Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 4, 2016.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Baxter International Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 3.63 2.39 2.19 2.46 2.61
Receivables turnover 5.76 5.95 5.24 5.85 5.74
Payables turnover 8.13 6.74 6.95 8.99 8.61
Working capital turnover 1.65 3.87 3.72 3.15 3.66
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 101 153 167 149 140
Add: Average receivable collection period 63 61 70 62 64
Operating cycle 164 214 237 211 204
Less: Average payables payment period 45 54 53 41 42
Cash conversion cycle 119 160 184 170 162

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Analysis of operating activity ratios from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of fluctuation in asset management efficiency, culminating in a significant improvement in inventory liquidity by the end of the period.

Inventory and Operating Cycle
Inventory turnover experienced a downward trend until 2013, reaching a low of 2.19, which correlated with a peak in the average inventory processing period of 167 days. However, a substantial recovery occurred in 2015, with turnover increasing to 3.63 and the processing period falling to 101 days. This improvement directly contributed to the reduction of the operating cycle from a peak of 237 days in 2013 to 164 days in 2015.
Receivables Management
The receivables turnover and the average receivable collection period remained relatively stable throughout the five-year period. The collection period fluctuated narrowly between 61 and 70 days, indicating a consistent credit and collection policy with minimal volatility.
Payables and Cash Conversion
Payables turnover decreased between 2012 and 2014, resulting in an extension of the average payables payment period from 41 days to a peak of 54 days. The cash conversion cycle followed a trajectory similar to the operating cycle, peaking at 184 days in 2013 before decreasing significantly to 119 days in 2015, primarily driven by the enhanced efficiency in inventory movement.
Working Capital Efficiency
Working capital turnover remained relatively steady between 3.15 and 3.87 from 2011 to 2014. A notable decline is observed in 2015, where the ratio dropped to 1.65, suggesting a marked increase in the level of working capital relative to the volume of sales generated during that period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

Baxter International Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 5,822 8,514 7,664 6,889 6,847
Inventories 1,604 3,559 3,499 2,803 2,628
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 3.63 2.39 2.19 2.46 2.61
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= 5,822 ÷ 1,604 = 3.63

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of inventory activity from 2011 to 2015 reveals two distinct phases of operational performance. An initial period of declining efficiency is followed by a sharp correction in 2015, characterized by a significant reduction in both cost of sales and total inventory levels.

Inventory Turnover Trends (2011-2014)
Between 2011 and 2013, a downward trend in the inventory turnover ratio is observed, falling from 2.61 to 2.19. During this period, inventories grew from 2,628 million US dollars to 3,499 million US dollars, increasing at a rate that outpaced the growth in cost of sales. This indicates a decrease in the efficiency of inventory management, as more capital was tied up in stock relative to the volume of goods sold. A marginal recovery occurred in 2014, with the ratio increasing to 2.39, despite the cost of sales reaching a five-year peak of 8,514 million US dollars.
Operational Shift in 2015
A significant deviation in financial patterns occurs in 2015, where the inventory turnover ratio increases sharply to 3.63, the highest value in the analyzed period. This improvement is driven by a substantial contraction in the scale of operations; inventories decreased by approximately 55% to 1,604 million US dollars, and the cost of sales fell to 5,822 million US dollars. The disproportionate decrease in inventory relative to the decrease in cost of sales resulted in a marked acceleration of the turnover rate, suggesting a structural reorganization, such as a divestiture of a business segment or a comprehensive inventory optimization strategy.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Receivables Turnover

Baxter International Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 9,968 16,671 15,259 14,190 13,893
Accounts and other current receivables, net 1,731 2,803 2,911 2,425 2,420
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 5.76 5.95 5.24 5.85 5.74
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Accounts and other current receivables, net
= 9,968 ÷ 1,731 = 5.76

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of steady revenue expansion followed by a significant contraction in the final year. Despite substantial fluctuations in the absolute values of net sales and current receivables, the efficiency of the company's credit collection process remained remarkably consistent.

Net Sales Trends
A consistent upward trajectory in net sales was observed from 2011 through 2014, with revenue increasing from 13,893 million US$ to a peak of 16,671 million US$. However, 2015 marked a sharp decline, with sales falling to 9,968 million US$, representing a significant reduction in the scale of operations.
Accounts and Other Current Receivables
The balance of net receivables generally correlated with sales volume. Values remained stable between 2011 and 2012, peaked at 2,911 million US$ in 2013, and subsequently decreased to 1,731 million US$ by 2015. This decline in receivables in 2015 aligns with the overall reduction in net sales for that period.
Receivables Turnover Performance
The receivables turnover ratio demonstrated high stability throughout the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 5.24 and 5.95. A slight dip in efficiency occurred in 2013, where the ratio fell to 5.24, but this was followed by a peak of 5.95 in 2014. By 2015, the ratio normalized to 5.76.
Operational Insight
The stability of the turnover ratio suggests that the company maintained a consistent credit policy and collection efficiency regardless of the volatility in sales volume. The ability to maintain a ratio of 5.76 in 2015, despite the substantial drop in net sales, indicates that the reduction in receivables was proportional to the loss of revenue, preventing any degradation in the quality of the accounts receivable portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Payables Turnover

