Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).
The financial performance between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by a period of initial volatility followed by a phase of relative stabilization. A significant contraction in profitability occurred across all measured metrics in 2015, which was followed by a substantial recovery in 2016 and a subsequent plateau in operational earnings through 2019.
- EBITDA Performance Trends
- EBITDA reached a peak of 3,648,500 thousand US$ in May 2014, followed by a sharp decline of approximately 24% to 2,763,100 thousand US$ in May 2015. A strong rebound occurred in 2016, with the figure rising to 3,412,000 thousand US$. For the remainder of the period, EBITDA remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a tight range between 3,224,500 thousand US$ in 2018 and 3,301,500 thousand US$ in 2019.
- Analysis of Non-Cash Charges
- The variance between EBITDA and EBIT reveals a consistent level of depreciation and amortization expenses. This gap remained steady throughout the observed timeframe, starting at 585,400 thousand US$ in 2014 and ending at 620,100 thousand US$ in 2019. The stability of this difference indicates a consistent asset amortization schedule and a lack of massive capital expenditure shifts during this window.
- Operational to Net Earnings Conversion
- Net earnings demonstrated significantly higher volatility than EBITDA. While EBITDA showed a plateau from 2017 to 2019, net earnings fluctuated more aggressively, reaching a period high of 2,131,000 thousand US$ in 2018 before dropping to 1,752,700 thousand US$ in 2019. This indicates that non-operating factors, such as interest payments and tax obligations, exerted a more variable influence on the final bottom line than core operational performance did.
- Earnings Before Tax (EBT) and EBIT Correlation
- A consistent correlation is observed between EBIT and EBT, with the difference representing interest expenses. Between 2014 and 2019, the gap between EBIT and EBT generally narrowed or remained stable, though the overall downward trend from the 2014 peak in EBIT (3,063,100 thousand US$) to the 2019 level (2,681,400 thousand US$) mirrors the broader trajectory of operational profitability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 46,517,358) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 3,301,500) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.09 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Coca-Cola Co. | 21.60 |
| Mondelēz International Inc. | 18.02 |
| PepsiCo Inc. | 13.60 |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | 18.79 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| May 26, 2019 | May 27, 2018 | May 28, 2017 | May 29, 2016 | May 31, 2015 | May 25, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 45,968,119) | 42,033,361) | 40,796,369) | 50,623,631) | 43,168,268) | 40,882,674) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 3,301,500) | 3,224,500) | 3,262,000) | 3,412,000) | 2,763,100) | 3,648,500) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 13.92 | 13.04 | 12.51 | 14.84 | 15.62 | 11.21 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Mondelēz International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| PepsiCo Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).
3 2019 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 45,968,119 ÷ 3,301,500 = 13.92
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The valuation profile between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by initial volatility in the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, followed by a period of relative stabilization. The ratio moved from a low of 11.21 in 2014 to a peak of 15.62 in 2015, before settling within a range of 12.51 to 13.92 for the remainder of the observed period.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- Enterprise Value exhibited significant fluctuation, reaching a peak of US$ 50.62 billion in 2016. A substantial correction occurred in 2017, with the value declining to US$ 40.80 billion. Following this correction, a gradual recovery trend is observed, with the value rising to US$ 45.97 billion by May 2019.
- EBITDA Performance
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization showed a notable decline in 2015, falling to US$ 2.76 billion from a 2014 high of US$ 3.65 billion. From 2016 through 2019, EBITDA demonstrated relative stability, maintaining a narrow range between US$ 3.22 billion and US$ 3.41 billion.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Interpretation
- The sharp expansion of the EV/EBITDA ratio to 15.62 in 2015 was primarily driven by the contraction in EBITDA rather than a proportional increase in Enterprise Value. The subsequent moderation of the ratio suggests a realignment of market valuation with operational cash flow. The gradual increase in the ratio from 12.51 in 2017 to 13.92 in 2019 indicates a rising valuation multiple despite relatively flat EBITDA growth.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?