Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 29, 2019.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

HP Inc., EBITDA calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Oct 31, 2018 Oct 31, 2017 Oct 31, 2016 Oct 31, 2015 Oct 31, 2014 Oct 31, 2013
Net earnings 5,327 2,526 2,496 4,554 5,013 5,113
Less: Net loss from discontinued operations — — (170) — — —
Add: Income tax expense (2,314) 750 1,095 178 1,544 1,397
Earnings before tax (EBT) 3,013 3,276 3,761 4,732 6,557 6,510
Add: Interest expense on borrowings 312 309 273 327 344 426
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 3,325 3,585 4,034 5,059 6,901 6,936
Add: Depreciation and amortization 528 354 332 4,061 4,334 4,611
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 3,853 3,939 4,366 9,120 11,235 11,547

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).


A comprehensive review of the financial performance from 2013 to 2018 reveals a sustained decline in operational profitability metrics, contrasted by significant volatility in net earnings. While core operational earnings decreased steadily over the period, the final net result in the last reported year shows a sharp divergence from operating trends.

EBITDA Trend
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization experienced a consistent downward trajectory, falling from 11,547 million US$ in 2013 to 3,853 million US$ in 2018. The most pronounced contraction occurred between 2015 and 2016, where the value decreased by approximately 52%.
Operational Earnings (EBIT and EBT)
Both EBIT and EBT followed a pattern of attrition similar to EBITDA. EBIT declined from 6,936 million US$ in 2013 to 3,325 million US$ in 2018, indicating a reduction in profitability before the impact of financial structure and taxes. EBT mirrored this decline, moving from 6,510 million US$ in 2013 to 3,013 million US$ in 2018.
Net Earnings Divergence
Net earnings exhibited high volatility, dipping to 2,496 million US$ in 2016 before surging to a period high of 5,327 million US$ in 2018. This recovery in the bottom line is notable because it occurred despite the continued decline in EBITDA, EBIT, and EBT, suggesting the influence of non-operating income, extraordinary gains, or tax adjustments in the 2018 fiscal year.
Depreciation and Amortization Impact
The margin between EBITDA and EBIT narrowed significantly over the six-year period. In 2013, the difference was 4,611 million US$, whereas by 2018, the difference reduced to 528 million US$, indicating a substantial decrease in annual depreciation and amortization expenses.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

HP Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 27,629
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 3,853
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 7.17
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Apple Inc. 34.78
Arista Networks Inc. 57.78
Cisco Systems Inc. 21.69
Dell Technologies Inc. 31.88
Lumentum Holdings Inc. —
Super Micro Computer Inc. 11.13

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

HP Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Oct 31, 2018 Oct 31, 2017 Oct 31, 2016 Oct 31, 2015 Oct 31, 2014 Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 35,448 34,944 27,000 29,583 77,821 64,390
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 3,853 3,939 4,366 9,120 11,235 11,547
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 9.20 8.87 6.18 3.24 6.93 5.58
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Apple Inc. — — — — — —
Arista Networks Inc. — — — — — —
Cisco Systems Inc. — — — — — —
Dell Technologies Inc. — — — — — —
Lumentum Holdings Inc. — — — — — —
Super Micro Computer Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2018 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 35,448 ÷ 3,853 = 9.20

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial trajectory between 2013 and 2018 is characterized by a significant contraction in operational earnings and substantial volatility in enterprise valuation. While both enterprise value and EBITDA ended the period lower than their initial 2013 levels, the valuation multiple expanded significantly in the latter half of the period.

Enterprise Value Trends
Enterprise value experienced a peak in October 2014 at 77,821 million USD, followed by a sharp decline to 29,583 million USD by October 2015. After this correction, the value stabilized and entered a moderate recovery phase, ascending to 35,448 million USD by October 2018.
EBITDA Performance
A persistent downward trend is observed in EBITDA, which fell from 11,547 million USD in 2013 to 3,853 million USD in 2018. The most acute decline occurred between 2015 and 2016, during which earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization decreased by approximately 52%.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Dynamics
The EV/EBITDA ratio fluctuated significantly, reaching a period low of 3.24 in 2015. Subsequently, the ratio climbed steadily each year, reaching 9.20 by October 2018. This upward trend in the multiple, occurring simultaneously with declining EBITDA, indicates that the enterprise value did not contract at the same rate as operational earnings, leading to a higher relative valuation of the business over time.

AI Ask an analyst for more