Baxter International Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 5,822 8,514 7,664 6,889 6,847
Accounts payable, principally trade 716 1,264 1,103 766 795
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 8.13 6.74 6.95 8.99 8.61
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable, principally trade
= 5,822 ÷ 716 = 8.13

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the payables turnover ratio reveals a fluctuating trend between 2011 and 2015, characterized by a period of deceleration in payment velocity followed by a significant recovery in the final year.

Payables Turnover Ratio Trends
The turnover ratio began at 8.61 in 2011 and saw a slight increase to 8.99 in 2012, indicating an efficient cycle of settling supplier obligations. However, a downward trend emerged in 2013 and 2014, with the ratio dropping to 6.95 and 6.74, respectively. This decline suggests a lengthening of the payment period to suppliers. By 2015, the ratio rebounded to 8.13, signaling a return toward the efficiency levels observed at the start of the period.
Cost of Sales and Accounts Payable Correlation
Between 2011 and 2014, cost of sales exhibited a steady upward trajectory, rising from 6,847 million to 8,514 million. During the 2013-2014 window, accounts payable grew disproportionately faster than the cost of sales, increasing from 766 million in 2012 to 1,264 million in 2014. This divergence explains the contraction in the turnover ratio, as the company extended its payables balance relative to its procurement volume.
Fiscal Shift in 2015
A sharp contraction occurred in 2015, where cost of sales fell to 5,822 million and accounts payable decreased to 716 million. Despite the reduction in both metrics, the turnover ratio increased to 8.13. This indicates that the reduction in the accounts payable balance was more pronounced than the reduction in costs, resulting in a more rapid turnover of short-term obligations.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Working Capital Turnover

Baxter International Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 11,796 10,351 10,004 9,260 8,650
Less: Current liabilities 5,750 6,042 5,906 4,759 4,857
Working capital 6,046 4,309 4,098 4,501 3,793
 
Net sales 9,968 16,671 15,259 14,190 13,893
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 1.65 3.87 3.72 3.15 3.66
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 9,968 ÷ 6,046 = 1.65

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operational activity between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of relative stability and growth in efficiency followed by a significant contraction in the final year.

Net Sales Trends
Revenue demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory from 2011 through 2014, increasing from US$ 13,893 million to a peak of US$ 16,671 million. This growth phase was abruptly reversed in 2015, where net sales declined sharply to US$ 9,968 million.
Working Capital Fluctuations
Working capital remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2014, oscillating between US$ 3,793 million and US$ 4,501 million. However, a significant increase was observed in 2015, with working capital rising to US$ 6,046 million, the highest level recorded during the analyzed period.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio remained strong and relatively stable from 2011 to 2014, moving from 3.66 to a peak of 3.87. This indicates an efficient utilization of short-term assets to generate sales. In 2015, the ratio experienced a severe decline to 1.65. This downturn is the result of a dual negative impact: a substantial decrease in net sales coupled with a significant increase in working capital, signifying a marked reduction in operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Inventory Processing Period

Baxter International Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 3.63 2.39 2.19 2.46 2.61
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 101 153 167 149 140
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.63 = 101

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the short-term operating activity indicates a fluctuating trend in inventory management efficiency between 2011 and 2015. The period was characterized by an initial decline in turnover efficiency that reached its lowest point in 2013, followed by a significant acceleration in operational velocity by the end of 2015.

Inventory Turnover
The turnover ratio experienced a steady decline from 2.61 in 2011 to a minimum of 2.19 in 2013. A recovery began in 2014 with a ratio of 2.39, culminating in a sharp increase to 3.63 in 2015. This final movement represents the highest level of inventory turnover within the observed period, suggesting a marked improvement in the ability to move goods relative to average stock levels.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The number of days required to process inventory moved in inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. The processing period lengthened from 140 days in 2011 to a peak of 167 days in 2013. This trend reversed in 2014, decreasing to 153 days, and shifted dramatically in 2015, where the period dropped to 101 days. This substantial reduction indicates a significant increase in the speed of inventory circulation and a decrease in the amount of time capital remained tied up in stock.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Receivable Collection Period

Baxter International Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 5.76 5.95 5.24 5.85 5.74
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 63 61 70 62 64
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.76 = 63

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The efficiency of receivables management between 2011 and 2015 exhibits a pattern of relative stability characterized by moderate fluctuations. The operational cycle for converting receivables into cash remains consistently within a narrow range, indicating a disciplined approach to credit and collection policies over the five-year period.

