Anadarko Petroleum Corp. operates in 3 segments: Oil and gas exploration and production; Midstream; and Marketing.
Segment Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas exploration and production | 52.67% | 56.32% | 84.33% | 68.45% | 70.42% |
| Midstream | 39.11% | 54.60% | 36.22% | 34.05% | 36.92% |
| Marketing | -29.60% | -35.52% | -42.36% | -23.54% | -20.97% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The segment profit margins exhibit significant volatility, characterized by a sharp contraction in the primary production segment and persistent losses within the marketing operations. While exploration and production historically served as the primary driver of profitability, the latter portion of the period shows a marked decline in efficiency. In contrast, midstream operations remained relatively stable, and the marketing segment demonstrated a gradual reduction in its negative margins after a significant trough.
- Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
- A peak in profitability was reached in 2014 at 84.33%, following a period of relative stability. However, a substantial downward trend emerged thereafter, with margins falling to 56.32% in 2015 and further declining to 52.67% by the end of 2016. This indicates a significant erosion of profit margins in the core production business over the final two years of the analyzed period.
- Midstream
- This segment displayed the highest level of stability, generally maintaining margins within the 34% to 39% range. A notable exception occurred in 2015, when the profit margin spiked to 54.60%, before returning to 39.11% in 2016, suggesting a temporary increase in operational efficiency or a one-time favorable event.
- Marketing
- Margins in the marketing segment remained consistently negative throughout the reporting period, identifying it as a loss-generating activity. The most severe deficit occurred in 2014, with margins dropping to -42.36%. Following this low, a recovery trend is observed, with margins improving to -35.52% in 2015 and -29.60% in 2016.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Profit Margin: Oil and gas exploration and production
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDAX | 3,604) | 4,456) | 12,505) | 9,238) | 8,500) |
| Revenues | 6,842) | 7,912) | 14,828) | 13,495) | 12,070) |
| Segment Profitability Ratio | |||||
| Segment profit margin1 | 52.67% | 56.32% | 84.33% | 68.45% | 70.42% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Adjusted EBITDAX ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 3,604 ÷ 6,842 = 52.67%
The financial performance of the oil and gas exploration and production segment was characterized by a period of growth and margin expansion between 2012 and 2014, followed by a substantial contraction in both top-line revenue and operational profitability through 2016.
- Revenue and Adjusted EBITDAX Trajectory
- A positive growth trend is observed from 2012 to 2014, with revenues increasing from US$ 12,070 million to a peak of US$ 14,828 million. Adjusted EBITDAX followed a similar trajectory, rising from US$ 8,500 million to US$ 12,505 million over the same period. This growth trend reversed sharply in 2015, as revenues fell to US$ 7,912 million and Adjusted EBITDAX plummeted to US$ 4,456 million. This downward trend persisted into 2016, with revenues ending at US$ 6,842 million and Adjusted EBITDAX at US$ 3,604 million.
- Segment Profit Margin Volatility
- The segment profit margin exhibited significant fluctuation over the five-year period. While the margin dipped slightly from 70.42% in 2012 to 68.45% in 2013, it reached a peak of 84.33% in 2014, coinciding with the peak in revenues and Adjusted EBITDAX. Following this peak, a severe compression occurred, with the margin falling to 56.32% in 2015 and further decreasing to 52.67% by the end of 2016.
- Analysis of Operational Decline
- The data indicates a high sensitivity to market conditions starting in 2015. The precipitous drop in Adjusted EBITDAX, which fell by approximately 64% between 2014 and 2015, outpaced the decline in revenues, which fell by approximately 47% in the same timeframe. This discrepancy resulted in the observed contraction of the segment profit margin, signaling a period of diminished operational efficiency or an unfavorable shift in the cost-to-revenue ratio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Profit Margin: Midstream
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDAX | 797) | 1,056) | 660) | 508) | 474) |
| Revenues | 2,038) | 1,934) | 1,822) | 1,492) | 1,284) |
| Segment Profitability Ratio | |||||
| Segment profit margin1 | 39.11% | 54.60% | 36.22% | 34.05% | 36.92% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Adjusted EBITDAX ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 797 ÷ 2,038 = 39.11%
The Midstream segment exhibited a consistent upward trajectory in revenues from 2012 through 2016, growing from US$ 1,284 million to US$ 2,038 million. However, this growth in top-line performance did not result in a linear increase in profitability, as evidenced by the fluctuations in Adjusted EBITDAX and segment profit margins.
