- Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Fidelity National Information Services Inc., balance sheet: goodwill and intangible assets
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The total value of goodwill, intangible assets, and software experienced a dramatic increase between 2018 and 2019, rising from 18,472 million USD to 71,244 million USD. This peak was maintained with relative stability through 2021 before a significant contraction occurred in 2022, where the total decreased to 46,470 million USD. This trajectory suggests a period of aggressive expansion via acquisition followed by a subsequent reduction in asset carrying values.
- Goodwill Trends
- Goodwill exhibited the most volatility within the asset group. A substantial surge is noted from 2018 to 2019, increasing from 13,545 million USD to 52,242 million USD, indicating a major acquisition event. After remaining stable near 53,300 million USD through 2021, goodwill declined sharply to 34,276 million USD by December 31, 2022, suggesting either a strategic divestiture or an impairment charge.
- Intangible Assets and Amortization
- Customer relationships represented the primary component of intangible assets, peaking in 2020 at 18,586 million USD before a gradual decline. While the cost of intangible assets remained relatively stable between 2019 and 2022, the net book value decreased consistently from 15,798 million USD in 2019 to 8,956 million USD in 2022. This decline is directly attributable to the steady rise in accumulated amortization, which grew from -2,990 million USD in 2018 to -9,304 million USD in 2022.
- Software Asset Analysis
- Net software assets remained more stable than goodwill, fluctuating between 3.2 billion and 3.4 billion USD from 2019 to 2022. A notable trend is the consistent growth in capitalized software development costs, which rose every year from 1,624 million USD in 2018 to 3,766 million USD in 2022. This indicates a sustained internal investment in proprietary technology and platform enhancement, contrasting with the acquisition-driven nature of the goodwill and customer relationship assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Fidelity National Information Services Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
An analysis of the financial results between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant divergence between reported figures and adjusted figures, primarily driven by the removal of goodwill and intangible assets. The disparity indicates that a substantial portion of the balance sheet is comprised of non-tangible assets, which materially alters the perception of the company's financial solvency and operational performance.
- Asset Composition and Tangibility
- Reported total assets experienced a sharp increase from 23,770 million USD in 2018 to a peak of 83,842 million USD in 2020, before declining to 63,278 million USD by 2022. In contrast, adjusted total assets remained significantly lower and more stable, peaking at 31,564 million USD in 2019 and gradually declining to 29,002 million USD in 2022. This gap suggests that for the majority of the period, more than 60% of the reported assets consisted of goodwill and intangible assets.
- Tangible Equity Position
- The reported stockholders' equity mirrors the trend of reported assets, peaking in 2019 at 49,440 million USD before falling to 27,218 million USD in 2022. However, the adjusted stockholders' equity remained consistently negative throughout the entire five-year period. The adjusted equity moved from -3,330 million USD in 2018 to -7,058 million USD in 2022. This indicates a negative tangible net worth, meaning the company's tangible assets are insufficient to cover its total liabilities.
- Earnings Volatility and Impairment
- Net earnings attributable to common stockholders remained relatively stable and positive between 2018 and 2021. However, 2022 shows a drastic divergence: reported net earnings plummeted to a loss of 16,720 million USD, while adjusted net earnings remained positive at 868 million USD. This discrepancy points to a massive non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill or intangible assets in 2022, which severely impacted reported bottom-line results without affecting the adjusted operational earnings.
The overall trend demonstrates a high reliance on intangible valuations to maintain a positive reported equity position. The sharp decline in reported assets and equity in 2022, coupled with the massive reported loss that is absent in the adjusted earnings, confirms a significant write-down of intangible assets during that fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Fidelity National Information Services Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance of the entity exhibits a significant divergence between reported and adjusted metrics, primarily driven by the presence of goodwill and intangible assets. This divergence becomes most acute in 2022, where non-cash adjustments reveal a stark contrast between statutory reporting and underlying operational performance.
- Net Profit Margin Analysis
- A severe contraction in the reported net profit margin is observed, culminating in a value of -115.09% in 2022. In contrast, the adjusted net profit margin for the same period remained positive at 5.97%. This discrepancy indicates that the reported loss was driven by significant non-cash charges, likely related to the impairment of goodwill or intangible assets, rather than a failure of core operational profitability.
- Asset Utilization and Turnover
- The adjusted total asset turnover is consistently and substantially higher than the reported turnover across the entire five-year period. While the reported turnover reached 0.23 in 2022, the adjusted figure was more than double at 0.50. This pattern demonstrates that a large portion of the total asset base consists of non-productive intangible assets that inflate the denominator of the ratio, thereby suppressing the reported efficiency of asset usage.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The reported ROA shows a drastic decline, reaching -26.42% by 2022. However, the adjusted ROA, which excludes the impact of goodwill, provides a different trajectory, ending the period at 2.99%. The gap between these two figures highlights how the inflation of the balance sheet through acquisitions masks the actual return generated by the tangible operating assets.
