EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Tesla Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2010
- Net Profit Margin since 2010
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Tesla Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance, as measured by economic profit, exhibits a fluctuating pattern over the five-year period. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) initially increased significantly before declining, while invested capital consistently rose. The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period. These factors combined to produce a volatile economic profit trajectory.
- NOPAT Trend
- Net operating profit after taxes demonstrated substantial growth from 2021 to 2022, increasing from US$7,214 million to US$14,874 million. However, this was followed by a decline in subsequent years, reaching US$5,629 million by 2025. This suggests a potential weakening in operational profitability despite increasing investment.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained consistently high, fluctuating between 27.65% and 27.80% over the observed period. This indicates a sustained level of risk or required return for investors, impacting the company’s ability to generate positive economic profit.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital experienced a continuous upward trend, increasing from US$40,247 million in 2021 to US$69,754 million in 2025. This indicates ongoing investment in the business, potentially to support growth initiatives or expansion, but not necessarily translating into improved economic returns.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit began at a negative value of -US$3,956 million in 2021. It turned positive in 2022, reaching US$1,095 million, coinciding with the peak in NOPAT. However, economic profit subsequently became negative again and deteriorated significantly through 2025, reaching -US$13,760 million. This indicates that the returns generated from invested capital were insufficient to cover the cost of that capital, particularly in the later years of the period.
The increasing invested capital coupled with declining NOPAT and a stable cost of capital resulted in a substantial decrease in economic profit. This suggests a growing disparity between capital employed and the returns generated, potentially signaling a need to reassess investment strategies or improve operational efficiency.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued warranty reserve.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to common stockholders.
5 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to common stockholders.
8 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
Net income attributable to common stockholders and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) both demonstrate significant fluctuations over the five-year period. NOPAT exhibits a more pronounced growth trajectory initially, followed by a decline, while net income mirrors this pattern but with differing magnitudes.
- NOPAT Trend
- NOPAT increased substantially from $7,214 million in 2021 to $14,874 million in 2022, representing a growth of over 106%. This growth slowed in 2023, with NOPAT reaching $11,309 million, a decrease of approximately 24% from the prior year. The decline continued into 2024, with NOPAT at $8,828 million, and further decreased to $5,629 million in 2025. This represents a cumulative decrease of approximately 62% from the peak in 2022.
- Net Income Trend
- Net income attributable to common stockholders also increased significantly from $5,519 million in 2021 to $12,556 million in 2022, a growth of approximately 128%. It continued to rise in 2023, reaching $14,997 million. However, a substantial decrease is observed in 2024, with net income falling to $7,091 million. This downward trend persisted in 2025, with net income reported at $3,794 million, representing a decrease of approximately 75% from its peak in 2023.
- Relationship between NOPAT and Net Income
- While both metrics generally move in the same direction, the magnitude of change differs. The increase in net income from 2021 to 2023 was more substantial than the increase in NOPAT over the same period. Conversely, the decline in net income from 2023 to 2025 was more pronounced than the decline in NOPAT. This suggests that factors beyond core operating profitability, such as financing costs or non-operating items, are influencing net income to a greater extent than NOPAT.
The observed declines in both NOPAT and net income in the later years of the period warrant further investigation to determine the underlying causes. Potential factors could include increased competition, rising input costs, changes in pricing strategy, or macroeconomic conditions.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes exhibits significant volatility over the observed period. Beginning at US$699 million in 2021, it increased to US$1,132 million in 2022 before experiencing a substantial negative swing to a benefit of negative US$5,001 million in 2023. This was followed by a return to a provision of US$1,837 million in 2024 and a slight decrease to US$1,423 million in 2025.
Cash operating taxes demonstrate a more stable, though declining, trend. An initial value of US$936 million in 2021 rose to US$1,335 million in 2022. Subsequent years show a gradual decrease, with values of US$1,208 million, US$1,164 million, and US$1,085 million reported for 2023, 2024, and 2025 respectively.
- Provision for Income Taxes Trend
- The large negative provision in 2023 suggests a significant impact from tax credits, changes in deferred tax assets/liabilities, or alterations in tax laws. Further investigation would be required to determine the specific drivers behind this substantial shift. The return to a positive provision in 2024 and 2025 indicates a normalization of the tax expense, though it remains below the levels seen in 2021 and 2022.
- Cash Taxes vs. Provision for Taxes
- A consistent difference exists between the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes throughout the period. This discrepancy suggests the presence of non-cash tax items, such as deferred taxes, impacting the reported provision. The magnitude of this difference is particularly pronounced in 2023, correlating with the negative provision for income taxes.
- Cash Operating Taxes Trend
- The observed decline in cash operating taxes from 2022 to 2025, while gradual, warrants attention. This could be attributable to changes in tax rates, increased tax deductions, or shifts in the geographic distribution of taxable income. The consistent decrease suggests a potentially evolving tax strategy or external factors influencing the company’s tax obligations.
