Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

EMC Corp. (NYSE:EMC)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 8, 2016.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

EMC Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 7.80 7.20 6.56 6.72 7.76
Receivables turnover 6.21 5.54 6.01 6.32 6.81
Payables turnover 5.91 5.42 6.10 7.76 7.12
Working capital turnover 11.34 6.08 4.24 11.40 16.58
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 47 51 56 54 47
Add: Average receivable collection period 59 66 61 58 54
Operating cycle 106 117 117 112 101
Less: Average payables payment period 62 67 60 47 51
Cash conversion cycle 44 50 57 65 50

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of fluctuating operational efficiency, characterized by a mid-period decline in turnover ratios followed by a recovery toward baseline levels by the end of the analyzed timeframe.

Inventory and Receivables Management
Inventory turnover experienced a decline from 7.76 in 2011 to a low of 6.56 in 2013, which corresponds with the average inventory processing period peaking at 56 days. However, a recovery trend followed, returning to 7.80 by 2015. Receivables turnover showed a more consistent downward trend from 6.81 in 2011 to 5.54 in 2014, indicating a slowing of collections, as evidenced by the average receivable collection period increasing from 54 to 66 days over the same period. A correction occurred in 2015, with the collection period dropping to 59 days.
Payables and Working Capital Efficiency
Payables turnover decreased from a peak of 7.76 in 2012 to 5.42 in 2014, reflecting a strategic extension of the average payables payment period from 47 days to 67 days. This trend suggests an increased reliance on supplier financing to manage liquidity. Working capital turnover exhibited significant volatility, dropping sharply from 16.58 in 2011 to a minimum of 4.24 in 2013 before rebounding to 11.34 in 2015, suggesting a substantial fluctuation in the relationship between net working capital and annual sales.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle expanded from 101 days in 2011 to a plateau of 117 days in 2013 and 2014, driven by the simultaneous slowing of inventory and receivable turnovers. Despite this expansion, the cash conversion cycle demonstrated an overall improvement in the latter years. After peaking at 65 days in 2012, the cash conversion cycle declined steadily to 44 days by 2015. This improvement was achieved through the combination of returning inventory efficiency and the strategic extension of payment terms to creditors, resulting in a more streamlined cash flow position by the end of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

EMC Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenues 9,713 9,191 8,749 8,076 7,839
Inventories 1,245 1,276 1,334 1,201 1,010
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 7.80 7.20 6.56 6.72 7.76
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Inventories
= 9,713 ÷ 1,245 = 7.80

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data indicates a consistent increase in the cost of revenues over the five-year period, growing from US$ 7,839 million in 2011 to US$ 9,713 million in 2015. This steady upward trend suggests a continuous expansion in the scale of operations or rising input costs.

Inventory Volume Trends
Inventory levels showed an initial period of growth, rising from US$ 1,010 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 1,334 million in 2013. This was followed by a gradual reduction in held inventory, which declined to US$ 1,245 million by December 31, 2015.
Inventory Turnover Efficiency
The inventory turnover ratio followed a U-shaped trajectory. A decline was observed from 2011 to 2013, with the ratio dropping from 7.76 to 6.56, indicating a slower movement of goods relative to the cost of revenues. Subsequently, efficiency improved, with the ratio ascending to 7.20 in 2014 and reaching 7.80 in 2015.

The recovery in the turnover ratio after 2013 coincides with the reduction in total inventory value, suggesting an improvement in inventory management and a more efficient conversion of stock into revenue, ultimately returning to 2011 efficiency levels by the end of the observed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Receivables Turnover

EMC Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues 24,704 24,440 23,222 21,714 20,008
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts 3,977 4,413 3,861 3,433 2,937
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 6.21 5.54 6.01 6.32 6.81
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
= 24,704 ÷ 3,977 = 6.21

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by consistent revenue growth coupled with fluctuating efficiency in receivables management. While top-line growth remained steady, the effectiveness of converting receivables into cash experienced a period of decline before recovering in the final year of the observed period.

Revenue Growth
Revenues exhibited a continuous upward trajectory, increasing from 20,008 million US dollars in 2011 to 24,704 million US dollars in 2015. This represents steady expansion of sales volume throughout the five-year duration.
Accounts and Notes Receivable Trends
Receivables grew consistently from 2011 through 2014, rising from 2,937 million US dollars to a peak of 4,413 million US dollars. A notable reversal occurred in 2015, where the balance decreased to 3,977 million US dollars despite the continued increase in total revenues.
Receivables Turnover Performance
A downward trend in the receivables turnover ratio was observed between 2011 and 2014, with the ratio falling from 6.81 to 5.54. This decline indicates that receivables were increasing at a faster rate than revenues, suggesting a slowdown in the collection cycle or an expansion of credit terms. However, the ratio recovered to 6.21 in 2015, signaling improved collection efficiency or a more stringent credit policy as the company reduced its outstanding receivables balance while increasing sales.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Payables Turnover