Receivables Turnover Trends
The receivables turnover ratio shows minimal volatility, fluctuating between a low of 5.24 in 2013 and a peak of 5.95 in 2014. While there was a noticeable decline in turnover during 2013, the subsequent recovery in 2014 suggests a temporary disruption rather than a systemic failure in credit management.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period mirrors the turnover trends, varying from 61 to 70 days. A peak in the collection period occurred in 2013, where the duration extended to 70 days, marking the least efficient year in the period analyzed. Efficiency improved significantly in 2014, reaching a five-year low of 61 days, before settling at 63 days in 2015.
Correlation and Operational Insight
A clear inverse correlation is observed between the turnover ratio and the collection period. The data indicates that the organization typically recovers its outstanding receivables in approximately two months. The consistency of these metrics suggests that credit terms and the payment behavior of customers remained largely stable throughout the observed timeframe.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Operating Cycle

Baxter International Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 101 153 167 149 140
Average receivable collection period 63 61 70 62 64
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 164 214 237 211 204
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 101 + 63 = 164

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle demonstrated a fluctuating trend from 2011 to 2015, characterized by a gradual increase in duration reaching a peak in 2013, followed by a significant contraction in 2015. The overall length of the operating cycle was predominantly influenced by the inventory processing period, while the collection of receivables remained relatively stable.

Average Inventory Processing Period
An upward trend was observed between 2011 and 2013, with the period extending from 140 days to a peak of 167 days. This indicates a slowdown in inventory turnover during this window. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2015, where the processing period dropped to 101 days, representing the lowest level in the analyzed timeframe and signaling a marked improvement in inventory management efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period remained consistent throughout the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 61 and 70 days. The stability of this metric suggests that credit policies and collection efforts remained constant and were not a primary driver of the volatility observed in the total operating cycle.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle mirrored the trajectory of inventory processing, increasing from 204 days in 2011 to 237 days in 2013. A significant reduction is noted by 2015, where the cycle shortened to 164 days. This reduction of 73 days from the 2013 peak highlights a substantial enhancement in the velocity at which the company converts its operating assets back into cash.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Payables Payment Period

Baxter International Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 8.13 6.74 6.95 8.99 8.61
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 45 54 53 41 42
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.13 = 45

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2011 and 2015 reveals significant fluctuations in the management of accounts payable, characterized by a notable expansion of the payment cycle during the mid-period followed by a correction in the final year.

Payables Turnover
A non-linear trend is observed in the turnover ratio. After a slight increase from 8.61 in 2011 to a peak of 8.99 in 2012, the ratio declined significantly over the following two years, reaching a minimum of 6.74 in 2014. By 2015, the ratio recovered to 8.13, indicating a return toward historical efficiency levels in settling obligations.
Average Payables Payment Period
The duration of the payment cycle inversely mirrored the turnover trends. The period remained stable at 41 to 42 days during 2011 and 2012, but expanded considerably to 53 days in 2013 and peaked at 54 days in 2014. This represents a substantial increase in the time elapsed before payments were remitted to suppliers. In 2015, the period contracted to 45 days, signaling a shift toward accelerated settlement of liabilities.
Working Capital Implications
The extension of the payment period between 2012 and 2014 suggests a period of increased reliance on supplier credit to sustain liquidity or manage working capital requirements. The subsequent reduction in the payment period in 2015 indicates a reversal of this trend, which may be attributed to improved cash positions, changes in vendor agreements, or strategic efforts to enhance supplier relationships.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Cash Conversion Cycle

Baxter International Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 101 153 167 149 140
Average receivable collection period 63 61 70 62 64
Average payables payment period 45 54 53 41 42
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 119 160 184 170 162
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 101 + 63 – 45 = 119

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The overall cash conversion cycle exhibited significant volatility between 2011 and 2015, characterized by an initial expansion followed by a substantial contraction. The cycle peaked in 2013 at 184 days before decreasing to 119 days by the end of 2015, indicating a marked improvement in the efficiency of working capital management.

Average Inventory Processing Period
This metric served as the primary driver of fluctuations in the cash conversion cycle. A steady increase was observed from 140 days in 2011 to a peak of 167 days in 2013, suggesting a buildup of inventory or slower turnover. This trend reversed sharply in 2015, with the period falling to 101 days, reflecting a significant enhancement in inventory management efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 61 and 70 days. The consistency of this ratio suggests a stable approach to credit terms and collections processes.
Average Payables Payment Period
A gradual increase in the payment period was noted from 42 days in 2011 to a peak of 54 days in 2014, which effectively deferred cash outflows. However, this period contracted to 45 days in 2015, coinciding with the broader reduction in the cash conversion cycle.
Cash Conversion Cycle Synthesis
The cumulative effect of these components resulted in a peak cycle of 184 days in 2013. The subsequent reduction to 119 days in 2015 was predominantly achieved through the drastic reduction in the inventory processing period, which more than offset the slight decrease in the payables payment period.

AI Ask an analyst for more