EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Axon Enterprise Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Axon Enterprise Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initially, the company experienced economic losses, followed by a substantial shift to economic profit in the most recent year. This analysis details the observed trends in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, invested capital, and their combined impact on economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited considerable volatility. It decreased significantly from 2018 to 2019, then recovered in 2020, followed by a further decline in 2021. However, a dramatic increase in NOPAT occurred in 2022, reaching its highest value over the observed period. This suggests a substantial improvement in operational profitability in the latest year.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2021, fluctuating within a narrow range around 14.9%. A slight decrease was observed in 2022, falling to 14.28%. This indicates a marginal reduction in the company’s funding costs in the most recent year.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed an increasing trend throughout the period. It decreased from 2018 to 2019, but then increased substantially in 2020 and 2021. The largest increase occurred between 2021 and 2022, indicating significant capital deployment during that time. This growth in invested capital suggests expansion or increased investment in operations.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative from 2018 through 2021, indicating that the company’s returns were insufficient to cover its cost of capital. The magnitude of the economic loss increased from 2018 to 2021, reaching a peak in 2021. However, a significant turnaround occurred in 2022, with economic profit becoming positive and reaching a substantial value. This positive economic profit suggests that the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital in the latest year, driven primarily by the substantial increase in NOPAT.
In summary, the company transitioned from a period of economic losses to a period of economic profit. This shift is attributable to a combination of increased NOPAT and a slight decrease in the cost of capital, despite a continued increase in invested capital. The substantial improvement in 2022 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers of the increased profitability.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued warranty expense.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
- Net Income (Loss)
- The company experienced significant fluctuations in net income over the analyzed period. Starting with a substantial net income of $29,205 thousand in 2018, there was a sharp decline to $882 thousand in 2019, followed by a transition into losses in 2020 and 2021, with amounts of -$1,724 thousand and -$60,018 thousand, respectively. In 2022, the company reversed this trend dramatically, recording a significant net income of $147,139 thousand. This volatility indicates periods of financial difficulty followed by a substantial recovery and profitability improvement in the most recent year.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT demonstrated a somewhat different pattern, though it also showed variability. The value started at $78,057 thousand in 2018 and then decreased considerably to $17,857 thousand in 2019. In 2020, NOPAT increased to $51,762 thousand, suggesting operational profitability improvement despite the net loss reported that year. A decline occurred again in 2021 to $38,523 thousand; however, a substantial increase to $326,174 thousand was evident in 2022. This increase in 2022 indicates enhanced operational efficiency and profitability on an after-tax basis.
- Overall Trends and Insights
- The data reveal a period of instability between 2018 and 2021, characterized by fluctuating and often negative net income, contrasted with positive but volatile NOPAT values. The divergence between net income and NOPAT especially during 2020 and 2021 suggests that non-operating factors or extraordinary charges may have negatively impacted net income. The strong recovery in 2022 across both net income and NOPAT points to improved financial health, possibly driven by operational improvements or a favorable change in the cost or revenue structure. The considerable growth in 2022 in both metrics reflects a pivotal turnaround likely resulting from strategic adjustments or market conditions.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision for income taxes (income tax benefit)
- Over the five-year period, the provision for income taxes exhibited significant volatility and fluctuation. Initially, there was a negative provision in 2018, indicating an income tax benefit of 1,101 thousand US dollars. This turned positive in 2019, reaching 1,188 thousand US dollars, followed by another shift back to a negative provision in 2020 at -4,567 thousand US dollars. The most pronounced change occurred in 2021 with a substantial negative provision amounting to -81,357 thousand US dollars, suggesting a major income tax benefit that year. However, in 2022, the provision reversed to a positive figure of 49,379 thousand US dollars.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes demonstrated a generally increasing trend over the analyzed period, with a pronounced exception in 2021. Starting at 7,666 thousand US dollars in 2018, the amount increased steadily to 9,266 thousand US dollars in 2019 and further to 12,034 thousand US dollars in 2020. In 2021, there was a sharp decline, with cash operating taxes reported as negative 851 thousand US dollars, indicating a cash inflow or refund situation. Subsequently, in 2022, the cash operating taxes surged significantly to 27,888 thousand US dollars, more than doubling the previous peak.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of accrued warranty expense.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction-in-process.
