Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by a period of initial expansion, a severe operational contraction, and a subsequent gradual recovery in cash-basis operating profitability. The trajectory of earnings indicates a significant disruption occurring in 2020, followed by a volatile path toward stabilization.
- EBITDA Trend Analysis
- A growth phase is observed from 2018 to 2019, with EBITDA increasing from US$ 4,883 million to a peak of US$ 5,492 million. This was followed by a sharp decline in 2020, where EBITDA fell to a negative US$ 485 million. A modest recovery began in 2021 and continued into 2022, with EBITDA reaching US$ 188 million and US$ 351 million, respectively. Despite this return to positive territory, the 2022 EBITDA remains significantly below the pre-2020 baseline.
- Operating Profitability and Depreciation
- The divergence between EBITDA and EBIT highlights the impact of depreciation and amortization. In 2022, while EBITDA was positive at US$ 351 million, EBIT remained negative at US$ 685 million. This indicates that non-cash charges continued to exceed the operating cash flow generated by the business, preventing a full return to operating profitability on an EBIT basis.
- Net Income and Non-Operating Volatility
- Extreme volatility is evident in the bottom-line results. Net income plummeted from US$ 2,698 million in 2019 to a loss of US$ 1,685 million in 2020. A notable anomaly is observed in 2022, where Net Income returned to a substantial positive of US$ 1,832 million despite Earnings Before Tax (EBT) remaining negative at US$ 1,387 million. This suggests that the 2022 net profit was driven by significant non-operating items, tax credits, or one-time gains rather than core operational performance.
- Earnings Erosion Pattern
- The progression from EBITDA to Net Income reveals a consistent erosion of value through interest and taxes during the peak years. Conversely, during the 2020-2022 recovery period, the recovery of EBITDA preceded the recovery of EBIT and EBT, illustrating a lagging return to structural profitability despite the improvement in raw operating cash flow.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 44,089) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 351) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 125.61 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Airbnb Inc. | 26.39 |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 13.75 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 16.28 |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 47.88 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 14.23 |
| Starbucks Corp. | 25.05 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Consumer Services | 26.62 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 35.03 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 53,831) | 46,945) | 54,882) | 60,584) | 56,136) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 351) | 188) | (485) | 5,492) | 4,883) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 153.36 | 249.71 | — | 11.03 | 11.50 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 36.61 | 338.63 | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 19.20 | 45.39 | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 29.62 | 40.00 | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 20.87 | 17.49 | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | 19.88 | 18.77 | 38.99 | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Consumer Services | 23.77 | 27.18 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 20.01 | 21.51 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 53,831 ÷ 351 = 153.36
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by a severe dislocation between the company's enterprise value and its operational earnings. While the enterprise value remained relatively resilient, the earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) experienced a precipitous decline starting in 2020, leading to an extreme inflation of the valuation multiple.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise value peaked in 2019 at 60,584 million US$ before entering a period of volatility. A significant contraction occurred by 2021, where the value reached a period low of 46,945 million US$. A subsequent recovery was observed in 2022, with the value increasing to 53,831 million US$. Despite these fluctuations, the EV did not decline proportionally to the collapse in earnings.
- EBITDA Contraction and Partial Recovery
- Operational profitability shifted from a position of strength to severe distress. In 2018 and 2019, EBITDA was substantial, peaking at 5,492 million US$. This was followed by a total collapse in 2020, where earnings turned negative to -485 million US$. Although EBITDA returned to positive territory in 2021 (188 million US$) and 2022 (351 million US$), these levels remained negligible compared to the pre-2020 baseline.
- EV/EBITDA Multiple Dynamics
- The valuation multiple transitioned from a stable range of 11.03 to 11.50 in 2018 and 2019 to extreme levels following the earnings collapse. The ratio became mathematically undefined in 2020 due to negative EBITDA. In 2021, the ratio spiked to 249.71, and while it moderated to 153.36 in 2022, the figure remained exceptionally high. This suggests that the enterprise value was supported by factors other than current operational cash flow, as the multiple expanded far beyond historical norms.
AI Ask an analyst for more