- Financial Leverage and Equity Returns
- Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable between 1.70 and 2.33 over the period. The reported Return on Equity (ROE) mirrored the trend of the net profit margin, collapsing to -61.43% in 2022, further emphasizing the impact of the 2022 impairment charges on shareholder equity returns.
Overall, the removal of goodwill provides a more favorable view of operational efficiency and profitability. The data suggests that while the reported figures indicate a crisis in 2022, the adjusted metrics reveal a stable, albeit low, operational profitability and an improvement in asset efficiency over the 2019-2022 window.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net earnings (loss) attributable to FIS common stockholders ÷ Revenue
= 100 × -16,720 ÷ 14,528 = -115.09%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net earnings (loss) attributable to FIS common stockholders ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 868 ÷ 14,528 = 5.97%
An analysis of the financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted profitability metrics, particularly in the final year of the period. While reported figures show extreme volatility and a substantial collapse in 2022, the adjusted metrics suggest a more stable underlying operational trend with a recovery phase following a mid-period decline.
- Reported Net Profit Margin
- A precipitous decline is observed in reported margins over the five-year period. The margin started at 10.04% in 2018, decreased steadily to 1.26% by 2020, and experienced a slight recovery to 3.00% in 2021. However, 2022 saw a catastrophic shift to -115.09%, corresponding with a reported net loss of 16,720 million US dollars.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- The adjusted net profit margin follows a V-shaped trajectory. After falling from 10.04% in 2018 to a low of 1.26% in 2020, the margin trended upward, reaching 3.00% in 2021 and further improving to 5.97% in 2022. This indicates that when non-recurring items are excluded, the core profitability of the entity improved in the latter two years of the analysis.
- Analysis of Profitability Divergence
- Between 2018 and 2021, reported and adjusted earnings were identical, indicating an absence of significant non-recurring adjustments during that timeframe. A stark decoupling occurred in 2022, where the difference between reported net earnings (-16,720 million US dollars) and adjusted net earnings (868 million US dollars) exceeds 17.5 billion US dollars. This disparity strongly suggests the recognition of a massive one-time non-cash charge, typically associated with the impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 14,528 ÷ 63,278 = 0.23
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 14,528 ÷ 29,002 = 0.50
An analysis of the balance sheet reveals a substantial expansion in the asset base between 2018 and 2019. Reported total assets increased from 23,770 million US$ to 83,806 million US$, while adjusted total assets rose from 10,225 million US$ to 31,564 million US$. The significant divergence between these two figures indicates a heavy concentration of goodwill and intangible assets introduced during the 2019 period, which remained a dominant feature of the reported asset structure through 2021.
- Reported Total Asset Turnover
- A sharp contraction in efficiency is observed in 2019, where the ratio dropped from 0.35 to 0.12. This decline corresponds with the rapid inflation of reported assets. However, a steady recovery trend followed, with the ratio increasing annually from 2020 to 2022, eventually reaching 0.23. This suggests that while the initial asset expansion diluted turnover, the organization gradually improved its ability to generate revenue from its total reported asset base.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- The adjusted ratio, which removes the impact of goodwill and intangible assets, shows a more pronounced initial decline from 0.82 in 2018 to 0.33 in 2019. Following this low, a consistent and linear improvement is observed, rising to 0.41 in 2020, 0.47 in 2021, and 0.50 in 2022. This trend indicates an increase in the productivity of the core tangible asset base over the four-year recovery period.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- A consistent gap persists between the reported and adjusted turnover ratios. The adjusted total asset turnover is significantly higher than the reported turnover in every year analyzed. This disparity confirms that the presence of intangible assets creates a substantial drag on reported asset efficiency. The fact that adjusted turnover improved more steadily than reported turnover suggests that the operational gains were driven primarily by better utilization of tangible assets rather than a reduction in the intangible asset burden.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total FIS stockholders’ equity
= 63,278 ÷ 27,218 = 2.32
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total FIS stockholders’ equity
= 29,002 ÷ -7,058 = —
A significant divergence exists between reported and adjusted financial metrics from 2018 to 2022, primarily driven by the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets. While reported total assets peaked in 2020 at 83,842 million US dollars, adjusted total assets remained substantially lower, peaking in 2019 at 31,564 million US dollars and declining slightly to 29,002 million US dollars by 2022. This gap indicates that a substantial portion of the asset base is comprised of non-tangible elements.