EMC Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenues 9,713 9,191 8,749 8,076 7,839
Accounts payable 1,644 1,696 1,434 1,041 1,102
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 5.91 5.42 6.10 7.76 7.12
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= 9,713 ÷ 1,644 = 5.91

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2011 and 2015, cost of revenues exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from 7,839 million US$ to 9,713 million US$. Concurrently, accounts payable showed a general growth trend, rising from 1,102 million US$ in 2011 to 1,644 million US$ by the end of 2015, notwithstanding a marginal decrease in 2012.

Payables Turnover Ratio Trends
The payables turnover ratio fluctuated over the observed period, peaking at 7.76 in 2012 before experiencing a significant decline to 5.42 by 2014. A moderate recovery was noted in 2015, with the ratio increasing to 5.91.
Payment Cycle Analysis
The downward trend in the turnover ratio between 2012 and 2014 indicates a lengthening of the average time taken to settle obligations with suppliers. This pattern suggests an intentional shift in working capital management to preserve liquidity or the negotiation of more favorable credit terms with vendors.
Operational Correlation
Although costs of revenues grew steadily each year, the disproportionate increase in accounts payable from 2012 to 2014 drove the turnover ratio lower. The stabilization observed in 2015, where the ratio rose slightly while payables decreased, indicates a recalibration of the payment schedule relative to procurement costs.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Working Capital Turnover

EMC Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 15,063 15,733 17,278 12,209 11,583
Less: Current liabilities 12,885 11,710 11,799 10,304 10,376
Working capital 2,178 4,023 5,479 1,905 1,206
 
Revenues 24,704 24,440 23,222 21,714 20,008
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 11.34 6.08 4.24 11.40 16.58
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= 24,704 ÷ 2,178 = 11.34

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operational efficiency indicates a fluctuating relationship between working capital management and revenue generation over the five-year period from 2011 to 2015. While revenues exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, working capital experienced significant volatility, leading to substantial variances in the working capital turnover ratio.

Revenue Performance
A steady increase in revenues is observed, rising from US$ 20,008 million in 2011 to US$ 24,704 million by 2015. This consistent growth suggests a stable expansion of the company's market activities and top-line performance.
Working Capital Fluctuations
Working capital demonstrated significant instability, characterized by a sharp increase that peaked at US$ 5,479 million in 2013. Following this peak, a contraction occurred over the subsequent two years, with the balance returning to US$ 2,178 million by December 31, 2015.
Working Capital Turnover Trends
The working capital turnover ratio shows an inverse correlation with the growth of working capital. The ratio declined from 16.58 in 2011 to a period low of 4.24 in 2013, indicating a marked decrease in the efficiency of utilizing short-term assets to generate sales. However, a recovery trend is evident from 2014 onward, with the ratio increasing to 11.34 by 2015, effectively returning to efficiency levels similar to those recorded in 2012.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Inventory Processing Period

EMC Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 7.80 7.20 6.56 6.72 7.76
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 47 51 56 54 47
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.80 = 47

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a cyclical pattern in inventory management between 2011 and 2015, characterized by a mid-period decline in efficiency followed by a full recovery to baseline levels.

Inventory Turnover
A contraction in turnover efficiency occurred between 2011 and 2013, with the ratio declining from 7.76 to a low of 6.56. This downward trend indicates a slower rate of inventory replacement during this interval. Starting in 2014, a reversal is observed, as the ratio climbed to 7.20 and reached 7.80 by the end of 2015, suggesting a strengthened velocity of goods moving through the system.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The processing period exhibited a direct inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. The time required to process inventory increased from 47 days in 2011 to a peak of 56 days in 2013, reflecting a slowdown in operational throughput. Subsequent years show a corrective trend, with the period shortening to 51 days in 2014 and returning to 47 days in 2015, effectively eliminating the delays observed during the 2012-2013 period.

Overall, the metrics indicate that operational efficiency peaked in 2011, deteriorated through 2013, and was systematically restored over the following two years. The alignment of the 2015 figures with 2011 levels suggests a return to a previous optimal state of inventory processing.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Receivable Collection Period

EMC Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 6.21 5.54 6.01 6.32 6.81
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 59 66 61 58 54
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.21 = 59

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a period of declining efficiency in receivable management from 2011 through 2014, followed by a notable recovery in 2015. A consistent inverse correlation is observed between the receivables turnover ratio and the average receivable collection period throughout the period under review.

