EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
3M Co. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Cash Flow Statement
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to 3M Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
Cost of capital2 | ||||||
Invested capital3 | ||||||
Economic profit4 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes showed fluctuations over the analyzed period. It increased from 5,388 million US dollars in 2017 to 5,630 million in 2018, followed by a decline to 4,679 million in 2019. In 2020, there was a recovery, with NOPAT rising to 5,797 million and subsequently continuing to grow to 6,058 million in 2021. Overall, the trend indicates resilience and improvement after a dip in 2019.
- Cost of capital
- The cost of capital demonstrated a generally declining trend from 12.92% in 2017 to 11.95% in 2019, suggesting reduced capital expenses during this timeframe. However, it slightly increased to 12.11% in 2020 and marginally to 12.15% in 2021, indicating a modest rise in capital costs towards the end of the period.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital experienced steady growth throughout the period. Beginning at 32,308 million US dollars in 2017, it slightly decreased to 31,616 million in 2018 but then increased significantly to 38,698 million in 2019. It remained relatively stable in 2020 and 2021, reaching 38,880 million and 39,156 million respectively. This pattern implies ongoing investment activity with a substantial jump in 2019.
- Economic profit
- Economic profit depicted considerable volatility during the observed period. It began at 1,215 million US dollars in 2017, increased to 1,586 million in 2018, then sharply declined to 54 million in 2019. Thereafter, there was a robust recovery to 1,088 million in 2020 and further growth to 1,301 million in 2021. The sharp drop in 2019 suggests that the company struggled to generate returns above its cost of capital that year; however, subsequent years demonstrated a strong rebound.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring action balances.
6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to 3M.
7 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
8 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to 3M.
10 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income Attributable to 3M
- The net income exhibits a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Starting at 4,858 million USD in 2017, it increased to 5,349 million USD in 2018, indicating a positive growth. However, there was a decline in 2019, with net income falling to 4,570 million USD. This downward shift was followed by a recovery in 2020 and 2021, reaching 5,384 million USD and 5,921 million USD respectively, signaling an overall increasing trajectory towards the end of the period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT shows similar variability with a general upward movement. It rose from 5,388 million USD in 2017 to 5,630 million USD in 2018, before dropping to 4,679 million USD in 2019, reflecting a noticeable dip in operational profitability after taxes. Subsequently, NOPAT recovered significantly in 2020 and 2021, achieving 5,797 million USD and 6,058 million USD respectively. This rebound suggests improved operational efficiency and tax impact post-2019.
- Overall Summary
- Both the net income and NOPAT follow a similar pattern characterized by growth in the early years, a decline in 2019, and a strong rebound in the last two years. The dip in 2019 indicates potential challenges during that period, impacting both profitability and operational returns after taxes. The recovery phase through 2020 and 2021 suggests strategic or market conditions improving, leading to enhanced financial performance. The data implies resilience and a return to growth momentum after a temporary setback.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of the provided financial data reveals a notable trend in the company's tax-related figures over a five-year period from 2017 to 2021.
- Provision for Income Taxes
-
This figure shows a significant and consistent decline from 2017 through 2019, decreasing from US$2,679 million in 2017 to US$1,130 million in 2019. The trend then stabilizes somewhat in the following years, with a slight increase to US$1,318 million in 2020 before a marginal decrease to US$1,285 million in 2021.
- Cash Operating Taxes
-
Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar downward pattern initially, falling from US$2,524 million in 2017 to US$1,349 million in 2019. After this period, the figure rises again in 2020 to US$1,585 million and remains relatively stable into 2021 at US$1,557 million. This suggests some recovery or stabilization in cash tax payments following the prior decline.
Overall, both provisions for income taxes and cash operating taxes experienced a marked reduction between 2017 and 2019. Subsequently, from 2020 onward, there appears to be a trend toward stabilization or slight recovery in tax-related expenses, although these amounts have not returned to the higher levels seen in 2017. This pattern could indicate changes in profitability, tax planning strategies, or tax law impacts over the examined period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of product warranty liabilities.
6 Addition of accrued restructuring action balances.
7 Addition of equity equivalents to total 3M Company shareholders’ equity.
8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
9 Subtraction of construction in progress.
10 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases increased notably from 15,091 million USD at the end of 2017 to 21,299 million USD by the end of 2019. However, a declining trend is observed afterward, with the total reducing to 19,775 million USD in 2020 and further to 18,317 million USD in 2021. This indicates an initial period of increased leverage followed by a consistent effort to reduce debt and lease obligations over the last two years.
