- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The income tax profile over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021, is characterized by extreme volatility, transitioning from significant tax expenses to a substantial tax benefit in 2020, followed by a near-normalization in 2021.
- Overall Income Tax Provision Trends
- The total income tax provision experienced a sharp decline from a peak of 2,124 million US$ in 2017 to a significant tax benefit of 3,202 million US$ in 2020. This reversal represents a massive swing in the tax position, which shifted back to a modest expense of 118 million US$ by the end of 2021.
- Deferred Tax Provision Dynamics
- Deferred tax components served as the primary driver of total tax volatility. High provisions were recorded between 2017 and 2019, ranging from 1,364 million US$ to 2,071 million US$. A dramatic reversal occurred in 2020, where a deferred tax benefit of 3,110 million US$ was recognized, effectively offsetting nearly all other tax obligations for that year. By 2021, this figure stabilized at 114 million US$.
- Current Tax Provision Patterns
- The current tax provision remained relatively low compared to deferred taxes and frequently resulted in tax benefits. Benefit positions were observed in 2018, 2019, and 2020, with the largest benefit of 148 million US$ occurring in 2018. The provision returned to a positive value of 4 million US$ in 2021, indicating a return to minimal taxable current income.
- Correlation Between Current and Deferred Taxes
- The data indicates that total tax outcomes were disproportionately influenced by deferred tax adjustments rather than current tax obligations. The massive benefit realized in 2020 was almost entirely attributable to the deferred tax provision, suggesting significant accounting adjustments, such as the release of valuation allowances or the recognition of deferred tax assets during a period of fiscal distress.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The effective income tax rate (EITR) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a sharp initial decline followed by a substantial increase in the final year of the period. This trajectory reflects the combined impact of structural legislative changes and periodic accounting adjustments.
- Impact of Federal Statutory Rate Changes
- A fundamental shift occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate decreased from 35.00% to 21.00%. This reduction is the primary driver behind the drop in the EITR from 37.20% in 2017 to 23.60% in 2018. The 2017 rate was further elevated by a Tax Cuts and Jobs Act adjustment of 2.60%, whereas the statutory rate remained stable at 21.00% from 2018 through 2021.
- Effective Income Tax Rate Trajectory
- Following the 2018 correction, the EITR continued a gradual descent, reaching a period low of 20.50% in 2020. This trend suggests a period where the effective rate closely aligned with or dipped slightly below the federal statutory rate. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2021, with the EITR climbing to 29.80%, marking the highest rate since the statutory tax reform.
- Analysis of Variance Drivers
- The volatility observed in the latter part of the period is largely attributable to valuation allowances and permanent differences. In 2021, the EITR was driven upward by a 9.10% increase from valuation allowances and a 4.90% increase from permanent differences. These increases were partially mitigated by state taxes, which provided a negative contribution of -4.40% in 2021. Conversely, the 2020 low was supported by a negative valuation allowance adjustment of -2.60%, indicating a fluctuation in the recoverability of deferred tax assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The net deferred tax position exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, transitioning from a net asset position to a net liability in 2019, and subsequently returning to a net asset position in 2020 and 2021.
- Analysis of Deferred Tax Assets
- Deferred tax assets before valuation allowances grew from 6,134 million in 2017 to a peak of 9,527 million in 2020. This growth was primarily driven by a consistent increase in deferred revenue, which rose from 1,024 million in 2017 to 2,288 million in 2021. Net operating loss carryforwards showed significant fluctuation, declining to 560 million in 2019 before spiking to 1,495 million in 2020. Lease liabilities also became a prominent factor starting in 2018, increasing from 1,579 million to 2,452 million by 2021.
- Valuation Allowance Trends
- A notable shift in the valuation allowance is observed toward the end of the period. From 2017 to 2019, the allowance remained minimal, peaking at 58 million. However, it increased substantially to 460 million in 2020 and 833 million in 2021. This upward trend suggests a more conservative assessment of the probability that the full value of the deferred tax assets will be realized.
- Composition of Deferred Tax Liabilities
- Deferred tax liabilities increased from 5,180 million in 2017 to 7,291 million in 2021. Depreciation remained the primary driver of these liabilities, peaking at 5,190 million in 2019. Operating lease assets contributed an additional liability starting in 2018, which grew to 1,676 million by 2021. Liabilities related to intangible assets remained relatively stable, hovering around 1,050 million to 1,097 million throughout the five-year period.