Receivables Turnover Performance
A steady decline in the turnover ratio was observed from 2011 to 2014, falling from 6.81 to a low of 5.54. This downward trajectory indicates a slowing rate of receivable conversion into cash. This trend was reversed in 2015, as the ratio increased to 6.21, suggesting a restoration of collection efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period Trends
The average collection period experienced a progressive increase from 54 days in 2011 to a peak of 66 days in 2014. This expansion of the collection cycle represents a lengthening of the time required to realize cash from credit sales. A significant improvement occurred in 2015, with the period shortening to 59 days, reflecting more effective credit management or faster customer payments.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Operating Cycle

EMC Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 47 51 56 54 47
Average receivable collection period 59 66 61 58 54
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 106 117 117 112 101
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 47 + 59 = 106

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibited a period of expansion between 2011 and 2014, followed by a contraction in 2015. The overall trend indicates a temporary decline in operational efficiency that was largely corrected by the end of the observed period.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The duration required to process inventory increased from 47 days in 2011 to a peak of 56 days in 2013. Following this peak, a downward trend is observed, with the period returning to 47 days by December 31, 2015, suggesting a restoration of previous inventory management efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A steady increase in the collection period occurred from 2011 to 2014, rising from 54 days to 66 days. This trend suggests a gradual slowdown in the conversion of receivables into cash. However, this trend reversed in 2015, with the collection period decreasing to 59 days.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle lengthened from 101 days in 2011 to a plateau of 117 days across 2013 and 2014. This expansion was the result of concurrent increases in both inventory processing and receivable collection times. By December 31, 2015, the cycle contracted to 106 days, reflecting a synchronized improvement in both components of the short-term operating activity.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Payables Payment Period

EMC Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 5.91 5.42 6.10 7.76 7.12
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 62 67 60 47 51
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.91 = 62

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios between 2011 and 2015 indicates a fluctuating trend in the management of supplier obligations, characterized by a notable extension of payment terms during the middle of the observed period.

Payables Turnover
A peak in turnover was observed in 2012 at 7.76, followed by a sustained decline over the next two years, reaching a minimum of 5.42 in 2014. A moderate upward correction occurred in 2015, with the ratio increasing to 5.91.
Average Payables Payment Period
The duration required to settle obligations to suppliers reached a minimum of 47 days in 2012. Subsequently, a period of significant expansion occurred, with the payment period increasing to 60 days in 2013 and peaking at 67 days in 2014. This trend reversed slightly in 2015, as the average payment period decreased to 62 days.

The inverse relationship between the turnover ratio and the payment period is consistent throughout the timeframe. The expansion of the payment cycle through 2014 suggests a shift toward the preservation of cash flow by extending the time taken to remunerate creditors, while the 2015 figures indicate a slight tightening of this policy.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Cash Conversion Cycle

EMC Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 47 51 56 54 47
Average receivable collection period 59 66 61 58 54
Average payables payment period 62 67 60 47 51
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 44 50 57 65 50
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. — — — — —
Analog Devices Inc. — — — — —
Applied Materials Inc. — — — — —
Broadcom Inc. — — — — —
Intel Corp. — — — — —
KLA Corp. — — — — —
Lam Research Corp. — — — — —
Marvell Technology Inc. — — — — —
Micron Technology Inc. — — — — —
NVIDIA Corp. — — — — —
Qualcomm Inc. — — — — —
Texas Instruments Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 47 + 59 – 62 = 44

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios reveals a volatile but ultimately improving trend in the management of working capital between 2011 and 2015. The cash conversion cycle experienced a peak in 2012 before entering a consistent downward trajectory, indicating enhanced efficiency in converting resources into cash by the end of the period.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory management showed a period of decreased efficiency between 2012 and 2013, with the processing period increasing from 47 days to a peak of 56 days. This trend reversed after 2013, with the period returning to 47 days by 2015, suggesting a restoration of inventory turnover rates to 2011 levels.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A steady increase in the time required to collect receivables was observed from 2011 to 2014, rising from 54 days to a peak of 66 days. This trend was reversed in 2015, when the collection period decreased to 59 days, reflecting a more effective recovery of outstanding credits.
Average Payables Payment Period
Payment terms to suppliers were extended significantly between 2012 and 2014, increasing from 47 days to 67 days. While this period moderated to 62 days in 2015, the overall increase compared to 2011 levels indicates a strategic shift toward utilizing supplier credit to finance operations.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The overall cycle reached a maximum of 65 days in 2012 but declined steadily thereafter to reach a minimum of 44 days by 2015. The reduction in the cycle was facilitated by the combined effect of stabilizing inventory levels, improving collection efficiency in the final year, and maintaining longer payment terms for payables.

AI Ask an analyst for more