negative values ranging from -16,154,906 thousand USD in 2014 to about -13,633,988 thousand USD in 2016, implying significant unrealized losses or declines in investment valuation.
- Unrealized Income in Investments
- Values remained negative throughout the period, particularly bad in 2013 (-323,368 thousand USD) but improving towards 2016 at -8,837 thousand USD, indicating fluctuations in investment performance with a positive recovery trend.
- Restructuring Liabilities
- Liabilities increased from -7,235 thousand USD in 2013 to a peak of -8,224 thousand USD in 2014 and then dropped significantly to -95 thousand USD by 2016, showing a reduction in restructuring obligations.
- Other Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
- These liabilities, absent in early years, appeared as negative amounts beginning in 2014, gradually decreasing from -3,271 thousand USD to -1,278 thousand USD by 2016, suggesting a decline in these liabilities.
- Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
- These liabilities expanded drastically from -43,080 thousand USD in 2012 to large negative figures exceeding -13 million thousand USD from 2014 onward, dominated by valuation effects such as those from Alibaba unrealized gains and other adjustments, reflecting significant taxable temporary differences or investment-related liabilities.
- Net Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities)
- The net position shifted notably from a positive 377,608 thousand USD in 2012 to a near zero 69,227 thousand USD in 2013, then plunged deeply into liabilities exceeding -12 billion thousand USD from 2014 to 2016. This dramatic swing primarily reflects the impact of large deferred tax liabilities linked to investments and other significant temporary differences.
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current deferred tax assets | ||||||
Noncurrent deferred tax assets | ||||||
Current deferred tax liabilities | ||||||
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The financial data reveals notable fluctuations in deferred tax assets and liabilities over the five-year period ending in 2016.
- Current Deferred Tax Assets
- These assets decreased from 249,936 thousand US dollars in 2012 to 218,486 thousand in 2013, followed by an increase to 253,297 thousand in 2014, indicating some volatility. Data for 2015 and 2016 is not available, preventing trend analysis for these years.
- Noncurrent Deferred Tax Assets
- There is a clear declining trend in noncurrent deferred tax assets. Starting at 139,183 thousand in 2012, the value dropped sharply to 23,222 thousand in 2013. After minor increases in 2014 and 2015 (26,179 and 21,745 thousand respectively), it further declined to 18,228 thousand in 2016. This steady decrease suggests a reduction in long-term deferred tax benefits.
- Current Deferred Tax Liabilities
- The current deferred tax liabilities display erratic changes, starting at a modest 200 thousand in 2012, moving to a negative figure (-10 thousand) in 2013, and then sharply rising to 8,119 thousand in 2014. Data for 2015 and 2016 is missing, which limits further analysis of short-term tax obligations.
- Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liabilities
- There is a significant spike in noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, with values soaring from 11,310 thousand in 2012 to 172,491 thousand in 2013. This upward momentum peaks dramatically in 2014 at approximately 16,144,580 thousand, then declines to 12,312,011 thousand in 2015 and slightly rises to 13,096,823 thousand in 2016. The extraordinary increase in 2014 and sustained high levels thereafter indicate substantial long-term tax obligations accumulated or recognized during this period.
Overall, the data demonstrates increasing long-term deferred tax liabilities coincident with decreasing long-term deferred tax assets, which may indicate a shift in tax position or recognition of larger tax obligations over time. The current deferred tax accounts exhibit more volatility and limited data, restricting conclusive trend assessments.
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The financial data reveals several notable trends and shifts in the reported and deferred income tax adjusted figures over the five-year period.
- Current Assets
- There is a fluctuation in reported current assets, which decreased from about 5.65 billion in 2012 to 5.03 billion in 2013, then sharply increased to nearly 9.70 billion in 2014. Afterward, the assets contracted to approximately 7.51 billion in 2015 but showed a slight recovery to around 8.13 billion in 2016. The adjusted current assets follow a similar trajectory, with minor differences, indicating that deferred tax adjustments moderately reduce asset values in earlier years.
