Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
3M Co. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to 3M Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
3M Co., economic profit calculation
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates fluctuating economic profit performance. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited initial growth, followed by a decline, and then a recovery. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, while invested capital showed an increasing trend over the five-year period. These factors combined to produce varying levels of economic profit.
- NOPAT Trend
- NOPAT increased from US$5,388 million in 2017 to US$5,630 million in 2018, representing a modest gain. A subsequent decrease was observed in 2019, with NOPAT falling to US$4,679 million. The following year, 2020, saw a recovery to US$5,797 million, and this upward trend continued into 2021, reaching US$6,058 million. This suggests a cyclical pattern or responsiveness to external economic factors.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital experienced a slight decrease from 15.20% in 2017 to 15.02% in 2018. It then declined further to 14.01% in 2019 before increasing slightly to 14.20% in 2020 and 14.25% in 2021. The overall fluctuation was minimal, indicating a relatively consistent financing environment during the period.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed a consistent upward trend throughout the period. Starting at US$32,308 million in 2017, it decreased slightly to US$31,616 million in 2018, then increased significantly to US$38,698 million in 2019. This growth continued in 2020 and 2021, reaching US$38,880 million and US$39,156 million respectively. This suggests ongoing investment in the business.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was positive in 2017 and 2018, at US$479 million and US$880 million respectively. However, it turned negative in 2019, reaching -US$742 million. A recovery occurred in 2020, with economic profit reaching US$276 million, and further improvement was seen in 2021, returning to US$479 million. The economic profit closely mirrors the NOPAT trend, but is also influenced by the level of invested capital and the cost of that capital. The negative economic profit in 2019 indicates that the return on invested capital was less than the cost of capital during that year.
In summary, while NOPAT and invested capital generally trended upwards, the economic profit experienced significant volatility. The period of negative economic profit in 2019 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers and assess the effectiveness of capital allocation strategies.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
3M Co., NOPAT calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring action balances.
6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to 3M.
7 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
8 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to 3M.
10 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income Attributable to 3M
- The net income exhibits a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Starting at 4,858 million USD in 2017, it increased to 5,349 million USD in 2018, indicating a positive growth. However, there was a decline in 2019, with net income falling to 4,570 million USD. This downward shift was followed by a recovery in 2020 and 2021, reaching 5,384 million USD and 5,921 million USD respectively, signaling an overall increasing trajectory towards the end of the period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT shows similar variability with a general upward movement. It rose from 5,388 million USD in 2017 to 5,630 million USD in 2018, before dropping to 4,679 million USD in 2019, reflecting a noticeable dip in operational profitability after taxes. Subsequently, NOPAT recovered significantly in 2020 and 2021, achieving 5,797 million USD and 6,058 million USD respectively. This rebound suggests improved operational efficiency and tax impact post-2019.
- Overall Summary
- Both the net income and NOPAT follow a similar pattern characterized by growth in the early years, a decline in 2019, and a strong rebound in the last two years. The dip in 2019 indicates potential challenges during that period, impacting both profitability and operational returns after taxes. The recovery phase through 2020 and 2021 suggests strategic or market conditions improving, leading to enhanced financial performance. The data implies resilience and a return to growth momentum after a temporary setback.
Cash Operating Taxes
3M Co., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of the provided financial data reveals a notable trend in the company's tax-related figures over a five-year period from 2017 to 2021.
- Provision for Income Taxes
-
This figure shows a significant and consistent decline from 2017 through 2019, decreasing from US$2,679 million in 2017 to US$1,130 million in 2019. The trend then stabilizes somewhat in the following years, with a slight increase to US$1,318 million in 2020 before a marginal decrease to US$1,285 million in 2021.
- Cash Operating Taxes
-
Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar downward pattern initially, falling from US$2,524 million in 2017 to US$1,349 million in 2019. After this period, the figure rises again in 2020 to US$1,585 million and remains relatively stable into 2021 at US$1,557 million. This suggests some recovery or stabilization in cash tax payments following the prior decline.
Overall, both provisions for income taxes and cash operating taxes experienced a marked reduction between 2017 and 2019. Subsequently, from 2020 onward, there appears to be a trend toward stabilization or slight recovery in tax-related expenses, although these amounts have not returned to the higher levels seen in 2017. This pattern could indicate changes in profitability, tax planning strategies, or tax law impacts over the examined period.
Invested Capital
3M Co., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of product warranty liabilities.
