Stock Analysis on Net

Twitter Inc. (NYSE:TWTR)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 26, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Twitter Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited substantial volatility, moving from a loss in 2017 to a peak in 2018, followed by declines in subsequent years, culminating in a substantial loss in 2021. Invested capital generally increased throughout the period, with the most significant rise occurring between 2020 and 2021. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease observed in 2021.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the analyzed timeframe. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased over the years, indicating a widening gap between returns generated and the cost of capital. The largest negative economic profit was recorded in 2021, suggesting a significant underperformance relative to the capital employed.
NOPAT and Economic Profit Relationship
The fluctuations in NOPAT directly correlate with the changes in economic profit. The positive NOPAT in 2018 resulted in the least negative economic profit for the period, although still negative. Conversely, the substantial losses in NOPAT in 2017 and 2021 led to the largest negative economic profit figures. This indicates that the ability to generate operating profit is a primary driver of economic profit.
Invested Capital and Economic Profit
While invested capital increased over the period, the economic profit deteriorated. This suggests that increases in capital employed did not translate into commensurate increases in returns. The growing invested capital base, coupled with inconsistent NOPAT, contributed to the widening negative economic profit.
Cost of Capital Impact
The cost of capital remained relatively consistent, with a slight decrease in 2021. The decrease in the cost of capital in 2021 did not offset the substantial decline in NOPAT, and the negative economic profit continued to worsen. This suggests that the cost of capital, while a factor, was not the primary driver of the observed economic underperformance.

In summary, the analysis reveals a consistent inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital. The increasing invested capital, combined with volatile NOPAT, resulted in a progressively worsening economic profit position. The company’s performance suggests a need to improve operational efficiency and/or capital allocation strategies.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Twitter Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income (loss)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income8
Investment income, after taxes9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).

5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).

8 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the five-year period.

Net Income (Loss)
Initially, there was a substantial net loss of approximately -108 million US dollars at the end of 2017. This was followed by a strong recovery in 2018, with net income increasing sharply to nearly 1.2 billion US dollars. The positive trend continued into 2019, with net income reaching around 1.47 billion US dollars. However, the company experienced a pronounced reversal in 2020, recording a significant net loss of approximately -1.14 billion US dollars. This negative result persisted into 2021, albeit at a reduced loss of about -221 million US dollars. Overall, net income demonstrates high volatility, with a peak in 2019 and losses resurging in the last two years of the period.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT follows a similar pattern to net income, starting with a negative value of around -74 million US dollars in 2017. It then sharply increased to 443 million US dollars in 2018, followed by a slight decline to 382 million US dollars in 2019. A notable decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT dropping to a marginal positive figure of about 17.5 million US dollars, indicating a substantial reduction in operational profitability. In 2021, NOPAT turned negative again, reaching approximately -388 million US dollars, which reflects a deterioration in operational efficiency or increased operating costs relative to revenue.

In summary, both profitability measures indicate a period of growth and profitability in the middle years (2018–2019), contrasting sharply with losses and reduced operating performance in the earlier and later years. This suggests the company faced considerable challenges affecting its bottom line and operations towards the end of the examined timeframe.


Cash Operating Taxes

Twitter Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


Provision (benefit) for income taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes displays significant fluctuations over the analyzed periods. Initially, in 2017, the company reported a positive provision, indicating tax expenses amounting to approximately 12.6 million US dollars. Subsequently, in 2018 and 2019, the figures reflect substantial negative values, with benefits representing tax credits or reductions exceeding 782 million and 1.07 billion US dollars respectively. This shift suggests large tax benefits or loss carrybacks during these years. However, in 2020, the provision reverted sharply to a positive expense exceeding 1.08 billion US dollars, indicating a considerable tax charge. Lastly, in 2021, the provision again turned negative at around 190 million US dollars, signifying a tax benefit. This volatililty suggests that the company experienced considerable variability in taxable income, tax planning outcomes, or tax accounting treatments across the years.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes have generally remained within a more stable range compared to the provision for income taxes. The amounts paid in cash taxes fluctuated moderately between approximately 27.6 million and 51.6 million US dollars throughout the periods. The lowest cash taxes occurred in 2018 at roughly 27.6 million US dollars, while the highest payment was recorded in 2021 at approximately 51.6 million US dollars. The intermediate years show amounts oscillating around 41.8 million to 49.7 million US dollars. The overall trend suggests relatively consistent cash outflows for taxes despite the considerable volatility in the tax provision figures, which may indicate timing differences, deferred tax effects, or non-cash tax items affecting the taxable income reconciliation.

Invested Capital

Twitter Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Convertible notes, short-term
Finance lease liabilities, short-term
Convertible notes, long-term
Senior notes, long-term
Finance lease liabilities, long-term
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress7
Short-term investments8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction in progress.