- Revenue and Adjusted EBITDAX Trends
- Revenues grew steadily each year of the analyzed period. Adjusted EBITDAX followed a general growth pattern from 2012 to 2015, rising from US$ 474 million to a peak of US$ 1,056 million. A notable divergence occurred in 2016, where revenues continued to rise to US$ 2,038 million, yet Adjusted EBITDAX declined to US$ 797 million, indicating a contraction in operational profitability despite increased scale.
- Segment Profit Margin Analysis
- The segment profit margin remained relatively stable between 34.05% and 36.92% from 2012 to 2014. A significant spike occurred in 2015, with the margin reaching 54.60%, the highest point in the five-year period. This suggests a period of exceptional operational efficiency or a favorable shift in the cost-to-revenue ratio. This peak was short-lived, as the margin corrected sharply to 39.11% in 2016.
- Operational Correlation
- The data indicates that while the Midstream segment successfully expanded its revenue base, the ability to convert those revenues into Adjusted EBITDAX was volatile. The 2015 performance represents an outlier of high profitability, while the 2016 results demonstrate a decoupling of revenue growth and earnings, as profit margins returned to levels more closely aligned with the 2012-2014 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Profit Margin: Marketing
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDAX | (156) | (195) | (219) | (125) | (104) |
| Revenues | 527) | 549) | 517) | 531) | 496) |
| Segment Profitability Ratio | |||||
| Segment profit margin1 | -29.60% | -35.52% | -42.36% | -23.54% | -20.97% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Adjusted EBITDAX ÷ Revenues
= 100 × -156 ÷ 527 = -29.60%
The Marketing segment exhibited consistent operational losses from 2012 through 2016, characterized by negative Adjusted EBITDAX and negative profit margins. While revenues remained relatively stable during this period, the segment experienced significant volatility in profitability, reaching a performance trough in 2014 before entering a gradual recovery phase.
- Revenue Trends
- Annual revenues fluctuated within a narrow range, starting at 496 million USD in 2012 and ending at 527 million USD in 2016. The highest revenue level was recorded in 2015 at 549 million USD, indicating a lack of significant long-term growth or contraction in top-line performance.
- Operational Performance (Adjusted EBITDAX)
- Adjusted EBITDAX remained negative throughout the five-year period, signaling that the segment failed to generate positive cash flow from its primary operations. Losses widened from 104 million USD in 2012 to a peak deficit of 219 million USD in 2014, before narrowing to 156 million USD by the end of 2016.
- Segment Profit Margin Analysis
- The segment profit margin mirrored the trend of Adjusted EBITDAX, showing a sharp deterioration from -20.97% in 2012 to a low of -42.36% in 2014. This represents a significant increase in the cost of operations relative to revenue. However, a recovery trend is observed post-2014, with margins improving to -35.52% in 2015 and -29.60% in 2016.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Return on Assets (Segment ROA)
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas exploration and production | 14.86% | 17.31% | 38.22% | 27.65% | 26.61% |
| Midstream | 13.48% | 17.97% | 9.86% | 9.39% | 10.63% |
| Marketing | — | — | — | -1,388.89% | -110.64% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
Analysis of segment returns on assets reveals a distinct divergence in performance between core exploration activities and midstream operations, alongside a cessation of reporting for marketing activities.
- Oil and gas exploration and production
- This segment exhibited significant volatility, with ROA increasing from 26.61% in 2012 to a peak of 38.22% in 2014. Following this peak, a sharp downward trend occurred, with returns falling to 17.31% in 2015 and further declining to 14.86% by the end of 2016. This represents a substantial contraction in asset efficiency over the final two years of the observation period.
