Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The return on equity exhibited a strong upward trajectory between 2016 and 2018, followed by a period of relative stability and a final increase in 2021. This performance reflects a dynamic interplay between operational efficiency and the application of financial leverage.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- A general growth trend in asset efficiency is observed, with ROA increasing from 3.42% in 2016 to a peak of 6.30% in 2020. Although a moderation to 5.33% occurred in 2021, the overall level remained significantly higher than the 2016 baseline, indicating improved profitability relative to the total asset base over the analyzed period.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage displayed significant volatility throughout the period. After reaching a peak of 10.72 in 2018, the ratio experienced a notable contraction, reaching a low of 6.81 in 2020. A recovery followed in 2021, with the leverage ratio rising back to 8.60.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Disaggregation
- The expansion of ROE from 33.30% in 2016 to 46.85% in 2018 was driven by simultaneous increases in both ROA and financial leverage. Between 2019 and 2020, a structural shift occurred where the decline in financial leverage was offset by rising asset efficiency, maintaining ROE above 42%. The increase to 45.83% in 2021 was primarily supported by the rebound in financial leverage, which compensated for a slight decrease in ROA.
The analysis indicates that while financial leverage has been utilized to amplify returns, a fundamental improvement in the underlying profitability of assets provided a critical buffer for ROE during periods of deleveraging.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited a significant overall increase from 33.30% in 2016 to 45.83% in 2021, reaching a peak of 46.85% in 2018. The trajectory of ROE suggests a transition in the primary drivers of shareholder returns over the six-year period.
- Net Profit Margin
- A general upward trend in profitability is observed, with the margin expanding from 12.79% in 2016 to 17.32% in 2021. Despite a temporary decline to 12.16% in 2018, the margin experienced consistent growth from 2019 through 2021, indicating strengthened pricing power or improved operational cost control.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization efficiency improved from 0.27 in 2016, peaking at 0.37 in 2020 before moderating to 0.31 in 2021. While this component provided a positive contribution to the ROE during the middle of the period, it remained a less volatile driver than margins or leverage.
- Financial Leverage
- The leverage ratio demonstrated substantial volatility, rising from 9.74 in 2016 to a peak of 10.72 in 2018, followed by a sharp contraction to 6.81 by 2020. A subsequent increase to 8.60 in 2021 indicates a fluctuating approach to capital structure and debt utilization.
The analysis reveals that the peak ROE observed in 2018 was primarily driven by high financial leverage. In contrast, the sustained high ROE from 2019 to 2021 was supported by an expanding net profit margin, which effectively offset the reduction in financial leverage observed during that period. This suggests a shift toward a higher-quality ROE driven by operational profitability rather than financial gearing.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibits a general upward trajectory over the analyzed period, increasing from 33.30% in 2016 to 45.83% in 2021. This expansion is characterized by a peak in 2018 at 46.85%, followed by a period of stabilization and a subsequent recovery toward the end of the timeframe.
- Tax Burden
- A consistent improvement in the tax burden ratio is observed, rising steadily from 0.67 in 2016 to 0.77 in 2020 and 2021. This trend indicates a reduction in the effective tax rate, which has served as a persistent positive driver for net income and ROE.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remains remarkably stable, fluctuating narrowly between 0.95 and 0.98. This suggests that interest expenses have had a minimal and consistent impact on the conversion of operating income to pre-tax income.
- EBIT Margin
- Operating profitability demonstrates a general increase, moving from 19.63% in 2016 to 22.80% in 2021. Although a significant contraction to 17.06% occurred in 2018, the subsequent recovery and growth indicate improved operational efficiency and stronger earnings power over the long term.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization shows moderate volatility. The ratio improved from 0.27 in 2016 to a peak of 0.37 in 2020, before declining to 0.31 in 2021. This indicates that while asset efficiency improved initially, there was a recent decrease in the revenue generated per unit of asset.
- Financial Leverage
- The financial leverage ratio exhibits the highest degree of variance among the components. After peaking at 10.72 in 2018, leverage decreased sharply to 6.81 by 2020, before rebounding to 8.60 in 2021. This volatility suggests significant shifts in the capital structure or changes in the equity base during this period.