8 Subtraction of short-term investments.


The financial data reveals several key trends in the company's capital structure and financial positioning over the five-year period ending in 2021.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
This liability measure shows a general upward trend throughout the period. Starting at approximately 2.34 billion USD in 2017, the amount increased significantly to around 3.49 billion USD in 2018. A slight decrease to roughly 3.29 billion USD is observed in 2019, but the figure rises sharply again in the two subsequent years, reaching approximately 4.48 billion USD in 2020 and peaking at about 5.55 billion USD by the end of 2021. This trend indicates a growing reliance on debt and lease obligations to finance operations or investments.
Stockholders’ Equity
Equity shows overall growth from 2017 to 2019, moving from around 5.05 billion USD to above 8.7 billion USD. However, this is followed by a decline in the two subsequent years, falling to roughly 7.97 billion USD in 2020 and further to about 7.31 billion USD in 2021. This decrease suggests potential distribution of earnings (such as dividends or share buybacks), losses, or other equity-reducing events during these years.
Invested Capital
Invested capital displays a solid overall upward trajectory. It starts at approximately 4.63 billion USD in 2017 and steadily rises each year, reaching close to 7.45 billion USD by 2021. The progression is consistent, with the most notable increases occurring from 2019 onward. This upward movement indicates an expanding base of capital utilized to support the company’s operations and growth initiatives.

In summary, the company has increasingly utilized debt and leases as part of its capital structure, while stockholders' equity experienced growth through 2019 followed by reductions in subsequent years. The consistent increase in invested capital underscores an ongoing expansion in financial resources employed by the company, reflecting potential investments in assets or operational capabilities. The interplay between rising debt and declining equity toward the end of the period may warrant further analysis regarding financial risk and capital cost optimization.


Cost of Capital

Twitter Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Twitter Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Alphabet Inc.
Comcast Corp.
Meta Platforms Inc.
Netflix Inc.
Trade Desk Inc.
Walt Disney Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance, as indicated by economic value added metrics, demonstrates a consistent decline in value creation over the observed period. Economic profit consistently registers as negative, and the economic spread ratio reflects a worsening trend in profitability relative to invested capital.

Economic Profit
Economic profit exhibits a pattern of increasing losses from 2017 to 2021. Beginning with a loss of US$655.505 thousand in 2017, the losses decreased to US$189.424 thousand in 2018, before increasing again to US$278.490 thousand in 2019. The losses then accelerated significantly, reaching US$735.555 thousand in 2020 and culminating in a substantial loss of US$1,241.022 thousand in 2021. This indicates a growing inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
Invested Capital
Invested capital generally increased throughout the period. From US$4,627.898 thousand in 2017, it rose to US$5,185.025 thousand in 2018 and US$5,287.225 thousand in 2019. Further increases were observed in 2020 (US$5,970.409 thousand) and 2021 (US$7,449.784 thousand). The growth in invested capital, coupled with declining economic profit, suggests diminishing returns on capital employed.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio, representing the percentage return on invested capital exceeding the cost of capital, consistently shows negative values. The ratio began at -14.16% in 2017, improved slightly to -3.65% in 2018, but then deteriorated steadily. It reached -5.27% in 2019, -12.32% in 2020, and further declined to -16.66% in 2021. This downward trend signifies a widening gap between the cost of capital and the returns generated by the invested capital, indicating increasing destruction of shareholder value.

In summary, the observed trends suggest a weakening financial position. While invested capital has been increasing, the company has consistently failed to generate sufficient economic profit to cover its cost of capital, resulting in a progressively worsening economic spread ratio.


Economic Profit Margin

Twitter Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Alphabet Inc.
Comcast Corp.
Meta Platforms Inc.
Netflix Inc.
Trade Desk Inc.
Walt Disney Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited a consistent decline over the five-year period. While economic profit fluctuated in absolute terms, the trend in economic profit margin indicates a worsening of profitability from an economic value perspective.

Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin began at -26.89% in 2017. This represents a substantial economic loss relative to adjusted revenue. A notable improvement was observed in 2018, with the margin increasing to -6.20%, suggesting a reduction in the magnitude of the economic loss. However, this improvement was short-lived. The margin deteriorated again in 2019 to -7.98%, and then experienced a more pronounced decline in 2020, reaching -19.83%. This downward trend continued into 2021, with the economic profit margin reaching -24.36%, the lowest value observed during the analyzed period.

The increasing negative values of the economic profit margin suggest that the company’s returns are consistently failing to cover the cost of capital. The magnitude of the decline accelerated in the later years of the period, indicating a growing disparity between economic profit and adjusted revenue. The relationship between adjusted revenue and economic profit suggests that while revenue increased over the period, the cost of generating that revenue, relative to the capital employed, also increased at a faster rate.

Relationship between Economic Profit and Adjusted Revenue
Adjusted revenue increased from US$2,437,464 thousand in 2017 to US$5,094,705 thousand in 2021. Despite this growth in revenue, economic profit remained negative throughout the period and increased in absolute value, moving from a loss of US$-655,505 thousand in 2017 to a loss of US$-1,241,022 thousand in 2021. This indicates that the growth in revenue was insufficient to offset the increasing economic costs, resulting in a worsening economic profit margin.

The consistent negative economic profit margin warrants further investigation into the underlying drivers of cost of capital and operational efficiency. The accelerating decline in the margin, particularly in 2020 and 2021, suggests a potential need for strategic adjustments to improve economic profitability.