- Midstream
- The midstream segment demonstrated relative stability between 2012 and 2014, with returns fluctuating minimally between 9.39% and 10.63%. A notable increase in performance was observed in 2015, where ROA rose to 17.97%, before moderating to 13.48% in 2016. Compared to the exploration and production segment, the midstream arm showed a more resilient and less volatile return profile.
- Marketing
- Extreme negative returns were recorded for the marketing segment, with ROA shifting from -110.64% in 2012 to -1,388.89% in 2013. The absence of values for this segment from 2014 through 2016 suggests a discontinuation of these activities or a change in reporting structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment ROA: Oil and gas exploration and production
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDAX | 3,604) | 4,456) | 12,505) | 9,238) | 8,500) |
| Net properties and equipment | 24,251) | 25,742) | 32,717) | 33,409) | 31,939) |
| Segment Profitability Ratio | |||||
| Segment ROA1 | 14.86% | 17.31% | 38.22% | 27.65% | 26.61% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Adjusted EBITDAX ÷ Net properties and equipment
= 100 × 3,604 ÷ 24,251 = 14.86%
The oil and gas exploration and production segment experienced a period of growth and peak operational efficiency between 2012 and 2014, followed by a severe contraction in both earnings and asset valuation during 2015 and 2016.
- Adjusted EBITDAX Trends
- A strong upward trajectory was observed from 2012 to 2014, with Adjusted EBITDAX rising from $8,500 million to a peak of $12,505 million. This growth was abruptly reversed in 2015, as earnings collapsed to $4,456 million, continuing a downward trend to reach $3,604 million by the end of 2016.
- Net Properties and Equipment Evolution
- The asset base showed relative stability and slight growth in the early part of the period, peaking at $33,409 million in 2013. A significant reduction occurred in 2015, where net properties and equipment dropped to $25,742 million, and further declined to $24,251 million in 2016, indicating substantial asset write-downs or divestitures.
- Segment Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- Segment ROA increased steadily from 26.61% in 2012 to a maximum of 38.22% in 2014, reflecting high capital efficiency during that period. However, the ratio declined sharply to 17.31% in 2015 and further to 14.86% in 2016. This deterioration demonstrates that the decline in operational earnings far outpaced the reduction in the asset base, leading to a significant erosion of profitability relative to invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment ROA: Midstream
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDAX | 797) | 1,056) | 660) | 508) | 474) |
| Net properties and equipment | 5,913) | 5,876) | 6,697) | 5,408) | 4,459) |
| Segment Profitability Ratio | |||||
| Segment ROA1 | 13.48% | 17.97% | 9.86% | 9.39% | 10.63% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Adjusted EBITDAX ÷ Net properties and equipment
= 100 × 797 ÷ 5,913 = 13.48%
The Midstream segment demonstrated a period of expansion followed by a significant spike in capital efficiency and a subsequent correction between 2012 and 2016. Analysis indicates that profitability grew substantially while the asset base peaked mid-period, leading to a notable volatility in the return on assets.
- Adjusted EBITDAX Trends
- Earnings exhibited a consistent upward trajectory from 2012 to 2015, rising from US$ 474 million to a peak of US$ 1,056 million. This represents a substantial increase in operational cash flow over the four-year span. However, this trend reversed in 2016, with Adjusted EBITDAX declining to US$ 797 million.
- Asset Base Evolution
- Net properties and equipment grew steadily from 2012 to 2014, increasing from US$ 4,459 million to a peak of US$ 6,697 million. A reduction in the asset base was observed in 2015, with values dropping to US$ 5,876 million, and remaining relatively stable through 2016 at US$ 5,913 million.
- Segment ROA Analysis
- The Segment ROA remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2014, fluctuating between 9.39% and 10.63%. A sharp increase to 17.97% occurred in 2015, driven by the simultaneous peak in Adjusted EBITDAX and a reduction in net properties and equipment. In 2016, the ROA moderated to 13.48%, reflecting the decline in earnings despite a nearly flat asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment ROA: Marketing
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDAX | (156) | (195) | (219) | (125) | (104) |
| Net properties and equipment | —) | —) | —) | 9) | 94) |
| Segment Profitability Ratio | |||||
| Segment ROA1 | — | — | — | -1,388.89% | -110.64% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Adjusted EBITDAX ÷ Net properties and equipment
= 100 × -156 ÷ 0 = —
The Marketing segment exhibits a consistent pattern of operational losses and severe volatility in return metrics between 2012 and 2016.