- Total Assets
- Total assets exhibit substantial volatility, with reported values moving from roughly 17.10 billion in 2012 down to 16.80 billion in 2013, followed by a dramatic surge to over 61.96 billion in 2014. Subsequently, assets decreased to approximately 45.20 billion in 2015 and modestly rose again to about 48.08 billion in 2016. Adjusted total assets mirror this pattern but maintain consistently lower values due to deferred tax considerations, showing the impact of tax adjustments is more pronounced on long-term assets.
- Current Liabilities
- The level of current liabilities remained relatively stable across the period, fluctuating slightly around the 1.29 to 1.35 billion range in 2012 and 2013, before jumping to about 4.53 billion in 2014. Following this peak, there is a notable reduction back down to approximately 1.28 billion in both 2015 and 2016. Adjusted current liabilities also reflect this trend with negligible differences, suggesting minimal effect of tax adjustments on short-term liabilities.
- Total Liabilities
- Reported total liabilities increased considerably in 2014, rising sharply from roughly 3.67 billion in 2013 to over 23.17 billion, before declining to approximately 16.12 billion in 2015 and then slightly increasing to nearly 17.00 billion in 2016. Adjusted total liabilities present a more moderate increase in 2014 to approximately 7.02 billion, followed by a significant decrease to roughly 3.81 billion in 2015 and a slight rise to about 3.90 billion in 2016. This divergence highlights substantial deferred tax adjustments affecting total liabilities, particularly in 2014 and subsequent years.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Reported stockholders’ equity decreases from about 14.56 billion in 2012 to roughly 13.07 billion in 2013, then escalates significantly to over 38.74 billion in 2014, after which it declines to around 29.04 billion in 2015 before slightly increasing to 31.05 billion in 2016. Adjusted equity values, however, are lower in earlier years and notably higher in 2014 at approximately 54.62 billion, subsequently dropping to around 41.33 billion in 2015 and 44.13 billion in 2016. These differences again underline the considerable impact of deferred tax adjustments, especially in 2014.
- Net Income (Loss)
- Reported net income shows a declining trend, starting at approximately 3.95 billion in 2012, falling sharply to about 1.37 billion in 2013, then rising to 7.52 billion in 2014, subsequently plunging into losses of approximately 4.36 billion in 2015 and a smaller loss of 0.21 billion in 2016. The adjusted net income follows a similar pattern but reflects lower income and higher losses, suggesting deferred tax adjustments reduce reported profitability, particularly notable in years with large positive income and significant losses.
Overall, the data suggests volatility primarily driven by significant events in 2014, which greatly increased asset and equity balances and liabilities under reported figures. Deferred tax adjustments consistently reduce asset values and equity while decreasing liabilities, reflecting the accounting treatment of tax timing differences. The company's profitability shows a sharp decline into losses after 2014, with adjusted results indicating a more conservative earnings position once tax effects are considered.
Yahoo! Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The analysis of the financial data reveals several notable trends and fluctuations over the five-year period.
- Current Ratio
- Both reported and adjusted current ratios demonstrate a decline from 2012 to 2014, dropping from above 4.0 to approximately 2.1, indicating a decrease in short-term liquidity. However, there is a strong recovery in 2015 and 2016, with ratios increasing sharply to over 5.8 and reaching above 6.3 in 2016, suggesting improved ability to cover short-term liabilities.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin shows considerable volatility. Initially, it decreased significantly from high levels in 2012 (around 79% reported and 64% adjusted) to around 27% in 2013. In 2014, the margin spikes dramatically to over 160% (reported) and 170% (adjusted), possibly reflecting unusual income or expenses. This is followed by a steep decline into negative territory in 2015 and 2016, with margins reported as -87.74% and -4.15%, and adjusted as -88.59% and -8.49%, indicating losses during these years.
- Total Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratios remain relatively stable but low across the period, indicating limited efficiency in using assets to generate sales. The values hover around 0.3 in earlier years, dropping to 0.07 in 2014 and slightly recovering to 0.11 subsequently, showing no significant improvement in asset utilization.
