Stock Analysis on Net

General Mills Inc. (NYSE:GIS)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 18, 2019.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.


Economic Profit

General Mills Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The net operating profit after taxes shows some variability but generally exhibits an increasing trend over the period analyzed. It started at approximately 2.22 billion US dollars in 2014, declined notably in 2015 to around 1.62 billion, then recovered and increased steadily to reach about 2.27 billion by 2019. This indicates improved profitability after a temporary downturn in 2015.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital declined overall during the period, starting at approximately 10.43% in 2014 and decreasing to around 9.48% in 2019. The rate experienced fluctuations, with a peak near 10.93% in 2016 and a low of 8.85% in 2018. The downward trend in the cost of capital suggests potentially lower financing costs or reduced risk perceptions over time.
Invested Capital
Invested capital remained relatively stable from 2014 to 2017, fluctuating slightly between approximately 18.4 billion and 19.4 billion US dollars. However, a significant increase occurred in 2018, spiking to about 27.6 billion, and remained at a similar level (~27.4 billion) in 2019. This sharp increase indicates substantial capital deployment or acquisition activities during 2018, maintaining the higher asset base afterward.
Economic Profit
Economic profit demonstrated considerable volatility throughout the period. It began positively in 2014 with approximately 199 million US dollars but dropped sharply to a negative value of about -382 million in 2015. In 2016 and 2017, economic profit returned to positive territory, though at a reduced level compared to 2014. However, in 2018 and 2019, economic profit again fell deeply negative, reaching approximately -524 million and -322 million, respectively. These negative figures during latter years, despite increased NOPAT, suggest that the returns on invested capital did not surpass the cost of capital, likely reflecting the impact of the increased invested capital base.
Overall Analysis
The data reveal an increase in profitability after an initial dip, coupled with a general reduction in the cost of capital. However, the sharp increase in invested capital since 2018 has not translated into corresponding economic profit improvements. Instead, economic profit turned significantly negative, indicating that the company may be facing challenges in generating returns above its cost of capital on the expanded capital base. This pattern underscores the importance of assessing capital deployment efficiency and the nature of recent investments or acquisitions.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

General Mills Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Net earnings attributable to General Mills
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve3
Increase (decrease) in reserve for restructuring and other exit charges4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Tax benefit of interest expense, net of capitalized interest7
Adjusted interest expense, net of capitalized interest, after taxes8
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income9
Investment income, after taxes10
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in reserve for restructuring and other exit charges.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to General Mills.

6 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net of capitalized interest = Adjusted interest expense, net of capitalized interest × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to General Mills.

9 2019 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data shows the annual performance of the company over a six-year period from 2014 to 2019. Two key metrics are presented: net earnings attributable to the company and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT).

Net Earnings Attributable to the Company
The net earnings exhibit fluctuations throughout the period. Starting from $1,824,400 thousand in 2014, there is a notable decline to $1,221,300 thousand in 2015. This is followed by a recovery phase where net earnings increase to $1,697,400 thousand in 2016 but then slightly dip to $1,657,500 thousand in 2017. The peak is observed in 2018 at $2,131,000 thousand, representing the highest net earnings in this timeframe. However, the following year, 2019, shows a decline to $1,752,700 thousand, reflecting a decrease of approximately 17.8% from the previous year’s peak.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT also shows variability but with a generally increasing trend. It begins at $2,219,325 thousand in 2014 and declines in 2015 to $1,616,844 thousand, mirroring the net earnings pattern. Thereafter, NOPAT steadily recovers and increases, reaching $2,029,941 thousand in 2016 and continuing its ascent with minor fluctuation to $2,079,159 thousand in 2017 and $1,920,512 thousand in 2018. The highest value is recorded in 2019 at $2,274,308 thousand, representing a strong recovery and the highest operational efficiency in terms of post-tax profits over the period.

Overall, both net earnings and NOPAT show an initial decline from 2014 to 2015, likely indicating a challenging year or adverse conditions. Despite this, the company demonstrates resilience with a recovery phase from 2016 onward. Net earnings reach their peak in 2018 but experience a downturn in 2019. Conversely, NOPAT recovers more robustly, peaking in 2019 and displaying stronger operational profitability relative to net earnings. This divergence in the final year may suggest changes in non-operating items, tax impacts, or other factors affecting net earnings differently than operating profit.


Cash Operating Taxes

General Mills Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).


The financial data reveals a fluctuating trend in the income taxes and cash operating taxes over the six-year period.

Income Taxes

Income taxes decreased significantly from 883,300 thousand US dollars in May 2014 to 586,800 thousand US dollars in May 2015, representing a notable reduction.

Subsequently, there was an increase to 755,200 thousand US dollars in May 2016, followed by a decline to 655,200 thousand US dollars in May 2017.

In May 2018, income taxes declined sharply to 57,300 thousand US dollars, marking the lowest point in the period analyzed, before rising to 367,800 thousand US dollars in May 2019.

Cash Operating Taxes

Cash operating taxes exhibited a more stable but variable trend, starting at 821,360 thousand US dollars in May 2014 and decreasing to 676,323 thousand US dollars in May 2015.

There was a slight increase to 745,707 thousand US dollars in May 2016, followed by a decrease to 579,670 thousand US dollars in May 2017.