6 Addition of accrued restructuring action balances.
7 Addition of equity equivalents to total 3M Company shareholders’ equity.
8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
9 Subtraction of construction in progress.
10 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases increased notably from 15,091 million USD at the end of 2017 to 21,299 million USD by the end of 2019. However, a declining trend is observed afterward, with the total reducing to 19,775 million USD in 2020 and further to 18,317 million USD in 2021. This indicates an initial period of increased leverage followed by a consistent effort to reduce debt and lease obligations over the last two years.
- Total 3M Company Shareholders’ Equity
- Shareholders’ equity showed a downward trend from 11,563 million USD in 2017 to 9,796 million USD in 2018, indicating a reduction in net assets during that period. From 2018 onwards, equity exhibited a recovery and growth, climbing to 10,063 million USD in 2019, then more significantly increasing to 12,867 million USD in 2020 and reaching 15,046 million USD in 2021. This reflects improving retained earnings or capital infusions contributing to the strengthening of the equity base over the latter years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital was relatively stable between 2017 and 2018, with marginal decrease from 32,308 million USD to 31,616 million USD. In 2019, a considerable increase occurred, bringing the invested capital to 38,698 million USD. This level was maintained with slight increments through 2020 and 2021, totaling 38,880 million USD and 39,156 million USD respectively. This pattern suggests significant new investments or assets acquisition in 2019, followed by stabilization of capital deployment in subsequent years.
- Overall Insights
- The combined analysis suggests a strategic shift over the reported period. After increasing debt levels through 2019, the company appears to focus on deleveraging in 2020 and 2021, coinciding with rising shareholders' equity and steady invested capital. This could imply improved profitability, asset management, or capital restructuring efforts enhancing the company's financial stability and reducing reliance on borrowed funds.
Cost of Capital
3M Co., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
3M Co., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period between 2017 and 2021 demonstrates fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic value added metrics. Economic profit exhibited volatility, transitioning from positive values in 2017, 2018, and 2021 to a substantial loss in 2019, followed by a recovery in 2020. Invested capital generally increased over the five-year span, although a slight decrease was noted between 2017 and 2018. The economic spread ratio, reflecting the relationship between economic profit and invested capital, mirrored the profit fluctuations, showing both positive and negative values throughout the period.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$479 million in 2017 and increased significantly to US$880 million in 2018. A considerable decline followed in 2019, resulting in an economic loss of US$742 million. This was partially recovered in 2020 with a profit of US$276 million, and then returned to the 2017 level of US$479 million in 2021. The volatility suggests sensitivity to underlying business conditions or strategic shifts.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$32,308 million in 2017 to US$31,616 million in 2018. Subsequently, it increased steadily over the remaining years, reaching US$39,156 million by 2021. This upward trend indicates ongoing investment in the business, despite the fluctuations in economic profit.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio peaked at 2.78% in 2018, coinciding with the highest economic profit during the observed period. A substantial decrease occurred in 2019, resulting in a negative spread of -1.92%, reflecting the economic loss. The ratio recovered to 0.71% in 2020 and further to 1.22% in 2021, indicating improving, but not fully restored, profitability relative to invested capital. The negative spread in 2019 suggests that the return on invested capital was insufficient to cover the cost of capital during that year.
Overall, the analysis reveals a period of inconsistent economic performance. While invested capital generally increased, economic profit and the economic spread ratio experienced significant swings, highlighting potential challenges in generating returns commensurate with capital employed, particularly in 2019.
Economic Profit Margin
3M Co., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2017 and 2021. Initial positive values transitioned to a substantial loss before recovering, demonstrating volatility in the company’s value creation relative to its cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at 1.51% in 2017, increasing to a peak of 2.68% in 2018. This indicates improving profitability and efficient capital utilization during this period. However, a significant decline occurred in 2019, resulting in a negative margin of -2.32%. This suggests that the company’s returns were insufficient to cover its cost of capital. A partial recovery was observed in 2020, with the margin reaching 0.85%, followed by a further improvement to 1.35% in 2021. While positive, the 2021 margin remained below the 2018 level.
- Relationship to Adjusted Net Sales
- Adjusted net sales showed a generally upward trend over the period, increasing from US$31,641 million in 2017 to US$35,386 million in 2021. Despite this revenue growth, the economic profit margin did not consistently benefit. The substantial decline in margin in 2019 occurred alongside a slight decrease in adjusted net sales, suggesting that factors beyond revenue, such as increased costs or a higher cost of capital, played a significant role. The margin improvement in 2020 and 2021 coincided with increases in adjusted net sales, indicating a positive correlation, but the margin did not return to its previous high.
The observed pattern suggests that while the company has been able to grow sales, maintaining consistent economic profitability has been challenging. The significant negative margin in 2019 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying causes and prevent recurrence. The recent recovery in the economic profit margin is encouraging, but continued monitoring is necessary to ensure sustained value creation.