- Equity Composition and Adjusted Equity Trends
- A critical disparity is observed in the equity accounts. Reported stockholders' equity showed a sharp increase between 2018 and 2019, rising from 10,215 million US dollars to 49,440 million US dollars, before contracting to 27,218 million US dollars by 2022. Conversely, adjusted stockholders' equity remained negative throughout the entire period. This negative adjusted equity trend worsened over time, moving from -3,330 million US dollars in 2018 to -7,058 million US dollars in 2022, suggesting that the company's tangible assets are insufficient to cover its total liabilities.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a low of 1.70 in 2019 and 2020 and a high of 2.33 in 2018 and 2.32 in 2022. However, the negative values in adjusted stockholders' equity render the adjusted financial leverage ratio fundamentally different from the reported ratio. The shift toward increasingly negative adjusted equity implies that the reported leverage ratios are heavily supported by the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets rather than tangible capital.
- Asset and Equity Correlation
- The correlation between reported assets and reported equity mirrors the impact of significant acquisitions or accounting adjustments seen in 2019. However, the adjusted metrics reveal a different underlying fiscal reality where both adjusted assets and adjusted equity trended downward or remained negative in the latter years of the period. The contraction in reported total assets from 82,931 million US dollars in 2021 to 63,278 million US dollars in 2022 corresponds with a sharp decrease in reported equity, yet adjusted assets remained relatively stable, indicating the reduction was concentrated in the intangible asset category.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net earnings (loss) attributable to FIS common stockholders ÷ Total FIS stockholders’ equity
= 100 × -16,720 ÷ 27,218 = -61.43%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net earnings (loss) attributable to FIS common stockholders ÷ Adjusted total FIS stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 868 ÷ -7,058 = —
A significant divergence between reported and adjusted financial metrics is observed between 2018 and 2022, specifically regarding net earnings and the composition of stockholders' equity.
- Net Earnings Trends
- Reported net earnings exhibited extreme volatility, characterized by a decline from 846 million US dollars in 2018 to a substantial loss of 16.72 billion US dollars in 2022. In contrast, adjusted net earnings remained positive throughout the period, showing a recovery trend between 2020 and 2022 to reach 868 million US dollars. The stark contrast in 2022 indicates a massive non-cash or non-recurring charge affecting the reported figures that was excluded from the adjusted performance metrics.
- Stockholders' Equity Analysis
- A critical disparity exists between reported and adjusted equity. Reported stockholders' equity increased sharply in 2019 to 49.44 billion US dollars before declining to 27.22 billion US dollars by 2022. However, adjusted stockholders' equity remained consistently negative over the entire five-year period, trending further downward from -3.33 billion US dollars in 2018 to -7.06 billion US dollars in 2022. This pattern reveals that the reported equity is heavily inflated by intangible assets and goodwill; once these are removed, the equity position is negative.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Interpretation
- Reported ROE experienced a precipitous decline, falling from 8.28% in 2018 to -61.43% in 2022, mirroring the reported net loss. While adjusted net earnings remained positive, the consistently negative adjusted equity implies that the adjusted ROE would also be negative. This indicates that the company is operating with a negative tangible book value, where the earnings are being generated against a deficit of adjusted equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net earnings (loss) attributable to FIS common stockholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -16,720 ÷ 63,278 = -26.42%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net earnings (loss) attributable to FIS common stockholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 868 ÷ 29,002 = 2.99%
An analysis of the financial metrics between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted figures, primarily driven by the impact of non-cash adjustments and asset valuations. A substantial expansion of the asset base occurred in 2019, which remained a dominant feature of the balance sheet until a notable reduction in 2022.
- Earnings Divergence
- Reported net earnings exhibited extreme volatility, culminating in a substantial loss of 16,720 million in 2022. Conversely, adjusted net earnings remained positive throughout the five-year period, recovering to 868 million by 2022. This disparity indicates that the reported losses were primarily the result of significant non-operational charges rather than a failure of core profitability.
- Asset Composition and Intangibles
- A consistent and wide gap is observed between reported total assets and adjusted total assets. For example, in 2021, reported assets stood at 82,931 million while adjusted assets were only 29,601 million. This suggests that a large majority of the company's balance sheet is comprised of goodwill and intangible assets. The sharp decrease in reported assets in 2022, coinciding with a massive reported loss, suggests a significant write-down of these intangible assets.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- The Adjusted ROA provides a more stable view of operational efficiency by removing the distortions of goodwill and one-time charges. While there was a sharp decline from 8.27% in 2018 to a low of 0.52% in 2020, a steady recovery trend is observed thereafter, with the ratio increasing to 1.41% in 2021 and 2.99% in 2022. This upward trajectory indicates an improving return on the company's tangible and core operational assets despite the volatility seen in reported figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?