The value rose again to 674,791 thousand US dollars in May 2018 before declining sharply to 383,900 thousand US dollars in May 2019.

Overall, both income taxes and cash operating taxes show substantial volatility over the years. Income taxes show a steep decline around 2018, while cash operating taxes, although variable, remain generally higher than income taxes except for 2018. The trends suggest potential changes in tax obligations or tax planning strategies impacting these financial items during the examined period.


Invested Capital

General Mills Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Current portion of long-term debt
Notes payable
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost4
Reserve for restructuring and other exit charges5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Redeemable interest
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress8
Marketable securities9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »

5 Addition of reserve for restructuring and other exit charges.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.

9 Subtraction of marketable securities.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases showed a fluctuating trend over the six-year period. Initially, there was a moderate increase from approximately $9.13 billion in 2014 to $9.58 billion in 2015, followed by a decline to about $8.79 billion in 2016. In 2017, the debt level rose again to roughly $9.93 billion. A significant increase occurred in 2018, reaching approximately $16.32 billion, the highest level in the period analyzed. This peak was followed by a slight reduction to $14.93 billion in 2019, indicating a partial deleveraging but maintaining a relatively high debt position compared to earlier years.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity experienced a downward trajectory between 2014 and 2017, decreasing from approximately $6.53 billion to around $4.33 billion. This decline suggests a reduction in the net value attributable to shareholders during this period. However, equity started to recover in 2018, increasing notably to $6.14 billion, and continued to grow in 2019, reaching about $7.05 billion. The recovery indicates a strengthening of the company’s equity base in the latter years analyzed.
Invested Capital
Invested capital exhibited relative stability from 2014 to 2017, ranging between approximately $18.4 billion and $19.4 billion. In 2018 there was a marked increase to roughly $27.61 billion, which was sustained in 2019 with a slight decrease to $27.38 billion. This sharp increase in invested capital parallels the rise in total reported debt and leases during the same period, suggesting significant capital allocation or asset acquisition financed largely through debt.
Overall Analysis
The financial data indicates that the company increased its leverage significantly in 2018 and maintained a higher debt load in 2019 relative to the earlier years. This period also coincides with a substantial jump in invested capital, signaling possibly intensified investment activity or expansion. Meanwhile, stockholders’ equity contracted from 2014 through 2017 but recovered afterward, possibly reflecting improved profitability or capital injections. The trends suggest a strategic phase of investment funded by increased debt, with signs of balance sheet strengthening towards the end of the period.

Cost of Capital

General Mills Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 29.40%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 29.40%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

General Mills Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Economic Profit
The economic profit exhibited significant fluctuations over the six-year period. Initially, a positive value of approximately $199 million was recorded, followed by a substantial decline into negative territory around -$382 million in 2015. A recovery occurred in 2016 and 2017, with economic profit reaching positive values of about $17 million and $150 million, respectively. However, the subsequent years saw a sharp reversal, with economic profit falling to -$524 million in 2018 and remaining negative at approximately -$322 million in 2019. This volatility indicates instability in the company’s ability to generate returns above its cost of capital during this timeframe.
Invested Capital
The invested capital showed a relatively stable trend from 2014 through 2017, fluctuating slightly around the $18 billion to $19 billion mark. A notable increase occurred in 2018, where invested capital jumped significantly to over $27.6 billion, maintaining a similar level into 2019 with approximately $27.4 billion. This marked increase suggests either significant capital investment or acquisition activity within these years, reflecting a possible strategic expansion or restructuring of the company’s asset base.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio, representing the difference between return on invested capital and cost of capital as a percentage, mirrored the pattern observed in economic profit. It started positively at 1.03% in 2014, declined sharply to -1.98% in 2015, and showed marginal positive improvement to 0.09% and 0.79% in the following two years. The metric then decreased again to negative values of -1.9% in 2018 and -1.18% in 2019. This trend highlights the company's challenges in sustaining returns above its capital costs, reinforcing the insights gained from the economic profit analysis.

Economic Profit Margin

General Mills Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Net Sales
The net sales figures indicate a downward trend from 2014 to 2017, decreasing from 17,909,600 thousand US dollars to 15,619,800 thousand US dollars. However, in 2018 and 2019, a slight recovery is observed, with net sales increasing to 15,740,400 thousand and then to 16,865,200 thousand US dollars, respectively. Overall, net sales show a decline over the six-year period, with some stabilization and modest growth towards the end.
Economic Profit
The economic profit exhibits significant volatility throughout the period. It starts at a positive 198,911 thousand US dollars in 2014, followed by a sharp decline to a negative 381,833 thousand US dollars in 2015. The figure recovers somewhat in 2016 and 2017, reaching positive levels of 17,450 thousand and 149,981 thousand US dollars. However, 2018 and 2019 again show negative economic profits of -524,064 thousand and -322,225 thousand US dollars. This pattern suggests fluctuations in profitability, with challenges evident particularly in 2015 and the last two years analyzed.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin mirrors the trends seen in economic profit, showing a positive margin of 1.11% in 2014, followed by a significant drop to -2.17% in 2015. Margins improve slightly in 2016 (0.11%) and 2017 (0.96%) but deteriorate again in 2018 and 2019 to -3.33% and -1.91%. This volatility reflects changes in the company's ability to generate returns above its cost of capital, with periods of both margin expansion and contraction.