- Financial Leverage
- Reported financial leverage increases from 1.17 in 2012 to a peak of 1.6 in 2014 before slightly declining to around 1.55 by 2016. In contrast, adjusted financial leverage shows a rise to 1.29 in 2013 but then declines to approximately 1.09 by 2015 and 2016, suggesting that adjustments reduce perceived leverage and the related financial risk.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- Reported ROE reflects a decline from a strong 27.1% in 2012 to negative returns in 2015 and 2016 (-15.01% and -0.69%). Adjusted ROE follows a similar pattern but at slightly lower levels, demonstrating deterioration in shareholder profitability, particularly in the latter years.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Both reported and adjusted ROA showcase a decreasing trend with positive returns initially (around 23% reported and 19% adjusted in 2012) but turning negative in 2015 and 2016. This indicates challenges in asset profitability, consistent with the negative ROE and net profit margins during the same period.
Overall, the financial data reveals a period of declining profitability and efficiency after 2014, with significant losses emerging in 2015 and 2016. Positive liquidity ratios in 2015 and 2016 suggest maintained or improved short-term financial stability despite operational difficulties. Adjustments in financial leverage and profitability metrics provide somewhat less severe but consistent indications of the trends observed in the reported data.
Yahoo! Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =
2 Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Adjusted current liabilities
= ÷ =
The financial data presents the trends in reported and deferred income tax adjusted figures for current assets, current liabilities, and current ratios over five consecutive years ending December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2016.
- Current Assets
- Reported current assets show a fluctuating trend, beginning at approximately 5.65 billion US dollars in 2012, declining to about 5.03 billion in 2013, then rising sharply to nearly 9.70 billion in 2014, followed by a decrease to 7.51 billion in 2015, and a moderate increase to 8.13 billion in 2016.
- Adjusted current assets follow a similar pattern but are consistently lower than reported values, reflecting adjustments primarily in the earlier years. The adjustment difference narrows to zero in 2015 and 2016, indicating alignment between reported and adjusted figures in the latter years.
- Current Liabilities
- Reported current liabilities remain relatively stable around 1.29 billion US dollars in 2012 and 2013, then sharply increase to approximately 4.53 billion in 2014 before reverting to a lower level around 1.28 billion in 2015 and 2016.
- Adjusted current liabilities mirror the reported values with minimal differences, mostly in 2014 where the adjusted liabilities are marginally lower, suggesting slight corrections or deferred tax impact adjustments during that period.
- Current Ratio
- Reported current ratios decline from 4.38 in 2012 to 2.14 in 2014, reflecting the combination of rising liabilities and increased assets, then increase sharply to 5.88 in 2015 and further to 6.31 in 2016, highlighting improved short-term liquidity and a stronger ability to cover current obligations.
- Adjusted current ratios trend closely alongside the reported ones, generally slightly lower except in the last two years where the ratios converge, indicating that deferred tax adjustments had a diminishing effect on liquidity ratios over time.
Overall, the data reveals a volatility in both assets and liabilities around 2014 with a spike in liabilities and assets leading to a decreased current ratio, followed by a recovery and strengthening of liquidity in the subsequent years. The convergence between reported and adjusted figures over time suggests a reduction in deferred income tax effects or improved recognition alignment in the financial statements by 2015 and 2016.
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. ÷ Revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. ÷ Revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
The financial data exhibits significant fluctuations in both reported and adjusted net income attributable to the company over the five-year period analyzed. Initially, in 2012, net income was strong and positive, exceeding three million US dollars, with adjusted net income closely following this trend. By 2014, both reported and adjusted net incomes peaked substantially, reaching their highest levels within the period, indicating a period of increased profitability.
However, from 2015 onward, a sharp reversal in profitability is observed. Both reported and adjusted net incomes turned negative, reflecting losses. The losses in 2015 are notably large, with reported figures showing a negative amount exceeding four million US dollars, and adjusted figures similarly indicating substantial losses. In 2016, the losses narrowed significantly but remained negative, suggesting some recovery or cost management efforts had an impact, though the company remained unprofitable.
Regarding profitability margins, a similar pattern emerges. The reported net profit margin began at a strong positive rate in 2012, showing nearly 80%, and fluctuated before reaching an extremely high peak above 160% in 2014. The adjusted net profit margin mirrors this behavior, also peaking at an even higher level close to 173% in 2014. This peak indicates exceptional profit relative to revenue or other relevant base measures in that year.
