Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a period of consistent expansion, followed by a severe contraction in 2020 and a subsequent partial recovery in 2021.
- EBITDA Growth and Volatility
- From 2017 to 2019, EBITDA exhibited a steady upward trend, increasing from 1,488 million to 1,858 million. This growth was abruptly reversed in 2020, when the metric fell to a deficit of 1,723 million. By 2021, EBITDA rebounded to 1,127 million, representing a significant recovery in operational cash flow, although the value remained below pre-2020 levels.
- Net Income and Bottom-Line Impact
- Net income mirrored the general trend of EBITDA but demonstrated higher sensitivity. After reaching a peak of 565 million in 2019, the company incurred a substantial net loss of 2,612 million in 2020. The 2021 results indicate a return to marginal profitability with a net income of 12 million, suggesting that while operational recovery was underway, the bottom line remained heavily impacted.
- Operating Performance (EBIT and EBT)
- EBIT peaked at 948 million in 2019 before collapsing to a loss of 2,791 million in 2020. While EBIT returned to a positive 313 million in 2021, Earnings Before Tax (EBT) remained negative at 38 million. This divergence suggests that non-operating expenses or interest obligations continued to weigh on the company's pre-tax earnings despite the return to positive operating income.
- Analysis of Depreciation and Amortization Impact
- The significant gap between EBIT and EBITDA is most evident in 2021, where EBITDA was 1,127 million compared to an EBIT of 313 million. This indicates that non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization played a substantial role in reducing reported operating profit during the recovery year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 27,553) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 1,127) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.45 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Amazon.com Inc. | 16.09 |
| Home Depot Inc. | 13.80 |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 11.61 |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 16.21 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 30.53 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.52 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 33,864) | 27,651) | 19,078) | 21,786) | 18,262) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 1,127) | (1,723) | 1,858) | 1,676) | 1,488) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 30.05 | — | 10.27 | 13.00 | 12.27 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 21.27 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 16.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 14.41 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 65.35 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 20.16 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.51 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 33,864 ÷ 1,127 = 30.05
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility, particularly in operational profitability and valuation multiples. While the enterprise value exhibited a long-term upward trend, the period was marked by a severe disruption in earnings during 2020, resulting in a stark expansion of the valuation multiple by 2021.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The enterprise value increased from 18,262 million US$ in 2017 to 33,864 million US$ in 2021. Despite a brief contraction in 2019 to 19,078 million US$, a sharp acceleration occurred in 2020, where the value rose to 27,651 million US$, continuing its upward climb through 2021.
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
- Operational performance showed consistent growth from 2017 to 2019, with EBITDA rising from 1,488 million US$ to a peak of 1,858 million US$. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, with earnings collapsing to -1,723 million US$. A recovery was evident in 2021 as EBITDA returned to a positive 1,127 million US$, although this figure remained below the pre-2020 baseline.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio
- Between 2017 and 2019, the EV/EBITDA ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a high of 13.00 and a low of 10.27. Due to negative earnings in 2020, the ratio was not calculable for that period. In 2021, the ratio spiked to 30.05, indicating a significant premium in valuation relative to the recovered earnings capacity.
The data indicates a divergence between market valuation and operational earnings in the latter part of the period. The substantial increase in the EV/EBITDA ratio in 2021 suggests that the enterprise value grew at a much faster rate than the recovery of EBITDA, leading to a highly elevated valuation multiple compared to the 2017-2019 average.
AI Ask an analyst for more