EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
AbbVie Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Net Profit Margin since 2012
- Operating Profit Margin since 2012
- Current Ratio since 2012
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2012
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2012
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to AbbVie Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initial years show positive economic profit, followed by a period of negative economic profit, and a return to positive values in the final year presented.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT experienced a decline from US$12,362 million in 2021 to US$11,543 million in 2022. A substantial decrease occurred in 2023, falling to US$3,292 million, before partially recovering to US$4,563 million in 2024 and further increasing to US$5,919 million in 2025. This indicates a period of profitability challenges followed by a recovery.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited a consistent upward trend throughout the period, increasing from 7.64% in 2021 to 8.50% in 2025. This suggests increasing financing costs or perceived risk associated with the company’s operations.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$95,922 million in 2021 to US$82,134 million in 2022, and continued to decline to US$68,204 million in 2023. A slight increase was observed in 2024 to US$69,263 million, followed by a decrease to US$61,356 million in 2025. This suggests a reduction in the company’s capital base over the period.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$5,032 million in 2021 and remained positive at US$4,847 million in 2022. However, it turned negative in 2023, reaching -US$2,392 million, and remained negative in 2024 at -US$1,242 million. A return to positive economic profit was observed in 2025, with a value of US$705 million. The negative economic profit in 2023 and 2024 indicates that the company’s NOPAT was insufficient to cover the cost of its invested capital during those years.
The interplay between declining NOPAT, increasing cost of capital, and fluctuating invested capital significantly impacted economic profit. The recovery in NOPAT in 2024 and 2025, coupled with a stabilization in invested capital, contributed to the return to positive economic profit in the final year.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to AbbVie Inc..
4 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to AbbVie Inc..
7 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
Net earnings attributable to AbbVie Inc. exhibited an initial increase from 2021 to 2022, followed by a substantial decline in 2023 and a slight recovery in 2024 and 2025. However, the trend in net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) presents a different pattern. NOPAT decreased from 2021 to 2023, then increased significantly in 2024 and 2025.
- NOPAT Trend
- NOPAT began at US$12,362 million in 2021, decreasing to US$11,543 million in 2022, representing a decline of approximately 6.7%. A more pronounced decrease occurred in 2023, with NOPAT falling to US$3,292 million. This represents a substantial reduction of over 71% from the 2022 value. A recovery is then observed in 2024, with NOPAT rising to US$4,563 million, and continuing upward in 2025 to reach US$5,919 million. The 2025 value, while representing a significant improvement from 2023, remains below the levels seen in 2021 and 2022.
The divergence between the trends in net earnings and NOPAT suggests potential shifts in the company’s capital structure or non-operating items. While net earnings decreased significantly in 2023, the NOPAT decline was even more substantial, indicating that factors beyond core operating profitability contributed to the reduction in net income. The subsequent recovery in NOPAT, exceeding the recovery in net earnings, suggests improvements in operational efficiency or changes in the cost of capital may be influencing the results.
- Relationship between NOPAT and Net Earnings
- In 2021 and 2022, NOPAT was consistently higher than net earnings attributable to AbbVie Inc. However, this relationship changed in 2023 and 2024, where net earnings exceeded NOPAT. By 2025, net earnings and NOPAT were relatively close, but net earnings remained slightly higher. This difference could be attributed to items such as interest expense, taxes, and other non-operating income or expenses.
The substantial fluctuations in NOPAT warrant further investigation to understand the underlying drivers. A detailed analysis of the components of NOPAT, including operating revenue, operating expenses, and tax rates, would be necessary to pinpoint the specific factors contributing to these changes.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
The reported income tax expense and cash operating taxes exhibit distinct trends over the five-year period. Income tax expense fluctuates considerably, while cash operating taxes generally increase, though with notable variations.
- Income Tax Expense
- Income tax expense increased from US$1,440 million in 2021 to US$1,632 million in 2022, representing a rise of approximately 13.3%. A subsequent decrease was observed in 2023, with expense falling to US$1,377 million. A significant shift occurred in 2024, resulting in a tax benefit of US$570 million. This was followed by a substantial increase in expense to US$2,364 million in 2025. The volatility suggests potential impacts from changes in tax laws, deferred tax asset adjustments, or significant shifts in pre-tax income.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes demonstrate an overall upward trend, although not consistently. The amount rose from US$2,843 million in 2021 to US$3,997 million in 2022, an increase of approximately 40.6%. Further growth was seen in 2023, reaching US$4,625 million. A considerable decline occurred in 2024, with cash taxes decreasing to US$1,339 million. The final year, 2025, shows a recovery to US$3,414 million. The fluctuations in cash taxes are likely influenced by timing differences between income tax expense and actual cash payments, as well as potential tax planning strategies.
- Relationship between Income Tax Expense and Cash Operating Taxes
- A divergence is apparent between the two measures. While income tax expense is reported on the income statement based on accounting standards, cash operating taxes reflect the actual cash outflows for taxes. The significant difference in 2024, where an income tax benefit is recorded alongside a cash outflow, indicates substantial deferred tax impacts or tax credits being utilized. The generally higher level of cash taxes compared to income tax expense throughout the period suggests the company may be utilizing tax loss carryforwards or experiencing temporary differences that result in higher cash payments than reported expense.