From 2015, both margins swung sharply into negative territory, with reported net profit margin plummeting to nearly -88% and adjusted net profit margin following with a close figure. This drastic decline underscores the significant losses encountered. In 2016, while margins improved from the extreme lows of the prior year, they remained negative, with reported margin at around -4% and adjusted margin at approximately -8.5%. The margin improvement suggests a lessening of losses and some operational or financial stabilization efforts.
Overall, the trend indicates a period of volatile profitability with a peak in 2014 followed by a substantial downturn in subsequent years. The alignment of reported and adjusted figures in both absolute income and margins suggests consistency in accounting adjustments related to income tax effects, with no major discrepancies between reported and adjusted results. The company's profitability profile deteriorated strongly after 2014, and while there is some evidence of improvement in 2016, the financial data points to ongoing challenges in returning to sustained profitability.
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= ÷ =
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Adjusted total assets
= ÷ =
- Total Assets
- The reported total assets display a fluctuating pattern over the five-year period. The value decreases slightly from approximately 17.1 billion US dollars in 2012 to 16.8 billion in 2013, followed by a significant increase in 2014 reaching about 61.96 billion. This peak is succeeded by a decline in 2015 to roughly 45.2 billion and a moderate increase in 2016 to about 48.1 billion. The adjusted total assets follow a similar trend, with values closely tracking the reported figures but consistently slightly lower, reflecting the impact of deferred income tax adjustments.
- Total Asset Turnover
- Both reported and adjusted total asset turnover rates illustrate a downward trend from 2012 to 2014, dropping from around 0.29-0.30 to 0.07. This sharp decline in asset turnover suggests reduced efficiency in generating sales from assets during that period. Subsequently, there is an improvement in 2015, with turnover rising to approximately 0.11 and maintaining a stable level through 2016. The adjusted total asset turnover is virtually identical to the reported ratio, indicating minimal effect of tax adjustments on this efficiency measure.
- Analysis Summary
- The data indicates a period of substantial asset growth primarily in 2014, coupled with a marked reduction in asset turnover that year, signaling potential challenges in asset utilization efficiency. The partial recovery of asset turnover in the later years coincides with a reduction in total assets from the 2014 peak, implying strategic adjustments to asset management. Adjustments for deferred income tax result in slightly lower asset values but do not materially affect turnover ratios, suggesting that tax timing differences have a limited impact on operational efficiency metrics.
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
The data indicates significant fluctuations in both total assets and stockholders' equity over the five-year period under review, along with notable differences between reported and adjusted figures, especially in financial leverage.
- Total Assets
- Reported total assets exhibit variability, starting at approximately 17.1 billion US dollars at the end of 2012, slightly decreasing to 16.8 billion in 2013, then sharply increasing to over 61.9 billion in 2014 before declining to around 45.2 billion in 2015 and slightly rising to 48.1 billion by 2016.
- Adjusted total assets follow a similar trend but consistently appear marginally lower than reported figures. They begin at approximately 16.7 billion in 2012, decreasing slightly in 2013, peaking near 61.7 billion in 2014, and then settling around 45.2 billion in 2015 and 48.1 billion in 2016.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Reported stockholders' equity reveals a declining trend from 14.6 billion in 2012 to 13.1 billion in 2013, followed by a substantial increase to nearly 38.7 billion in 2014. Subsequently, it decreases to approximately 29 billion in 2015 and recovers slightly to 31 billion in 2016.
- Adjusted stockholders’ equity demonstrates a more pronounced increase between 2013 and 2014, rising from about 13 billion to 54.6 billion. Afterward, a decline to roughly 41.3 billion occurs in 2015, followed by a modest increase to 44.1 billion in 2016. Notably, adjusted equity figures are substantially higher than reported figures from 2014 onward.
- Financial Leverage
- Reported financial leverage generally increases over time, starting at 1.17 in 2012, growing to 1.29 in 2013, reaching a peak of 1.6 in 2014, and then slightly decreasing to approximately 1.55 by 2016.
- In contrast, adjusted financial leverage shows a different pattern. It starts marginally higher than reported at 1.18 in 2012, dips slightly to 1.27 in 2013, then declines significantly to around 1.13 in 2014, continuing to decrease to 1.09 in both 2015 and 2016. This suggests a trend toward lower leverage when adjusted for deferred income tax impacts.