- Adjusted EBITDAX Performance
- Operational profitability remained negative throughout the entire analyzed period. A downward trend in earnings is observed from 2012 to 2014, with losses widening from -104 million US dollars to a peak deficit of -219 million US dollars. Following 2014, a moderate recovery trend occurred, as losses narrowed to -195 million US dollars in 2015 and -156 million US dollars by the end of 2016.
- Asset Base and Segment ROA
- A significant contraction in the asset base is evident, with net properties and equipment falling from 94 million US dollars in 2012 to 9 million US dollars in 2013. This sharp reduction in assets, occurring simultaneously with increasing operational losses, led to a precipitous decline in Segment ROA, which shifted from -110.64% in 2012 to -1,388.89% in 2013.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Asset Turnover
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas exploration and production | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.38 |
| Midstream | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| Marketing | — | — | — | 59.00 | 5.28 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The asset turnover ratios across the reportable segments exhibit divergent trends between 2012 and 2016, reflecting varying levels of asset utilization efficiency and operational shifts within the business units.
- Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
- An initial upward trend is observed from 2012 to 2014, with the ratio increasing from 0.38 to a peak of 0.45. However, this is followed by a significant decline in subsequent years, falling to 0.31 in 2015 and further to 0.28 by 2016. This contraction suggests a decrease in the revenue generated per unit of asset employed during the latter part of the period.
- Midstream
- This segment maintained a relatively stable but low turnover ratio between 2012 and 2014, fluctuating slightly between 0.29 and 0.27. A reversal in trend occurred starting in 2015, with the ratio improving to 0.33 and continuing to rise to 0.34 in 2016, indicating a gradual increase in asset efficiency.
- Marketing
- A substantial increase in asset turnover is noted between 2012 and 2013, where the ratio surged from 5.28 to 59.00. This high ratio is characteristic of marketing operations, which typically require fewer capital assets to generate revenue. No values are reported for this segment from 2014 through 2016.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Asset Turnover: Oil and gas exploration and production
Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; Oil and gas exploration and production; segment asset turnover calculation
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Revenues | 6,842) | 7,912) | 14,828) | 13,495) | 12,070) |
| Net properties and equipment | 24,251) | 25,742) | 32,717) | 33,409) | 31,939) |
| Segment Activity Ratio | |||||
| Segment asset turnover1 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.38 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Net properties and equipment
= 6,842 ÷ 24,251 = 0.28
The financial performance of the oil and gas exploration and production segment between 2012 and 2016 is characterized by an initial period of growth and efficiency gains followed by a significant contraction in both revenue and asset utilization.
- Revenue Trends
- Revenues experienced steady growth from 2012 to 2014, peaking at 14,828 million US dollars. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2015, with revenues dropping to 7,912 million US dollars, and continuing to decrease to 6,842 million US dollars by the end of 2016. This represents a substantial contraction in top-line performance in the latter half of the analyzed period.
- Net Properties and Equipment
- Capital assets increased from 31,939 million US dollars in 2012 to a peak of 33,409 million US dollars in 2013. A downward trend followed, with net properties and equipment reducing to 24,251 million US dollars by 2016. While assets were reduced during the period of revenue decline, the reduction in the asset base was not sufficient to stabilize the efficiency ratios.
- Segment Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratio improved from 0.38 in 2012 to a peak of 0.45 in 2014, indicating an increase in the efficiency of generating revenue from the asset base. This trend reversed sharply in 2015, falling to 0.31, and further declined to 0.28 in 2016. The deterioration of this ratio highlights a significant decrease in the segment's ability to generate revenue relative to its investment in properties and equipment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Asset Turnover: Midstream
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Revenues | 2,038) | 1,934) | 1,822) | 1,492) | 1,284) |
| Net properties and equipment | 5,913) | 5,876) | 6,697) | 5,408) | 4,459) |
| Segment Activity Ratio | |||||
| Segment asset turnover1 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Net properties and equipment
= 2,038 ÷ 5,913 = 0.34
The Midstream segment demonstrated consistent revenue growth over the five-year period from 2012 to 2016, while asset utilization efficiency fluctuated before showing a marked improvement in the final two years.
