EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Albemarle Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Albemarle Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initially, the company experienced negative economic profit, which progressively worsened before a substantial turnaround in the most recent year. This analysis details the observed trends in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, invested capital, and ultimately, economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT decreased from US$827.216 million in 2018 to US$504.001 million in 2020, indicating a declining operational profitability. However, a dramatic increase occurred in 2022, with NOPAT reaching US$3,022.027 million. This represents a significant improvement in operational performance.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited some volatility. It decreased from 20.51% in 2018 to 18.08% in 2019, then increased to 22.03% in 2022. The increasing cost of capital in later years likely contributed to the initial negative economic profit trend, despite the eventual NOPAT increase.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased over the period, rising from US$5,433.093 million in 2018 to US$10,052.399 million in 2022. The largest increase occurred between 2021 and 2022. This expansion in invested capital, coupled with the initially declining NOPAT, exacerbated the negative economic profit during the earlier years.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative from 2018 through 2021, with the deficit widening each year, reaching a peak of negative US$1,229.680 million in 2021. This indicates that the company’s returns were not exceeding its cost of capital during these years. However, 2022 saw a substantial shift, with economic profit turning positive at US$807.870 million. This positive economic profit suggests that the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital in that year, driven primarily by the significant increase in NOPAT.
In summary, the company experienced a period of declining economic performance, culminating in substantial losses, before achieving a significant turnaround in the final year. The improvement in economic profit in 2022 appears to be largely attributable to a substantial increase in NOPAT, which offset the increasing cost of capital and invested capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest and financing expenses = Adjusted interest and financing expenses × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation.
- Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation
- The net income showed a declining trend from 2018 to 2021, decreasing from approximately 693.6 million USD in 2018 to 123.7 million USD in 2021. This represents a substantial drop over four years. However, in 2022, there was a significant and notable rebound, with net income reaching approximately 2.69 billion USD, marking an exceptional increase compared to previous years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income over the observed period. From 2018 to 2021, NOPAT steadily decreased from around 827.2 million USD to 230.4 million USD, indicating a reduction in operating profitability after taxes. In 2022, there was a strong recovery, with NOPAT rising to approximately 3.02 billion USD, which surpasses all previous years by a wide margin.
- Overall Trend Analysis
- Both net income and NOPAT experienced a clear downward trend during the period from 2018 to 2021, reflecting challenges that negatively impacted profitability. The drastic improvement in 2022 suggests a significant positive change in the company's operational performance or market conditions, resulting in substantially higher earnings and operating profits. This marked turnaround may warrant further investigation into underlying drivers, such as changes in revenue, cost structure, or market factors.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense shows a decreasing trend from 2018 to 2021, moving from 144,826 thousand US dollars in 2018 down to 29,446 thousand US dollars in 2021. This represents a significant reduction over the four-year period. However, in 2022, the income tax expense sharply increased to 390,588 thousand US dollars, indicating a reversal of the previous downward trend and a substantial rise compared to all prior years in the dataset.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes decreased steadily from 107,671 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 72,906 thousand US dollars in 2020. There was a slight increase in 2021, with cash operating taxes rising to 82,002 thousand US dollars. In 2022, there was a notable surge to 324,092 thousand US dollars, mirroring the sharp increase seen in income tax expense for the same year. Overall, the trend from 2018 through 2021 was downward with a peak drop in 2020, followed by a steep upward movement in 2022.
- Summary of Tax-Related Expenses
- Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes generally declined from 2018 through 2021, reaching their lowest values in 2021. The year 2022, however, saw a pronounced increase in these tax-related costs, with figures markedly higher than previous years. This substantial rise in 2022 may reflect changes in taxable income, tax rates, or other external factors affecting the company's tax obligations in that period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of equity equivalents to total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed period. Starting from approximately 1.84 billion at the end of 2018, the debt level increased substantially to about 3.19 billion by the end of 2019, marking a notable escalation. This upward trend continued into 2020, reaching roughly 3.71 billion, before experiencing a decline to around 2.55 billion in 2021. However, in 2022, the debt surged again, rising to approximately 3.35 billion. Overall, this indicates periods of increased leveraging interspersed with some reduction, pointing to possible strategic financing adjustments or capital restructuring during these years.
- Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity
- Shareholders’ equity showed a consistent upward trajectory throughout the five-year span. Beginning with about 3.59 billion at the end of 2018, equity rose steadily each year, reaching approximately 7.98 billion by the end of 2022. The rate of increase became more pronounced in the later years, particularly from 2021 to 2022, suggesting strong retention of earnings and/or additional equity financing. This growth in equity signifies an improvement in the company's net asset base and financial strength, supporting sustainable long-term operations.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital also demonstrated an overall increasing trend, albeit with some variability. Starting at about 5.43 billion in 2018, it increased to roughly 6.90 billion in 2019 and 7.38 billion in 2020. In 2021, there was a noticeable decline to approximately 6.79 billion, before a significant jump to about 10.05 billion in 2022. The sharp increase in the final year suggests substantial new investments or acquisitions that expanded the company’s capital base. Fluctuations in invested capital correspond closely with changes in debt and equity, reflecting shifts in funding strategy and capital deployment over time.
Cost of Capital
Albemarle Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a consistently negative trend from 2018 through 2021, followed by a significant positive shift in 2022. This indicates a progression from generating returns below the cost of capital to exceeding it within the observed period. The magnitude of the negative spread increased substantially over the first four years before reversing course.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio was -5.28%. This value deteriorated to -8.44% in 2019, representing a widening gap between returns and the cost of capital. The decline continued, reaching -13.16% in 2020 and further worsening to -18.10% in 2021. This four-year period demonstrates a consistent erosion of value creation. However, a substantial improvement occurred in 2022, with the ratio increasing to 8.04%, signifying a transition to positive economic value creation.
The negative economic spread ratios from 2018 to 2021 correlate with negative economic profit values during the same period. The magnitude of the economic profit losses generally increased alongside the declining economic spread ratio. The positive economic spread ratio in 2022 aligns with the positive economic profit reported for that year, suggesting a strong relationship between these two metrics.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased from 2018 to 2022, with a slight decrease observed between 2020 and 2021. The increase from US$5,433,093 thousand in 2018 to US$10,052,399 thousand in 2022 suggests expansion of the capital base. The temporary decrease in 2021 did not prevent the overall upward trend. The substantial increase in invested capital in 2022, coupled with a positive economic spread, indicates that capital was deployed more effectively in that year.
The substantial turnaround in 2022 is noteworthy. The shift from a negative economic spread ratio to a positive one suggests improved operational efficiency, better capital allocation, or a more favorable economic environment. Further investigation would be required to determine the specific drivers of this change.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a significant shift over the five-year period. Initially negative, the metric transitioned to positive territory in the most recent year analyzed. This evolution warrants a closer examination of the underlying factors contributing to these changes.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin demonstrated a consistently negative trend from 2018 through 2021. Beginning at -8.50% in 2018, the margin deteriorated to -16.22% in 2019, then to -31.06% in 2020, and reached its lowest point at -36.95% in 2021. A substantial improvement occurred in 2022, with the margin rising to 11.04%.
The negative economic profit margins from 2018 to 2021 indicate that the company’s returns were insufficient to cover its cost of capital during those years. The increasing negativity suggests a widening gap between returns and the cost of capital. The dramatic positive shift in 2022 signifies that the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital, indicating improved profitability and efficient capital allocation.
- Relationship to Net Sales
- Net sales experienced fluctuations during the period. Sales increased from US$3,374,950 thousand in 2018 to US$3,589,427 thousand in 2019, then decreased to US$3,128,909 thousand in 2020, and moderately increased to US$3,327,957 thousand in 2021. A significant surge in net sales occurred in 2022, reaching US$7,320,104 thousand. This substantial increase in sales likely played a key role in the positive economic profit margin observed in that year, although the impact of cost of capital must also be considered.
The correlation between net sales and the economic profit margin is apparent. While negative economic profit margins were observed during periods of relatively stable or declining sales, the substantial increase in sales in 2022 coincided with a positive economic profit margin. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent to which increased sales volume, improved pricing strategies, or reduced costs contributed to the improved financial performance.
- Economic Profit
- The absolute value of economic profit increased from US$287,001 thousand in 2018 to US$1,229,680 thousand in 2021, mirroring the worsening economic profit margin. However, in 2022, economic profit became positive, reaching US$807,870 thousand. This change indicates a substantial improvement in the company’s ability to generate wealth for its investors.