- Net Deferred Tax Position Volatility
- The net position transitioned from a net asset of 935 million in 2017 to a net liability of 1,336 million in 2019. A sharp reversal occurred in 2020, resulting in a net asset of 1,988 million, which subsequently moderated to 1,294 million in 2021. This volatility reflects the interplay between increasing depreciation-related liabilities and the surge in net operating losses and deferred revenue recognized during 2020.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | 1,295) | 1,988) | 120) | 242) | 935) | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | —) | —) | 1,456) | 163) | —) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The deferred tax position of the organization exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by sharp fluctuations in both asset and liability balances that indicate substantial shifts in taxable temporary differences.
- Deferred Tax Asset Trajectory
- A consistent downward trend was observed from 2017 to 2019, with deferred tax assets decreasing from 935 million USD to a low of 120 million USD. This trend reversed abruptly in 2020, with assets surging to 1,988 million USD, representing a significant increase likely associated with the recognition of net operating loss carryforwards or other deductible temporary differences. A subsequent reduction to 1,295 million USD occurred by the end of 2021.
- Deferred Tax Liability Dynamics
- Deferred tax liabilities experienced a sharp escalation in 2019, rising to 1,456 million USD from 163 million USD in 2018. This spike suggests a substantial increase in taxable temporary differences during that fiscal year. The lack of reported liability balances for 2017, 2020, and 2021 suggests either a complete offset or a change in the reporting of these obligations.
- Net Deferred Tax Position Analysis
- The net deferred tax position transitioned from a net asset in 2017 and 2018 to a substantial net liability position in 2019. However, by 2020 and 2021, the company returned to a significant net asset position, driven primarily by the rapid accumulation of deferred tax assets during the 2020 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Delta Air Lines Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An analysis of the financial adjustments resulting from the removal of deferred taxes reveals a consistent divergence between reported and adjusted financial positions from 2017 through 2021. The adjustments generally amplify the volatility of the balance sheet and the income statement, particularly during periods of financial distress.
- Total Asset Trends
- Reported total assets exhibited a steady upward trajectory, growing from 53,292 million USD in 2017 to 72,459 million USD in 2021. Adjusted total assets followed a similar growth pattern but remained consistently lower than reported figures. The variance between reported and adjusted assets represents the impact of deferred tax assets, with the gap widening significantly in 2020 and 2021, indicating a higher reliance on deferred tax accounting during these years.
- Liability and Equity Dynamics
- Reported total liabilities increased substantially, particularly between 2019 and 2020, rising from 49,174 million USD to 70,462 million USD. While adjusted liabilities tracked closely with reported figures, the impact on stockholders' equity was profound. Reported equity remained positive throughout the period, though it dropped sharply to 1,534 million USD in 2020. In contrast, adjusted stockholders' equity fell into negative territory in 2020, reaching -454 million USD, which suggests that the removal of deferred tax assets reveals a more precarious capital position than reported.
- Net Income Volatility
- The removal of deferred taxes significantly alters the perception of profitability. From 2017 to 2019, adjusted net income was consistently higher than reported net income, suggesting that deferred tax provisions reduced reported earnings. However, during the 2020 fiscal year, the adjustment exacerbated losses; the reported loss of 12,385 million USD deepened to an adjusted loss of 15,495 million USD. By 2021, both reported and adjusted figures returned to positive territory, though the adjusted net income of 394 million USD remained higher than the reported 280 million USD.
- Overall Financial Impact
- The data indicates that deferred tax accounting serves as a buffer that smooths reported financial results. When these taxes are removed, the company's financial vulnerability becomes more apparent, as evidenced by the transition to negative adjusted equity in 2020 and the intensification of losses during the same period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Delta Air Lines Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An analysis of the financial ratios between 2017 and 2021 reveals a significant divergence between reported figures and adjusted figures resulting from the removal of deferred taxes. While both sets of metrics follow the same general trajectory—characterized by stability from 2017 to 2019, a severe contraction in 2020, and a partial recovery in 2021—the adjusted ratios consistently indicate higher underlying profitability and different leverage profiles.
- Profitability Margins and Asset Returns
- A consistent gap is observed between reported and adjusted net profit margins. From 2017 to 2019, adjusted margins remained several percentage points higher than reported margins, peaking at 13.27% in 2019 compared to the reported 10.14%. This trend extends to the Return on Assets (ROA), where adjusted values were systematically higher during the stable period and the 2021 recovery. In 2020, both metrics experienced a sharp decline, though the adjusted net profit margin showed a deeper contraction (-90.64%) than the reported margin (-72.45%), suggesting that the removal of deferred tax effects amplified the volatility of the loss during the crisis year.