- Revenue Growth Trends
- Revenues exhibited a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 1,284 million US dollars in 2012 to 2,038 million US dollars in 2016. This consistent growth indicates a sustained expansion in the segment's operational scale or pricing power over the analyzed period.
- Net Properties and Equipment Dynamics
- The asset base grew significantly from 2012 to 2014, peaking at 6,697 million US dollars. Following this peak, a contraction was observed in 2015, with the value decreasing to 5,876 million US dollars and remaining relatively stable at 5,913 million US dollars by the end of 2016.
- Segment Asset Turnover Performance
- The asset turnover ratio experienced a slight decline during the first three years, moving from 0.29 in 2012 to 0.27 in 2014, which suggests that the growth in net properties and equipment outpaced the growth in revenue during the initial expansion phase. However, a positive trend emerged in 2015 and 2016, with the ratio rising to 0.33 and 0.34, respectively. This increase indicates a more efficient use of assets to generate revenue, driven by the combination of continuing revenue growth and a reduced asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Segment Asset Turnover: Marketing
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||
| Revenues | 527) | 549) | 517) | 531) | 496) |
| Net properties and equipment | —) | —) | —) | 9) | 94) |
| Segment Activity Ratio | |||||
| Segment asset turnover1 | — | — | — | 59.00 | 5.28 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Net properties and equipment
= 527 ÷ 0 = —
The Marketing segment exhibited relative stability in revenue generation between 2012 and 2016. Revenues fluctuated within a narrow range, starting at 496 million US dollars in 2012 and reaching a peak of 549 million US dollars in 2015, before slightly declining to 527 million US dollars by the end of 2016.
- Segment Asset Turnover Analysis
- A substantial increase in the segment asset turnover ratio occurred between 2012 and 2013, rising from 5.28 to 59.00. This exponential growth indicates a dramatic shift in the relationship between generated revenue and the asset base employed by the segment.
- Asset Base Contraction
- The surge in asset turnover is directly attributable to a sharp decline in net properties and equipment, which fell from 94 million US dollars in 2012 to 9 million US dollars in 2013. Because revenues increased slightly during this same interval, the reduction in the asset denominator resulted in a disproportionately high turnover ratio.
- Operational Efficiency and Asset Management
- The disparity between the stable revenue trend and the volatile asset base suggests that the segment significantly reduced its physical capital requirements or underwent an asset reclassification during 2013. The resulting turnover ratio of 59.00 reflects a lean asset structure relative to the volume of revenue processed by the Marketing segment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Revenues
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas exploration and production | 6,842) | 7,912) | 14,828) | 13,495) | 12,070) |
| Midstream | 2,038) | 1,934) | 1,822) | 1,492) | 1,284) |
| Marketing | 527) | 549) | 517) | 531) | 496) |
| Other and intersegment eliminations | (960) | (909) | (792) | (651) | (543) |
| Total | 8,447) | 9,486) | 16,375) | 14,867) | 13,307) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
Total consolidated revenues grew steadily between 2012 and 2014, reaching a peak of US$ 16,375 million, before experiencing a sharp contraction in 2015 and 2016. The overall revenue trajectory was heavily influenced by the performance of the exploration and production segment, which experienced significant volatility during the observed period.
- Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
- This segment served as the dominant revenue driver but displayed extreme variance. After an upward trend from US$ 12,070 million in 2012 to US$ 14,828 million in 2014, the segment suffered a precipitous decline. Revenues fell to US$ 7,912 million in 2015 and further decreased to US$ 6,842 million by the end of 2016.
- Midstream Segment
- Midstream revenues exhibited a consistent and linear growth pattern, contrasting with the volatility of the production segment. Revenues increased every year from US$ 1,284 million in 2012 to US$ 2,038 million in 2016, demonstrating a steady expansion of this business line regardless of broader market volatility.