Overall, the adjusted data suggest adjustments related to deferred income taxes significantly affect stockholders’ equity and leverage ratios, particularly from 2014 onward, reflecting a more conservative leverage position compared to reported figures. The large increases and decreases, especially in 2014, may indicate considerable adjustments or events impacting the balance sheet during that year. The downward trend in adjusted financial leverage indicates strengthening equity relative to liabilities after tax adjustments, while reported leverage indicates the opposite, underscoring the importance of considering deferred tax impacts in financial analysis.
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. ÷ Total Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity
= 100 × ÷ =
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. ÷ Adjusted total Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity
= 100 × ÷ =
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in both reported and adjusted net income attributable to the company over the five-year period. Initially, reported net income was strong with a peak in 2014, but then it declined sharply, turning negative in 2015 and remaining negative in 2016. Adjusted net income follows a similar trajectory, showing substantial growth until 2014, followed by considerable losses in the last two years. This pattern indicates increasing operational or external challenges affecting profitability after 2014.
Total stockholders’ equity also demonstrates notable changes. Reported stockholders’ equity grew gradually from 2012 through 2014, with a significant jump in 2014, then declined in 2015 before rising slightly in 2016. Adjusted total equity shows a similar overall trend but with higher values from 2014 onwards, suggesting adjustments related to income tax or other accounting factors substantially increased the equity base in those years. The peak in adjusted equity in 2014 and its subsequent trend indicates possible revaluations or deferred tax adjustments impacting equity.
Return on equity (ROE) trends for both reported and adjusted figures align with the net income patterns. Reported ROE was highest in 2012 and 2014, with a notable dip in 2013, before plunging into negative territory in 2015 and 2016, indicative of losses relative to equity. Adjusted ROE shows a consistent decrease over time, also turning negative in the two most recent years. The divergence between reported and adjusted ROE percentages, particularly in the middle and later years, reflects the impact of the income tax and other adjustments on profitability measures.
- Net Income Trends
- Both reported and adjusted net income experienced peak profitability in 2014, followed by sharp declines and losses in 2015 and 2016, indicating worsening financial performance during those years.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Reported equity grew until 2014, dropped in 2015, and slightly recovered in 2016. Adjusted equity shows higher values from 2014 with growth after 2015, implying significant accounting adjustments affecting the equity base.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE followed a downward trend, with positive returns early on and negative returns in the last two years, highlighting profitability challenges relative to the equity base, with adjusted ROE consistently reflecting a more conservative profitability estimate.
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. ÷ Total assets
= 100 × ÷ =
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × ÷ =
- Net Income Trends
- The reported net income attributable to the company exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period. It starts at a high level in 2012, then declines sharply in 2013. A substantial increase is noted in 2014, followed by a reversal to negative values in 2015 and 2016, reflecting losses. The adjusted net income follows a similar pattern, though the magnitudes are slightly different, maintaining the overall trend of profitability decline culminating in losses in the last two years.
- Asset Base Developments
- The reported total assets increased markedly from 2013 to 2014, more than tripling in value. This surge is followed by a decrease in 2015 and a moderate increase in 2016. The adjusted total assets mirror this behavior closely, suggesting consistency between reported and adjusted valuations. The sharp asset increase in 2014 might indicate significant acquisitions or revaluations during that period.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- The reported ROA shows strong profitability in 2012 at 23.07%, but this profitability decreases steadily through 2013 and 2014. By 2015, ROA turns negative and remains so in 2016, indicating operational challenges or impairments affecting asset profitability. The adjusted ROA reflects a consistent trend relative to the reported figure, albeit with slightly different percentage points, supporting the observed decline in asset efficiency and earnings generation from 2012 onward.
- Overall Insights
- The company experienced a period of strong financial performance in the early years of the range, followed by increased volatility and eventual losses. The asset base expanded significantly at one point, but profitability metrics suggest that this growth did not translate into sustained earnings. The negative returns on assets in the last two years highlight operational difficulties or negative financial impacts that diminished value despite asset holdings.