- Equity Returns and Financial Leverage
- The impact of deferred taxes is most pronounced in the Return on Equity (ROE) and financial leverage ratios. Between 2017 and 2019, adjusted ROE significantly outperformed reported ROE, with adjusted figures ranging from 37.38% to 43.53%, while reported figures ranged from 25.72% to 31.04%. By 2021, the adjusted ROE of 15.19% was more than double the reported ROE of 7.20%. This divergence is mirrored in the financial leverage ratios; notably, in 2021, the adjusted financial leverage reached 27.44, considerably higher than the reported 18.64, indicating that deferred tax accounts significantly offset the appearance of leverage on the reported balance sheet.
- Operational Efficiency
- In contrast to profitability and leverage, total asset turnover exhibits minimal variance between reported and adjusted figures. The ratios remained nearly identical across the five-year period, with both metrics showing a decline from 2017 levels, a collapse to 0.24 in 2020, and a moderate recovery to approximately 0.41–0.42 by 2021. This suggests that the removal of deferred taxes has a negligible impact on the relationship between revenue generation and the total asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Operating revenue
= 100 × 280 ÷ 29,899 = 0.94%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Operating revenue
= 100 × 394 ÷ 29,899 = 1.32%
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a period of steady profitability followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent marginal recovery. Between 2017 and 2019, both reported and adjusted profitability metrics trended upward or remained stable, reflecting a period of operational efficiency before a sharp downturn in 2020.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Analysis
- The adjusted net profit margin remained strong from 2017 to 2019, ranging from 11.92% to 13.69%. This figure consistently exceeded the reported net profit margin during this timeframe, suggesting that adjustments for non-recurring items typically had a positive impact on the bottom line. However, in 2020, the adjusted net profit margin collapsed to -90.64%, representing a more significant decline than the reported margin of -72.45%.
- Net Income Divergence
- A distinct gap is observable between reported and adjusted net income. In the profitable years of 2017 through 2019, adjusted net income was consistently higher than reported figures. Conversely, during the 2020 crisis, the adjusted net loss of US$ 15,495 million was deeper than the reported loss of US$ 12,385 million, indicating that the adjustments applied in that year exacerbated the reported deficit.
- Recovery and Margin Compression
- A return to profitability is evident in 2021, with the adjusted net profit margin rising to 1.32% and the reported margin to 0.94%. Despite the recovery from the 2020 lows, these margins remain substantially lower than the pre-2020 levels, highlighting a significant compression in profit margins as the company transitioned back to positive earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Operating revenue ÷ Total assets
= 29,899 ÷ 72,459 = 0.41
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Operating revenue ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 29,899 ÷ 71,164 = 0.42
An analysis of asset utilization from 2017 to 2021 reveals a divergence between the growth of the asset base and the efficiency of asset employment. While total assets experienced a consistent upward trajectory, the asset turnover ratio suffered a significant contraction, reaching a nadir in 2020 before beginning a partial recovery.
- Asset Base Expansion
- Reported total assets grew steadily from 53,292 million US$ in 2017 to 72,459 million US$ by 2021. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical trajectory, increasing from 52,357 million US$ to 71,164 million US$ over the same period. This reflects a continuous increase in the company's total resource base over the five-year window.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Trends
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2019, moving from 0.79 to 0.73. A severe decline occurred in 2020, where the ratio dropped to 0.24, indicating a sharp reduction in the revenue generated per unit of adjusted asset. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with the ratio increasing to 0.42, though this figure remains substantially below the pre-2020 performance levels.
- Correlation Between Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- There is a high degree of correlation between reported and adjusted turnover ratios across all periods. In 2017, the adjusted turnover was slightly higher at 0.79 compared to the reported 0.77. By 2020 and 2021, the variance between the two metrics became minimal, suggesting that the adjustments applied to the asset base did not significantly alter the overall interpretation of operational efficiency during the period of highest volatility.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 72,459 ÷ 3,887 = 18.64
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 71,164 ÷ 2,593 = 27.44
Between 2017 and 2021, a consistent upward trajectory in total assets was observed, while stockholders' equity experienced severe volatility, leading to significant fluctuations in financial leverage ratios.
- Asset Growth Trends
- Reported total assets grew steadily from 53,292 million US dollars in 2017 to 72,459 million US dollars by 2021. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical pattern, increasing from 52,357 million US dollars to 71,164 million US dollars over the same period, indicating that adjustments to the asset base remained relatively marginal across the five-year span.