- Marketing and Intersegment Eliminations
- Marketing revenues remained stable with minimal fluctuation, ranging between US$ 496 million and US$ 549 million over the five-year period. Meanwhile, other and intersegment eliminations increased steadily in magnitude, moving from US$ -543 million in 2012 to US$ -960 million in 2016, thereby increasing the total offset applied to the consolidated revenue.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted EBITDAX
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas exploration and production | 3,604) | 4,456) | 12,505) | 9,238) | 8,500) |
| Midstream | 797) | 1,056) | 660) | 508) | 474) |
| Marketing | (156) | (195) | (219) | (125) | (104) |
| Other and intersegment eliminations | (170) | (381) | (225) | (218) | 96) |
| Total | 4,075) | 4,936) | 12,721) | 9,403) | 8,966) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
Total Adjusted EBITDAX exhibited a growth trajectory from 2012 through 2014, followed by a severe contraction in 2015 and 2016. The aggregate performance was heavily influenced by the volatility of the exploration and production segment, which serves as the primary driver of the company's earnings.
- Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
- This segment experienced significant growth in the early part of the period, rising from 8,500 million in 2012 to a peak of 12,505 million in 2014. A sharp downturn occurred in 2015, with values dropping to 4,456 million, and a further decline to 3,604 million in 2016. This represent a substantial reduction in earnings power from the 2014 peak.
- Midstream Operations
- The midstream segment demonstrated a consistent upward trend from 2012 to 2015, increasing from 474 million to a peak of 1,056 million. Although a decline to 797 million was observed in 2016, the segment remained more resilient than the exploration and production arm throughout the analyzed period.
- Marketing and Intersegment Eliminations
- The marketing segment operated at a loss for all five years, with the deficit deepening to 219 million in 2014 before moderating to 156 million by 2016. Other and intersegment eliminations transitioned from a positive 96 million in 2012 to a consistent negative trend, peaking at a loss of 381 million in 2015.
- Total Adjusted EBITDAX Trend
- The total Adjusted EBITDAX rose from 8,966 million in 2012 to a high of 12,721 million in 2014. This was followed by a precipitous decline to 4,936 million in 2015 and a further decrease to 4,075 million in 2016, indicating a significant erosion of total operational profitability over the final two years of the reporting period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Net properties and equipment
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas exploration and production | 24,251) | 25,742) | 32,717) | 33,409) | 31,939) |
| Midstream | 5,913) | 5,876) | 6,697) | 5,408) | 4,459) |
| Marketing | —) | —) | —) | 9) | 94) |
| Other and intersegment eliminations | 2,004) | 2,133) | 2,175) | 2,103) | 1,906) |
| Total | 32,168) | 33,751) | 41,589) | 40,929) | 38,398) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The total net properties and equipment experienced an initial growth phase, peaking in 2014 before entering a period of significant contraction. Between December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2014, total assets increased from US$ 38,398 million to US$ 41,589 million, followed by a substantial decline to US$ 32,168 million by December 31, 2016.
- Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
- As the primary driver of the asset base, this segment showed growth from US$ 31,939 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 33,409 million in 2013. A sharp downward trend emerged starting in 2015, with the asset value dropping to US$ 25,742 million, and further declining to US$ 24,251 million by the end of 2016.
- Midstream Assets
- The midstream segment demonstrated consistent growth during the first three years of the period, rising from US$ 4,459 million in 2012 to US$ 6,697 million in 2014. This was followed by a decrease to US$ 5,876 million in 2015, with values remaining relatively stable at US$ 5,913 million in 2016.
- Marketing Segment
- A near-total elimination of assets is observed in the marketing segment, which decreased from US$ 94 million in 2012 to US$ 9 million in 2013, with no values reported for the remainder of the period.
- Other and Intersegment Eliminations
- This category remained the most stable component of the report, fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 1,906 million in 2012 and a peak of US$ 2,175 million in 2014, before settling at US$ 2,004 million in 2016.
The overall trajectory of the asset base indicates a strategic or market-driven contraction following 2014. The significant reduction in exploration and production assets was the primary contributor to the overall decline in total net properties and equipment, which ended the period approximately 16% lower than the initial 2012 valuation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?