The divergence between the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes highlights the importance of analyzing both figures when assessing a company’s tax position and its impact on economic value added. The volatility in the provision for income taxes necessitates a deeper understanding of the underlying accounting and tax-related events driving these fluctuations.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of deferred revenue.
4 Addition of accrued warranty reserve.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of short-term investments.
The invested capital of the company demonstrates a consistent upward trend over the five-year period. Simultaneously, changes are observed in the composition of that capital, specifically regarding debt and equity financing.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital increased from US$40,247 million in 2021 to US$69,754 million in 2025. This represents a cumulative growth of 73.1% over the period. The rate of increase slowed between 2024 and 2025, with an increase of only 3.3% compared to a 12.1% increase between 2023 and 2024.
- Debt & Leases
- Total reported debt and leases decreased significantly from US$8,873 million in 2021 to US$5,748 million in 2022, a reduction of 35.3%. However, debt levels then began to rise, reaching US$14,719 million by 2025. This represents a 156.6% increase from the 2022 low. The most substantial increase in debt occurred between 2023 and 2024, growing by 42.3%.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity exhibited consistent growth throughout the period, increasing from US$30,189 million in 2021 to US$82,137 million in 2025. This represents a 172.1% increase. The rate of growth in equity slowed slightly from 2024 to 2025, but remained positive.
- Capital Structure Shift
- In 2021, debt constituted approximately 22.1% of invested capital (US$8,873 / US$40,247). By 2025, this proportion had risen to approximately 21.1% (US$14,719 / US$69,754). While the percentage change is relatively small, the increasing absolute value of debt suggests a growing reliance on debt financing, particularly in the later years of the observed period. Equity consistently represented the majority of invested capital, increasing its share slightly over the period.
The company’s increasing invested capital, coupled with the recent rise in debt, warrants further investigation into the efficiency of capital allocation and the associated financial risks.
Cost of Capital
Tesla Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Ford Motor Co. | ||||||
| General Motors Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibits a concerning downward trend over the five-year period. Initially negative in 2021, the ratio improved to a positive value in 2022 before declining significantly through 2025. This pattern is closely linked to fluctuations in economic profit and invested capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio began at -9.83% in 2021, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its weighted average cost of capital. A substantial improvement was observed in 2022, with the ratio reaching 2.21%, suggesting the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital. However, this positive performance was short-lived. The ratio decreased to -8.63% in 2023 and continued to deteriorate, reaching -14.70% in 2024 and -19.73% in 2025. This consistent decline suggests a growing disparity between the company’s returns and its cost of capital.
The economic spread ratio’s movement mirrors the changes in economic profit. While economic profit turned positive in 2022, coinciding with the peak in the economic spread ratio, the subsequent return to negative economic profit in 2023 and its further decline in 2024 and 2025 directly correlate with the worsening economic spread ratio.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, rising from US$40,247 million in 2021 to US$69,754 million in 2025. This growth in invested capital, coupled with the declining economic profit, likely contributed to the negative trend in the economic spread ratio. The company is deploying more capital, but generating increasingly lower returns relative to that investment.
The combination of rising invested capital and decreasing economic profit indicates a potential issue with capital allocation efficiency. The company’s ability to generate returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital is diminishing, despite increasing investment. Continued monitoring of these trends is warranted to assess the long-term sustainability of the company’s financial performance.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Ford Motor Co. | ||||||
| General Motors Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations over the five-year period. Initially negative, it became positive in 2022 before reverting to negative values and declining consistently through 2025. This pattern mirrors the trend observed in economic profit, which decreased from a positive value in 2022 to increasingly negative values in subsequent years.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2021, the economic profit margin stood at -7.25%. A substantial improvement was noted in 2022, with the margin reaching 1.33%, indicating positive economic profit generation relative to adjusted revenues. However, this positive trend was short-lived. The margin decreased to -5.22% in 2023 and continued to deteriorate, reaching -10.13% in 2024 and -14.42% in 2025. This represents a consistent erosion of economic profitability as a percentage of revenue.
The adjusted revenues demonstrate an initial increase from 2021 to 2023, peaking at US$98,337 million. However, revenues experienced a slight decrease in 2024 and a further decline in 2025, settling at US$95,397 million. Despite the initial revenue growth, the increasing negative economic profit margin suggests that the cost of capital, or other adjustments made to arrive at economic profit, grew at a faster rate than revenue generation, or that revenue growth was insufficient to offset increasing costs.
- Relationship between Economic Profit and Margin
- The economic profit margin directly reflects the economic profit. The shift from negative to positive economic profit in 2022 corresponds to the positive margin observed in that year. The subsequent decline in economic profit is mirrored by the decreasing and increasingly negative economic profit margin. This indicates a strong correlation between overall economic profit and its expression as a percentage of adjusted revenues.
The consistent decline in the economic profit margin from 2022 to 2025 warrants further investigation. While adjusted revenues remained relatively stable after 2023, the continued deterioration of the margin suggests underlying issues related to cost management, capital efficiency, or the accuracy of adjustments made to calculate economic profit. The increasing magnitude of the negative margin in later years indicates a growing disparity between returns generated and the cost of capital employed.