Overall, the growth in ROE has been primarily supported by an improving tax position and expanding operating margins. While financial leverage provided a significant boost to ROE in 2018, the later years show a shift toward more sustainable growth driven by operational performance and tax efficiency, despite fluctuations in asset turnover and leverage.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a general upward trajectory between June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2020, before experiencing a contraction in 2021. The overall growth from 3.42% to a peak of 6.30% indicates an improvement in the capacity to generate earnings from the asset base, although the final period reflects a moderation in this efficiency.
- Net Profit Margin
- A consistent long-term expansion in profitability is observed, with the margin increasing from 12.79% in 2016 to 17.32% in 2021. Despite a temporary dip to 12.16% in 2018, the margin grew steadily in the subsequent years, suggesting enhanced operational efficiency or improved cost management in converting revenue into net profit.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization showed moderate growth and volatility over the analyzed period. The ratio improved from 0.27 in 2016 to a peak of 0.37 in 2020, signaling an increase in the efficiency of assets used to generate revenue. However, this trend reversed in 2021, with the ratio declining to 0.31.
- ROA Disaggregation Drivers
- The fluctuations in ROA were driven by the interaction between profit margins and asset turnover. Between 2016 and 2020, both components generally improved, leading to a steady rise in ROA. In 2021, a divergence occurred: while the net profit margin continued to rise, the decline in asset turnover outweighed these gains, resulting in the ROA decreasing from 6.30% to 5.33%.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a general upward trajectory over the analyzed six-year period, increasing from 3.42% in 2016 to 5.33% in 2021. The peak performance was recorded in 2020 at 6.30%, driven by the confluence of expanded operating margins, optimized asset utilization, and an improved tax burden.
- Tax Burden
- A consistent upward trend is observed in the tax burden ratio, which rose from 0.67 in 2016 to 0.77 by 2021. This progression indicates an increase in the proportion of pre-tax income retained as net income, suggesting a reduction in the effective tax rate over the period.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained highly stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.95 and 0.98. This stability suggests that interest expenses have had a negligible and consistent impact on the conversion of operating profits to pre-tax income.
- EBIT Margin
- Operating profitability demonstrated an overall expansion, rising from 19.63% in 2016 to 22.80% in 2021. Despite a significant contraction in 2018, where the margin fell to 17.06%, the subsequent recovery and steady growth indicate improved core operational efficiency.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization exhibited volatility, characterized by an initial period of improvement followed by a recent decline. The ratio increased from 0.27 in 2016 to a peak of 0.37 in 2020, before decreasing to 0.31 in 2021, reflecting fluctuations in the efficiency of asset deployment to generate revenue.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The net profit margin exhibited a general upward trajectory over the six-year period, increasing from 12.79% in 2016 to 17.32% in 2021. While a temporary contraction occurred in 2018, the subsequent years showed consistent growth, indicating an improvement in the company's ability to convert revenue into actual profit.
- Operating Efficiency (EBIT Margin)
- The EBIT margin served as the primary driver of profitability. It followed a pattern similar to the net profit margin, peaking at 22.80% by 2021. A notable decline to 17.06% in 2018 coincided with the dip in net profit, suggesting that operating costs or revenue pressures during that period were the main cause of the overall margin compression. However, the recovery to levels above 22% from 2019 onwards reflects strengthened operational performance.
- Tax Efficiency (Tax Burden)
- The tax burden ratio showed a steady and consistent increase from 0.67 in 2016 to 0.77 in 2021. This upward trend indicates a reduction in the effective tax rate, meaning a larger proportion of pre-tax income was retained as net income. This improvement contributed positively to the expansion of the net profit margin over the analyzed timeframe.
- Financing Impact (Interest Burden)
- The interest burden remained remarkably stable, fluctuating minimally between 0.95 and 0.98. The proximity of these values to 1.0 suggests that interest expenses had a negligible impact on the disaggregation of the net profit margin, indicating a well-managed debt level relative to operating earnings.
In summary, the expansion of the net profit margin was achieved through a combination of recovered operating efficiency and a favorable trend in tax burdens. The stability of the interest burden confirms that the profitability gains were driven by operational and fiscal factors rather than changes in the company's financing structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?