The observed patterns warrant further investigation into the underlying drivers of these fluctuations, particularly the significant changes in 2024 and 2025, to fully understand their implications for the company’s financial position and future cash flows.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of restructuring reserve.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity (deficit).
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
7 Subtraction of available-for-sale investment securities.
The reported invested capital demonstrates a declining trend over the five-year period. Total reported debt & leases and stockholders’ equity both contribute to the calculation of invested capital, and changes in these components influence the overall trend.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital decreased from US$95,922 million in 2021 to US$61,356 million in 2025. The most significant decrease occurred between 2022 and 2023, falling from US$82,134 million to US$68,204 million. A smaller decrease was observed between 2021 and 2022. A slight increase occurred between 2023 and 2024, followed by a further decrease in 2025.
- Debt & Leases
- Total reported debt & leases decreased from US$77,575 million in 2021 to US$64,191 million in 2022, continuing to US$60,286 million in 2023. An increase to US$68,019 million was noted in 2024, followed by a marginal increase to US$68,379 million in 2025. While fluctuating, the level of debt remained relatively stable between 2024 and 2025.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity increased from US$15,408 million in 2021 to US$17,254 million in 2022. However, a substantial decline was observed in subsequent years, decreasing to US$10,360 million in 2023, US$3,325 million in 2024, and ultimately reaching a deficit of US$-3,270 million in 2025. This negative equity position in the final year represents a significant shift.
The decrease in invested capital appears to be primarily driven by the substantial reduction in stockholders’ equity, particularly in the later years of the period. While debt levels decreased initially, they stabilized and even increased slightly in the most recent years, suggesting that debt reduction is not the primary driver of the overall decline in invested capital. The transition to negative stockholders’ equity in 2025 is a notable development that warrants further investigation.
Cost of Capital
AbbVie Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation over the five-year period. Initially positive, the ratio declined significantly, becoming negative before recovering in the final year. This movement correlates with changes in economic profit and invested capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- The economic spread ratio began at 5.25% in 2021, increasing to a peak of 5.90% in 2022. A substantial decrease followed, with the ratio falling to -3.51% in 2023 and further to -1.79% in 2024. A positive value of 1.15% was recorded in 2025, indicating a return to positive value creation relative to invested capital.
The economic spread ratio’s negative values in 2023 and 2024 suggest that the company’s returns on invested capital were below its cost of capital during those years. The recovery in 2025 indicates an improvement in this relationship.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The economic spread ratio’s trajectory mirrors the trend in economic profit. Positive economic profit values in 2021 and 2022 coincided with positive economic spread ratios. The shift to negative economic profit in 2023 and 2024 directly resulted in negative economic spread ratios. The return to positive economic profit in 2025 corresponded with a positive economic spread ratio.
- Relationship to Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased consistently from 2021 to 2025. While decreasing invested capital can improve ratios, the substantial decline in economic profit overwhelmed this effect in 2023 and 2024, leading to significantly negative economic spread ratios. The 2025 recovery suggests that improvements in profitability were sufficient to offset the continued reduction in invested capital.
The observed volatility in the economic spread ratio warrants further investigation into the underlying drivers of economic profit and invested capital. Understanding the factors contributing to the fluctuations is crucial for assessing the company’s long-term value creation potential.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the five-year period. Initial positive values transitioned to negative figures before a return to positive territory. This analysis details the observed trends and potential implications.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2021 and 2022, the economic profit margin stood at 8.95% and 8.35% respectively, indicating a consistent level of economic value creation relative to net revenues. A significant shift occurred in 2023, with the margin declining to -4.40%, signifying economic losses. This negative trend continued into 2024, albeit at a lessened rate, with a margin of -2.21%. By 2025, the economic profit margin had recovered to 1.15%, suggesting a return to economic profitability, though at a lower level than initially observed.
- Relationship to Net Revenues
- Net revenues generally increased over the period, rising from US$56,197 million in 2021 to US$61,160 million in 2025. However, the increase in net revenues did not consistently translate into increased economic profit. The decline in economic profit margin in 2023 and 2024, despite rising revenues, suggests that the cost of capital, or other factors impacting economic profit calculation, increased at a faster rate than revenue growth.
- Economic Profit Fluctuations
- The absolute value of economic profit mirrored the trend in the economic profit margin. Positive economic profit of US$5,032 million and US$4,847 million in 2021 and 2022 respectively, were followed by economic losses of US$2,392 million and US$1,242 million in 2023 and 2024. The return to a positive economic profit of US$705 million in 2025 aligns with the improved, though modest, economic profit margin.
The observed volatility in the economic profit margin warrants further investigation into the underlying drivers of economic profit. Factors such as changes in the cost of capital, operational efficiency, and investment decisions likely contributed to these fluctuations.