Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment from 2015 to 2019 reveals a trend of relative stability in gross asset value contrasted with a consistent decline in net book value. While gross property, plant, and equipment peaked in 2017 at US$ 54,330 million, the net value decreased from US$ 40,547 million in 2015 to US$ 36,419 million in 2019.
- Asset Composition and Growth
- Equipment represents the largest and most consistently growing asset category, increasing from US$ 22,979 million in 2015 to US$ 25,791 million in 2019. In contrast, pipeline assets remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 19,341 million and US$ 20,157 million. Land and land rights-of-way showed a slight downward trajectory, ending the period at US$ 1,356 million.
- Capital Investment and Construction
- Construction work in process exhibited significant volatility, reaching a peak of US$ 2,995 million in 2017 before declining sharply to US$ 1,006 million by 2019. This reduction suggests a deceleration in new large-scale capital projects or the transition of completed projects into active service assets.
- Depreciation and Net Valuation
- A steady increase in accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization is observed, rising from US$ 10,851 million in 2015 to US$ 16,950 million in 2019. This consistent growth in accumulated charges has outpaced the growth of gross assets, resulting in a sustained erosion of the net book value of the company's physical infrastructure over the five-year period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent trend of asset aging. The average age ratio demonstrates a steady increase, indicating that a larger proportion of the assets' estimated useful lives has been consumed over time.
- Average Age Ratio
- A consistent upward trajectory is observed, with the ratio rising from 21.72% in 2015 to 32.59% in 2019. This represents a total increase of 10.87 percentage points, reflecting a steady advancement in the depletion of the asset base.
- Asset Life Cycle Dynamics
- The estimated total useful life remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 24 and 26 years. Concurrently, the estimated age, or time elapsed since purchase, increased from 5 years in 2015 to 8 years in 2019. The stability of the total useful life alongside the increase in elapsed time confirms a natural aging process of the infrastructure without significant adjustments to the expected longevity of the assets.
- Remaining Asset Utility
- The estimated remaining life showed a gradual decline, maintaining a plateau of 19 years between 2015 and 2017 before decreasing to 16 years by the end of 2019. This reduction in remaining life indicates that the window for future utility is narrowing, which may suggest a future requirement for capital expenditures to replace or modernize aging assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land and land rights-of-way)
= 100 × 16,950 ÷ (53,369 – 1,356) = 32.59%
The analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) accounts from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent aging of the company's asset base. While the gross value of assets remained relatively stable, there was a steady accumulation of depreciation, which drove an upward trend in the average age of the infrastructure.
- Average Age Ratio
- A significant and linear increase in the average age ratio is observed, rising from 21.72% in 2015 to 32.59% in 2019. This upward trajectory indicates that the asset base is moving further through its estimated useful life, suggesting that the pace of asset depreciation is exceeding the pace of new capital investment in depreciable assets.
- Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization
- Accumulated depreciation shows a continuous increase over the five-year period, growing from US$ 10,851 million in 2015 to US$ 16,950 million in 2019. This represents a total increase of approximately 56%, reflecting the ongoing wear and tear of the operational infrastructure.
- Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment
- Gross PP&E remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating between a low of US$ 51,011 million in 2016 and a peak of US$ 54,330 million in 2017, ending at US$ 53,369 million in 2019. The lack of substantial growth in gross assets, when contrasted with the rising accumulated depreciation, confirms a trend of asset aging rather than aggressive expansion.
- Land and Land Rights-of-Way
- Land assets and rights-of-way experienced a marginal decline, decreasing from US$ 1,450 million in 2015 to US$ 1,356 million in 2019. This slight contraction indicates minimal acquisition of new land rights and suggests that the overall asset strategy focused on the maintenance and utilization of existing holdings rather than geographical expansion.
