Stock Analysis on Net

EMC Corp. (NYSE:EMC)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 8, 2016.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

EMC Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2015 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


A longitudinal analysis of the financial performance from 2011 to 2015 reveals a persistent and accelerating erosion of economic value. The organization consistently failed to generate operating profits sufficient to cover the cost of its invested capital, resulting in negative economic profit throughout the entire five-year period.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT exhibited a period of modest growth between 2011 and 2013, peaking at 4,442 million. However, a significant downward trend emerged thereafter, with profit levels falling to 3,737 million in 2014 and further declining to 2,862 million by 2015. This represents a contraction of approximately 35.5% from the 2013 peak.
Invested Capital and Capital Efficiency
There was a consistent year-over-year increase in invested capital, rising from 24,594 million in 2011 to 33,788 million in 2015. The continuous expansion of the capital base, occurring simultaneously with declining operating profits after 2013, indicates a diminishing return on invested capital.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital remained relatively stable and high, fluctuating within a narrow range between 20.54% and 22.10%. This high hurdle rate exerted constant pressure on the organization's ability to achieve positive economic profit.
Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit demonstrated a continuous decline, moving from -1,110 million in 2011 to -4,078 million in 2015. The deficit widened significantly in 2014 and 2015, driven by the divergence between an expanding capital base and shrinking operating profits. This pattern confirms an increasing destruction of shareholder value over the analyzed period.

The combined effect of rising invested capital and falling NOPAT, coupled with a stagnant and high cost of capital, led to a severe deterioration in economic performance. The transition from a deficit of 1,110 million to over 4,000 million underscores a critical failure to align capital investment with value-generating operating results.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

EMC Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in product warranty obligations4
Increase (decrease) in restructuring5
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents6
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability7
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense8
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes9
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income10
Investment income, after taxes11
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty obligations.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring.

6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to EMC Corporation.

7 2015 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

8 2015 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 35.00% =

9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to EMC Corporation.

10 2015 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 35.00% =

11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data over the five-year period reveals notable shifts in profitability metrics for the company.

Net Income Attributable to EMC Corporation
This indicator demonstrates an initial upward trajectory from 2011 to 2013, increasing from 2,461 million US dollars to a peak of 2,889 million US dollars. Subsequently, net income declined in the following years, dropping to 2,714 million US dollars in 2014 and falling more sharply to 1,990 million US dollars by the end of 2015. This downward trend in the latter years suggests challenges affecting net profitability.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT shows a relatively stable pattern in the first three years, with a slight increase from 4,267 million US dollars in 2011 to 4,442 million US dollars in 2013. However, in 2014, NOPAT decreased significantly to 3,737 million US dollars and continued to decline to 2,862 million US dollars in 2015. The decline in NOPAT aligns with the reduction in net income, indicating reduced operating efficiency or higher operating expenses.

Overall, the financial trends indicate a strengthening in profitability during the initial years, followed by a period of contraction in both net income and operating profit after taxes. The data suggests the company faced operational or market challenges after 2013 that adversely impacted earnings and operating performance.


Cash Operating Taxes

EMC Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes demonstrates a fluctuating pattern over the five-year period. It increased notably from US$640 million in 2011 to a peak of US$918 million in 2012. This was followed by a decline to US$772 million in 2013. Subsequently, the provision rose again in 2014 to US$868 million, before decreasing to US$710 million in 2015. Overall, the provision shows variability without a consistent upward or downward trend, suggesting changes in taxable income or tax rates during the analyzed years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes display a general increasing trend from 2011 to 2014, rising from US$739 million to US$1309 million. This represents a significant growth in actual cash payments for income taxes. However, in 2015, cash operating taxes decrease to US$992 million. Despite this drop, the values for 2015 remain considerably higher than the initial amount in 2011. The rising trend through 2014 followed by a decline in 2015 could indicate changes in the timing of tax payments, tax planning strategies, or variations in taxable income.
Comparison Between Provision for Income Taxes and Cash Operating Taxes
Throughout the period, cash operating taxes consistently exceed the provision for income taxes each year. The gap between cash taxes and provisions widens in 2012 and remains substantial through 2014, suggesting that actual tax payments were higher than the accounting estimates reflected in the provisions. By 2015, while both items decreased, cash payments still remained well above provisions. This pattern may indicate timing differences between tax accruals and payments, or adjustments in working capital related to tax obligations.

