Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Gilead Sciences Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Gilead Sciences Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
Gilead Sciences Inc., economic profit calculation
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2024 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT showed significant fluctuations over the reviewed periods. It increased dramatically from 633 million US dollars in 2020 to 6,897 million in 2021, followed by a sharp decline to 3,687 million in 2022. In 2023, there was a notable recovery to 5,086 million before turning negative at -796 million in 2024. This volatility indicates variability in operating performance and profitability during these years.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited a gradual increasing trend over the period. Starting at 5.19% in 2020, it rose slightly to 5.30% in 2021 and continued to increase to 5.66% in 2022. A marginal decrease to 5.63% was observed in 2023, followed by another increase to 5.85% in 2024. This upward trend suggests a rising expense of financing the company’s operations or increased perceived risk.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital steadily declined from 50,285 million US dollars in 2020 to 44,333 million in 2024. The reduction was consistent across the years, reflecting possible asset disposals, lower reinvestment levels, or optimization efforts in capital deployment.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit experienced pronounced volatility. It was negative at -1,979 million in 2020, then shifted to a strong positive of 4,364 million in 2021. Afterward, it decreased significantly to 1,109 million in 2022 but improved to 2,509 million in 2023 before dropping sharply back into negative territory at -3,389 million in 2024. This pattern suggests fluctuating value creation relative to the company's cost of capital, with periods of strong economic value generation offset by intervals of value erosion.
- Overall Insights
- The financial data reveals a company experiencing variability in profitability and value creation accompanied by a gradually increasing cost of capital and tightening invested capital. The negative economic profit and NOPAT in 2024 are areas of potential concern, highlighting the need for further analysis into the causes of this downturn and assessment of strategic responses to stabilize and improve financial performance moving forward.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Gilead Sciences Inc., NOPAT calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Gilead.
4 2024 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2024 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Gilead.
7 2024 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net income attributable to Gilead
- The net income experienced a significant increase from 123 million US dollars in 2020 to 6,225 million in 2021, marking a substantial positive shift. This was followed by a decrease to 4,592 million in 2022. In 2023, net income showed a recovery, increasing to 5,665 million, but then declined sharply to 480 million in 2024. Overall, the data indicates volatility with a peak in 2021, fluctuations thereafter, and a downward trend by the final year.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a somewhat similar pattern initially, rising from 633 million US dollars in 2020 to a peak of 6,897 million in 2021. However, unlike net income, NOPAT declined more sharply to 3,687 million in 2022. It showed an improvement in 2023, rising to 5,086 million, before turning negative in 2024 with a value of -796 million. This negative figure in the last period signals a significant operational challenge or increased expenses resulting in operating losses after taxes.
Cash Operating Taxes
Gilead Sciences Inc., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense displayed a fluctuating pattern over the examined periods. Starting at 1,580 million US dollars in 2020, the expense increased significantly to 2,077 million US dollars in 2021. This was followed by a sharp decline to 1,248 million US dollars in 2022, remaining relatively stable into 2023 with a negligible decrease to 1,247 million US dollars. Notably, in 2024, there was a pronounced drop to 211 million US dollars, marking the lowest point in the time series.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a generally increasing trend from 2020 to 2022. Beginning at 2,006 million US dollars in 2020, they rose to 2,403 million US dollars in 2021 and further to a peak of 2,981 million US dollars in 2022. The trend reversed afterward, with a decrease to 2,366 million US dollars in 2023, followed by a continued decline to 2,205 million US dollars in 2024. Despite this reversal, cash operating taxes remained higher in the last two years compared to 2020 levels.
- Comparative Insights
- The data suggests a divergence between income tax expense and cash operating taxes beginning from 2022 onwards. While cash operating taxes peaked in 2022 and then declined, income tax expense sharply decreased in 2024, indicating possible changes in tax planning, accounting practices, or tax regulations impacting reporting differently from cash outflows related to operating taxes. The significant reduction in income tax expense by 2024 suggests a substantial alteration in either taxable income or effective tax rates.
Invested Capital
Gilead Sciences Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total Gilead stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
7 Subtraction of marketable debt securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases decreased significantly from 32,117 million US dollars in 2020 to 25,808 million US dollars in 2022. This trend indicates a reduction in debt obligations over this period. However, from 2022 to 2023, the debt level remained relatively stable, showing only a slight decrease to 25,658 million US dollars. In 2024, there was an uptick in total debt, increasing to 27,322 million US dollars, suggesting a reversal of the prior debt reduction trend.