9 Subtraction of investments.
The financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's capital structure and financial positioning over the five-year period ending in 2022.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- There is a relatively stable and moderate level of debt from 2018 through 2021, fluctuating between approximately 10.6 million and 27 million USD. However, in 2022, this figure experiences a dramatic increase to over 717 million USD. This sharp rise indicates a significant change in the company's financing strategy or capital structure, suggesting either a substantial new borrowing, lease obligation, or financial arrangement undertaken in the latest period.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders' equity shows steady growth throughout all years, moving from around 467 million USD in 2018 to approximately 1.27 billion USD in 2022. The increase suggests consistent retention of earnings or capital injections, strengthening the company's net worth and reflecting profitable operations or equity financing activities.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital fluctuates during the initial years, decreasing from roughly 632 million USD in 2018 to 500 million USD in 2019, then rising again to 723 million USD in 2020. From 2020 onward, invested capital increases significantly, peaking at approximately 1.61 billion USD by the end of 2022. This upward trend illustrates increased capital employed in the business, likely fuelled by the substantial growth in reported debt and equity, indicating expanded operational scale or investment in long-term assets.
Overall, the data suggests a period of gradual growth and stability up to 2021, followed by a marked increase in financial leverage and total capital employed in 2022. The spike in reported debt and leases may raise considerations regarding risk and debt service capacity, while the ongoing growth in equity and invested capital reflects a larger asset base and potentially heightened business activities.
Cost of Capital
Axon Enterprise Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible notes3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible notes. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible notes3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible notes. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible notes3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible notes. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible notes3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible notes. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible notes3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible notes. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the ratio demonstrated a substantial decline from 2018 to 2019, followed by a period of relative stabilization before experiencing a marked deterioration in 2021. A significant positive shift occurred in 2022, resulting in a positive economic spread ratio.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio was -2.53%. This value decreased considerably to -11.35% in 2019, indicating a widening gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. The ratio improved slightly to -7.76% in 2020, but then worsened to -11.86% in 2021, suggesting continued underperformance relative to capital costs. A substantial improvement was observed in 2022, with the ratio reaching 6.00%, signifying that the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital.
The economic spread ratio’s movement closely mirrors the trend in economic profit. Negative economic profit values were recorded from 2018 through 2021, consistent with the negative economic spread ratios during those years. The positive economic profit reported in 2022 aligns with the positive economic spread ratio achieved in that year.
- Invested Capital and Economic Spread
- Invested capital increased over the period, from US$631,660 thousand in 2018 to US$1,607,800 thousand in 2022. Despite this increase in capital employed, the economic spread ratio remained negative for the majority of the period, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of the invested capital until 2022. The substantial increase in invested capital in 2021 did not translate into improved profitability relative to capital costs until the following year.
The shift to a positive economic spread ratio in 2022 suggests improved operational efficiency, enhanced pricing strategies, or a more favorable economic environment, enabling the company to generate returns that surpass its cost of capital. Further investigation would be required to pinpoint the specific drivers of this improvement.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the margin trended downward for several years before becoming positive in the most recent period. This suggests a notable shift in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2018, the economic profit margin was -3.36%. This indicates that the company’s economic profit was 3.36% lower than its net sales. The margin deteriorated substantially in 2019, reaching -10.23%, and continued to decline, albeit at a slower rate, to -7.47% in 2020. The most significant decline occurred in 2021, with the margin falling to -14.41%, representing the largest negative value within the observed period.
- A substantial reversal is observed in 2022, with the economic profit margin increasing to 7.17%. This represents a significant improvement and indicates that the company generated economic profit equivalent to 7.17% of its net sales. This positive margin suggests improved operational efficiency, effective capital allocation, or a combination of both.
The movement in economic profit mirrors the trend in the economic profit margin. Negative economic profit values were recorded from 2018 through 2021, aligning with the negative margins. The transition to positive economic profit in 2022, reaching US$96,526 thousand, directly corresponds with the positive economic profit margin achieved in that year.
- Relationship between Adjusted Net Sales and Economic Profit Margin
- Adjusted net sales consistently increased throughout the period, rising from US$476,219 thousand in 2018 to US$1,346,663 thousand in 2022. Despite this consistent growth in sales, the economic profit margin remained negative until 2022. This suggests that the growth in sales alone was insufficient to offset the costs associated with generating those sales and meeting the company’s cost of capital. The positive margin in 2022 indicates that the company was able to leverage its increased sales to achieve profitability exceeding its cost of capital.
The substantial improvement in the economic profit margin in 2022 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers of this change. Factors such as cost reductions, pricing strategies, or more efficient capital deployment could be contributing to the observed positive trend.