Invested Capital

EMC Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Notes converted and payable
Short-term debt
Current portion of convertible debt
Long-term debt
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total EMC Corporation’s shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Product warranty obligations5
Restructuring6
Equity equivalents7
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax8
Non-controlling interests
Adjusted total EMC Corporation’s shareholders’ equity
Building construction in progress9
Short- and long-term investments10
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of product warranty obligations.

6 Addition of restructuring.

7 Addition of equity equivalents to total EMC Corporation’s shareholders’ equity.

8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

9 Subtraction of building construction in progress.

10 Subtraction of short- and long-term investments.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit significant fluctuations over the analyzed periods. There is a notable decrease from 4,450 million USD at the end of 2011 to 2,942 million USD at the end of 2012, indicating a substantial reduction in debt within that year. However, this trend reverses sharply in 2013, with debt increasing to 8,530 million USD. Subsequently, it declines in 2014 to 7,199 million USD before rising again in 2015 to 8,562 million USD. Overall, the company experienced volatile debt levels with an upward tendency in the latter years.
Total EMC Corporation’s Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity shows a generally stable trend across the five-year period. It increased from 18,959 million USD in 2011 to 22,357 million USD in 2012, followed by minor fluctuations in subsequent years: a slight decrease to 22,301 million USD in 2013, a further small decline to 21,896 million USD in 2014, and another decrease to 21,140 million USD in 2015. This pattern suggests a modest erosion of equity after a strong initial increase.
Invested Capital
Invested capital demonstrates consistent growth throughout the period. Starting at 24,594 million USD in 2011, it rises steadily each year, reaching 27,392 million USD in 2012, then moving up to 31,439 million USD in 2013, 32,268 million USD in 2014, and finally peaking at 33,788 million USD in 2015. This continual increase indicates ongoing investment and resource allocation expansion within the company.
Summary of Financial Trends
The contrasting movements between debt levels and shareholders’ equity reflect changing financing strategies. The initial reduction in debt was followed by sharp increases, whereas equity experienced a peak early on and then a gradual decline. Invested capital's steady rise suggests active growth or asset acquisition. The data imply that the company may have shifted toward greater leverage in later years to support its investments. These trends highlight a dynamic approach to capital structure management with a balanced focus on growth and financing costs.

Cost of Capital

EMC Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

EMC Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2015 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2011 and 2015 exhibits a consistent trend of economic value destruction, characterized by expanding negative economic profit and a deteriorating economic spread ratio despite an increase in the total capital invested in the business.

Economic Profit
A significant downward trajectory is observed in economic profit, which transitioned from a deficit of 1,110 million US$ in 2011 to a deficit of 4,078 million US$ by 2015. This steady decline indicates that the company failed to generate returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital throughout the five-year period, with the scale of value destruction increasing nearly fourfold.
Invested Capital
Invested capital showed continuous growth, rising from 24,594 million US$ in 2011 to 33,788 million US$ in 2015. The upward trend in capital deployment occurred simultaneously with the decline in economic profit, suggesting that additional investments did not yield a positive economic return.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio reflects a progressive decline in capital efficiency. The ratio moved from -4.51% in 2011 to -12.07% in 2015. This widening negative spread demonstrates that the gap between the actual return on invested capital and the cost of capital expanded significantly over time, peaking in 2015.

The convergence of increasing invested capital and a worsening economic spread ratio suggests a systemic inability to convert capital expenditures into economic value. The acceleration of the negative spread in 2014 and 2015 highlights a period of intensified value erosion.


Economic Profit Margin

EMC Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Revenues
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2015 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by a consistent deterioration in economic value creation. Despite an initial period of revenue growth, the organization failed to generate returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital, resulting in widening economic losses over the five-year period.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit exhibited a continuous decline, moving from a deficit of 1,110 million USD in 2011 to a deficit of 4,078 million USD by 2015. This steady increase in negative economic profit indicates a growing gap between the net operating profit and the required return on capital employed.
Adjusted Revenue Trajectory
Adjusted revenues demonstrated a general upward trend between 2011 and 2014, rising from 21,518 million USD to a peak of 25,626 million USD. This growth trend reversed in 2015, with revenues contracting to 25,341 million USD.
Economic Profit Margin Erosion
The economic profit margin experienced a significant and accelerating decline, starting at -5.16% in 2011 and reaching -16.09% by 2015. The fact that the margin deteriorated while revenues were increasing between 2011 and 2014 suggests that the cost of capital or operating expenses grew disproportionately to top-line growth, severely impacting the overall economic efficiency of the business.