In summary, the financial data indicates a transition toward an older asset profile. The steady rise in the average age ratio, coupled with stable gross PP&E and increasing accumulated depreciation, suggests that the company is in a phase of utilizing existing capacity rather than engaging in significant new capital expenditure for infrastructure growth.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land and land rights-of-way) ÷ Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense charged against property, plant and equipment
= (53,369 – 1,356) ÷ 2,176 = 24
The asset base exhibits relative stability between 2015 and 2019, with gross property, plant, and equipment fluctuating within a narrow range. While there was a peak in 2017, the overall trajectory suggests a maintained capital investment level rather than aggressive expansion or significant divestment.
- Gross Asset Trends
- Gross property, plant, and equipment moved from 51,398 million US dollars in 2015 to 53,369 million US dollars by 2019. Land and land rights-of-way showed a gradual decline over the five-year period, decreasing from 1,450 million US dollars to 1,356 million US dollars.
- Depreciation and Useful Life Correlation
- Annual depreciation, depletion, and amortization expenses remained relatively consistent, ranging from 1,970 million to 2,176 million US dollars. A relationship is observable between the estimated total useful life of assets and the annual expense charged; the peak in estimated useful life at 26 years in 2017 coincided with a period of increased gross assets, which effectively tempered the annual depreciation charge relative to the total asset base.
- Useful Life Variability
- The estimated total useful life of assets experienced slight volatility, increasing from 24 years in 2015 to a peak of 26 years in 2017 before reverting to 24 years by 2019. This fluctuation indicates periodic reassessments of asset longevity or shifts in the underlying composition of the asset portfolio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization ÷ Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense charged against property, plant and equipment
= 16,950 ÷ 2,176 = 8
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment indicates a consistent aging of the asset base and a steady accumulation of depreciation over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- A continuous upward trajectory is observed in accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization, which rose from US$ 10,851 million in 2015 to US$ 16,950 million by the end of 2019. This represents a total increase of approximately 56.2%, reflecting the systematic allocation of the cost of tangible assets over their respective useful lives.
- Annual Depreciation Expense Stability
- Annual depreciation, depletion, and amortization expenses remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 1,970 million and US$ 2,176 million. The slight decline observed in 2016 was followed by a gradual increase, suggesting a consistent level of capital asset utilization and a steady rate of asset consumption throughout the period.
- Asset Age Progression
- The time elapsed since purchase increased from 5 years in 2015 to 8 years in 2019. This progression indicates a maturing asset portfolio. The plateau observed between 2017 and 2018, where the elapsed time remained constant at 7 years, suggests a period where capital expenditures or acquisitions may have offset the natural aging of the existing infrastructure.
The relationship between the stable annual expense and the rising accumulated depreciation suggests a strategy of maintaining existing infrastructure rather than engaging in a large-scale cycle of asset replacement or disposal during this timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land and land rights-of-way) ÷ Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense charged against property, plant and equipment
= (36,419 – 1,356) ÷ 2,176 = 16
An analysis of the asset base between 2015 and 2019 reveals a general contraction in the net value of property, plant, and equipment alongside a reduction in the estimated useful life of those assets.
- Net Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
- Net property, plant, and equipment experienced a overall decline, decreasing from 40,547 million US dollars in 2015 to 36,419 million US dollars by 2019. This downward trajectory is mirrored in the valuation of land and land rights-of-way, which fell from 1,450 million US dollars to 1,356 million US dollars over the same period.
- Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization (DD&A) Dynamics
- Despite the reduction in the total net book value of assets, DD&A expenses exhibited a contrary trend. Expenses rose from 2,059 million US dollars in 2015 to 2,176 million US dollars in 2019. The divergence between declining asset values and increasing depreciation charges suggests a higher rate of asset consumption relative to new capital investment.
- Asset Lifecycle and Estimated Remaining Life
- The estimated remaining life of the asset base remained constant at 19 years from 2015 through 2017. However, a downward shift occurred in the subsequent years, decreasing to 18 years in 2018 and further to 16 years by the end of 2019. This acceleration in the reduction of estimated remaining life, coupled with the increasing DD&A expense, indicates an aging infrastructure and a potential shift in the depreciation schedule or asset utility assumptions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?