- Total Gilead stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity saw a consistent increase from 18,202 million US dollars in 2020 to a peak of 22,833 million US dollars in 2023. This upward movement reflects a strengthening of the company's equity base during these years. However, in 2024, equity fell notably to 19,330 million US dollars, implying a decrease in net assets attributable to shareholders, which could be due to various factors such as losses, dividends, or share repurchases.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital showed a declining trend throughout the period from 50,285 million US dollars in 2020 to 44,333 million US dollars in 2024. This steady decrease suggests a contraction in the total capital employed in the business, possibly due to asset disposals, changes in financing structure, or operational adjustments.
- Summary
- Overall, the company experienced a reduction in debt from 2020 to 2022, but this trend reversed in 2024. Equity increased notably until 2023, followed by a significant decline in 2024. Invested capital consistently decreased over the five years. These patterns suggest a shifting financial structure, with potential impacts on leverage and capital deployment in the most recent year.
Cost of Capital
Gilead Sciences Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Gilead Sciences Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2024 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The annual financial data reveals several notable trends regarding the company's economic profit, invested capital, and economic spread ratio over the five-year period ending in 2024.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit shows significant fluctuation throughout the years. Initially, it was deeply negative in 2020 at -1,979 million US dollars, then sharply increased to a positive 4,364 million in 2021. Subsequently, it declined to 1,109 million in 2022, increased again to 2,509 million in 2023, and finally turned negative at -3,389 million in 2024. This pattern highlights a period of recovery and growth between 2020 and 2023, followed by a substantial downturn in 2024.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrates a gradual downward trend over the period. Starting at 50,285 million US dollars in 2020, it decreased consistently each year to reach 44,333 million in 2024. This moderate contraction of capital investment suggests the company may be streamlining or divesting certain assets.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, which indicates the difference between return on invested capital and the cost of capital, mirrors the volatility seen in economic profit. It was negative at -3.94% in 2020, turning positive to 9.13% in 2021. Following that peak, it settled at a lower positive value in 2022 and 2023 (2.43% and 5.47%, respectively) before dropping sharply to -7.64% in 2024. This shift to a pronounced negative spread in 2024 reflects deteriorating profitability relative to capital costs, consistent with the negative economic profit in that year.
Overall, the data indicates a cycle of recovery and moderate profitability from 2020 through 2023, accompanied by a contraction in invested capital. However, the sharp decline in 2024, evident in both economic profit and economic spread ratio, may point to challenges impacting the company’s value generation and capital efficiency during that year.
Economic Profit Margin
Gilead Sciences Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Product sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2024 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Product sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial analysis reveals notable fluctuations in the company’s economic profit over the five-year period. Initially, the economic profit was negative at approximately -$1,979 million in 2020, followed by a significant increase to a positive $4,364 million in 2021. This positive trend was not consistently maintained, as economic profit declined to $1,109 million in 2022, then rebounded to $2,509 million in 2023 before sharply returning to a negative figure of -$3,389 million in 2024.
Product sales exhibited a more stable and generally upward trajectory throughout the same period. Starting at about $24,355 million in 2020, sales increased steadily each year with minor fluctuations, reaching approximately $28,610 million by the end of 2024. This indicates consistent revenue growth despite variations in profitability.
The economic profit margin reflects this variability in profitability. It was negative at -8.13% in 2020, turned strongly positive to 16.16% in 2021, and then decreased to 4.11% in 2022. The margin improved again to 9.31% in 2023 but fell to -11.85% in 2024, mirroring the changes seen in economic profit. This suggests that while sales growth was sustained, the company faced challenges in converting revenue into economic profit in certain years.
- Economic Profit
- Presented a volatile pattern with both significant gains and losses during the period, indicating inconsistent profitability.
- Product Sales
- Showed consistent growth with only minor fluctuations, reflecting steady revenue increases.
- Economic Profit Margin
- Varied substantially, paralleling the economic profit trend, and signaling fluctuating efficiency in generating profit relative to sales.
Overall, the company experienced stable revenue growth but struggled with maintaining consistent economic profitability. The contrasting trends between sales and economic profit margin highlight potential areas for operational and cost management improvements to sustain long-term value creation.