Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
Paying user area
Try for free
Mosaic Co. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Mosaic Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Mosaic Co., EBITDA calculation
US$ in thousands
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
- Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Mosaic
- The net earnings exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period. Initially, there was a notable loss of approximately $107.2 million in 2017, followed by a sharp recovery to a profit of $470 million in 2018. The year 2019 experienced a substantial downturn, with net losses surging to about $1.067 billion. Subsequently, the company reversed this trend with profits of $666.1 million in 2020 and further improved to $1.63 billion in 2021, marking a strong recovery and growth phase.
- Earnings Before Tax (EBT)
- The earnings before tax followed a similar volatile pattern. It increased from $390.7 million in 2017 to $547 million in 2018, then plunged to a negative value of $1.3155 billion in 2019. This was followed by a modest recovery to $87.1 million in 2020 and a pronounced jump to $2.2326 billion in 2021. The fluctuation indicates sensitivity to external or internal factors affecting pre-tax profitability, with a powerful rebound in the last reported year.
- Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
- The EBIT also demonstrated substantial variability across the years. Starting at $562 million in 2017, it grew to $762.8 million in 2018 before falling sharply into negative territory at $1.0995 billion in 2019. The company returned to profitability in 2020 with $301.2 million and recorded significant growth reaching approximately $2.427 billion in 2021. The trend reflects considerable operational challenges in 2019, followed by operational recovery and expansion.
- Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
- The EBITDA figures mirrored those of EBIT but highlighted a more pronounced decline and recovery pattern. From $1.2275 billion in 2017, EBITDA increased to $1.647 billion in 2018 but dramatically dropped to $216.8 million (a sharp decline) in 2019. Afterwards, it rebounded strongly to $1.1488 billion in 2020 and surged to $3.2398 billion in 2021, indicating improved operational cash flow generation capabilities and potentially enhanced cost management or revenue growth during the recovery period.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
Mosaic Co., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Linde plc | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Chemicals | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Materials | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
Mosaic Co., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | ||||||
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
-
The enterprise value exhibited a mixed trend over the five-year period. It started at approximately 14.06 billion USD in 2017, increasing to around 15.54 billion USD in 2018. In 2019, there was a notable decline to roughly 12.01 billion USD. This was followed by a significant rise in 2020 to about 16.08 billion USD and continued growth in 2021, reaching approximately 21.05 billion USD. This pattern suggests periods of volatility with a general upward trajectory in recent years.
- Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
-
EBITDA showed substantial fluctuations within the period. Beginning at 1.23 billion USD in 2017, it rose notably to 1.65 billion USD in 2018. In contrast, 2019 featured a considerable downturn, resulting in a negative EBITDA of 217 million USD, indicating operational challenges or extraordinary expenses during that year. The metric rebounded in 2020 to about 1.15 billion USD and surged to its highest level of 3.24 billion USD in 2021. This increase in 2021 signifies a robust recovery and improved operational performance.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio
-
The EV/EBITDA ratio experienced considerable variability throughout the years analyzed. Starting at 11.45 in 2017, it declined to 9.44 in 2018, reflecting a relatively more favorable valuation compared to EBITDA. The ratio was not available for 2019 due to a negative EBITDA, which renders the ratio calculation infeasible. In 2020, the ratio rose sharply to 13.99, indicating a higher enterprise value relative to EBITDA, possibly due to EBITDA recovering from negative territory or market valuation dynamics. By 2021, the ratio decreased significantly to 6.5, suggesting a more attractive valuation relative to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, coinciding with the EBITDA reaching its peak.