- Stockholders' Equity Volatility
- Equity levels remained stable between 2017 and 2019, with adjusted stockholders' equity peaking at 16,694 million US dollars in 2019. A critical contraction occurred in 2020, where reported equity fell to 1,534 million US dollars and adjusted equity dropped to a negative value of 454 million US dollars. A partial recovery was noted in 2021, with adjusted equity returning to a positive 2,593 million US dollars.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage remained within a tight range between 3.83 and 4.40 from 2017 to 2019. However, the precipitous decline in equity caused the reported leverage ratio to spike to 46.93 in 2020 before moderating to 18.64 in 2021. Adjusted financial leverage exhibited a similar trend of early stability, moving from 4.04 in 2017 to 3.86 in 2019. By 2021, the adjusted leverage ratio reached 27.44, which is significantly higher than the reported ratio for the same year, suggesting that tax-related or other accounting adjustments further amplified the perceived financial risk and leverage profile during the recovery phase.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 280 ÷ 3,887 = 7.20%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 394 ÷ 2,593 = 15.19%
The financial performance from 2017 through 2021 exhibits a period of steady growth followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent initial recovery phase. Between 2017 and 2019, both reported and adjusted net income showed consistent upward trajectories, peaking in 2019. However, 2020 marked a significant reversal, characterized by substantial losses and a critical reduction in stockholders' equity, before a modest recovery was recorded in 2021.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income increased from 3,577 million US$ in 2017 to 4,767 million US$ in 2019. This growth was mirrored by adjusted net income, which remained higher than reported figures during the same period. The 2020 fiscal year saw a precipitous decline to a reported loss of 12,385 million US$, with the adjusted loss deepening to 15,495 million US$. By 2021, the company returned to profitability, though reported net income remained low at 280 million US$.
- Stockholders' Equity Volatility
- Equity remained relatively stable from 2017 to 2019, with reported equity rising to 15,358 million US$ by the end of 2019. A drastic collapse occurred in 2020, where reported equity fell to 1,534 million US$ and adjusted equity entered negative territory at -454 million US$. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with reported equity increasing to 3,887 million US$.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- Reported ROE demonstrated a positive trend from 2017 (25.72%) to 2019 (31.04%) before plummeting to -807.37% in 2020, reflecting the combination of massive net losses and eroded equity. Adjusted ROE provided a higher perspective of profitability during the growth years, starting at 43.53% in 2017 and remaining above 37% through 2019. While adjusted ROE was not applicable in 2020 due to negative adjusted equity, it recovered to 15.19% in 2021, significantly outperforming the reported ROE of 7.20% for the same year.
The divergence between reported and adjusted metrics suggests the presence of significant non-recurring items or accounting adjustments that impacted the financial statements. The stark contrast in ROE figures indicates that while the company maintained high adjusted efficiency prior to 2020, the subsequent financial shock necessitated a comprehensive reconstruction of the equity base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 280 ÷ 72,459 = 0.39%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 394 ÷ 71,164 = 0.55%
The financial performance from 2017 through 2021 is characterized by a period of steady profitability and asset growth, followed by a severe contraction in 2020 and a marginal recovery in 2021. While total assets expanded consistently across the five-year period, net income and return on assets exhibited extreme volatility, particularly during the 2020 fiscal year.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income grew steadily from US$ 3,577 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 4,767 million in 2019. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, resulting in a reported loss of US$ 12,385 million. A partial recovery occurred in 2021, with reported net income returning to a positive US$ 280 million. Adjusted net income figures consistently amplify these movements, showing higher gains during profitable years and a deeper loss of US$ 15,495 million in 2020.
- Asset Base Expansion
- A consistent upward trajectory is observed in total assets. Reported total assets increased from US$ 53,292 million in 2017 to US$ 72,459 million by 2021. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical pattern, rising from US$ 52,357 million to US$ 71,164 million over the same period, indicating that asset adjustments remained relatively stable as a percentage of the total base.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- Reported ROA remained stable between 6.53% and 7.39% from 2017 to 2019 before collapsing to -17.20% in 2020. The recovery in 2021 was minimal, with Reported ROA reaching only 0.39%. Adjusted ROA demonstrated higher volatility, peaking at 10.79% in 2017 and falling to a more severe -22.13% in 2020. The persistent gap between reported and adjusted ROA suggests that underlying adjustments significantly impact the perceived efficiency of asset utilization.
- Comparison of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted metrics generally indicate higher performance during periods of profitability but exacerbate losses during downturns. This divergence is most evident in 2020, where the adjusted net loss was approximately US$ 3.1 billion greater than the reported loss, leading to a significantly lower adjusted ROA compared to the reported figure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?