- Total 3M Company Shareholders’ Equity
- Shareholders’ equity showed a downward trend from 11,563 million USD in 2017 to 9,796 million USD in 2018, indicating a reduction in net assets during that period. From 2018 onwards, equity exhibited a recovery and growth, climbing to 10,063 million USD in 2019, then more significantly increasing to 12,867 million USD in 2020 and reaching 15,046 million USD in 2021. This reflects improving retained earnings or capital infusions contributing to the strengthening of the equity base over the latter years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital was relatively stable between 2017 and 2018, with marginal decrease from 32,308 million USD to 31,616 million USD. In 2019, a considerable increase occurred, bringing the invested capital to 38,698 million USD. This level was maintained with slight increments through 2020 and 2021, totaling 38,880 million USD and 39,156 million USD respectively. This pattern suggests significant new investments or assets acquisition in 2019, followed by stabilization of capital deployment in subsequent years.
- Overall Insights
- The combined analysis suggests a strategic shift over the reported period. After increasing debt levels through 2019, the company appears to focus on deleveraging in 2020 and 2021, coinciding with rising shareholders' equity and steady invested capital. This could imply improved profitability, asset management, or capital restructuring efforts enhancing the company's financial stability and reducing reliance on borrowed funds.
Cost of Capital
3M Co., cost of capital calculations
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Economic profit1 | ||||||
Invested capital2 | ||||||
Performance Ratio | ||||||
Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the annual financial data over a five-year period reveals several notable trends and variations in the company's economic profit, invested capital, and economic spread ratio.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit exhibited fluctuations during the period. Starting at 1,215 million US dollars in 2017, it increased to a peak of 1,586 million in 2018. However, there was a significant drop in 2019 to 54 million, indicating a sharp decline in profitability for that year. This was followed by a recovery in 2020 with economic profit rising again to 1,088 million, and further growth in 2021 to 1,301 million. Despite the dip in 2019, the overall trend suggests a resilient return to strong economic profit levels by the end of the period.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital showed a general upward trend with some variability. It decreased slightly from 32,308 million US dollars in 2017 to 31,616 million in 2018, before a substantial increase to 38,698 million in 2019. From 2019 onwards, the invested capital remained relatively stable, with slight incremental rises to 38,880 million in 2020 and 39,156 million in 2021. This pattern indicates an expansion of capital investment primarily occurring around 2019, followed by stabilization in the subsequent years.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, which measures the return on invested capital relative to its cost, showed variability corresponding to the economic profit pattern. It started at 3.76% in 2017, increased to 5.02% in 2018, then dropped sharply to 0.14% in 2019. This low in 2019 reflects the nearly neutral economic profit of that year. The ratio improved markedly to 2.80% in 2020 and further to 3.32% in 2021. The ratio trends corroborate the recovery and improvement in profitability and capital utilization after the decline in 2019.
Overall, the data suggest that 2019 was an anomalous year with significantly reduced economic profit and economic spread, despite increased invested capital. The company demonstrated recovery and improvement in the following years with both economic profit and economic spread ratios rising, although invested capital remained largely stable post-2019 expansion. This indicates effective management of capital resources and a return to productive investment generating positive returns.
Economic Profit Margin
Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Economic profit1 | ||||||
Net sales | ||||||
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
Adjusted net sales | ||||||
Performance Ratio | ||||||
Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data indicates several notable trends over the five-year period analyzed.
- Economic profit
- The economic profit exhibited significant fluctuations throughout the period. Starting at 1,215 million US$ in 2017, it rose to a peak of 1,586 million US$ in 2018, before experiencing a steep decline to just 54 million US$ in 2019. Subsequently, it recovered to 1,088 million US$ in 2020 and further increased to 1,301 million US$ in 2021. This pattern suggests a sharp disruption in 2019, followed by a steady rebound in the following years.
- Adjusted net sales
- Adjusted net sales showed a generally upward trend over the period. The sales increased from 31,641 million US$ in 2017 to 32,869 million US$ in 2018, declined slightly to 31,949 million US$ in 2019, and then resumed growth to reach 35,386 million US$ by the end of 2021. Although a minor dip occurred in 2019, overall sales demonstrated resilience and growth potential.
- Economic profit margin
- The economic profit margin closely mirrored the movements in economic profit. It started at 3.84% in 2017, increased to 4.83% in 2018, sharply dropped to 0.17% in 2019, but recovered to 3.37% in 2020 and then improved to 3.68% in 2021. This margin pattern highlights the 2019 year as an outlier with drastically reduced profitability relative to sales, before a return toward historical margin levels.
Overall, the data reveals a significant downturn in financial performance in 2019 across both profitability measures, while adjusted net sales showed only a slight decline. The subsequent two years showed recovery in both profit and profit margins, accompanying resumption of sales growth. The volatility in economic profit and margin in 2019 may indicate specific operational challenges or external factors impacting profitability during that year.