Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance from 2018 to 2021 was characterized by steady operational growth, which was abruptly reversed by a severe contraction in 2022. While operational cash flow proxies showed strength for several years, bottom-line profitability remained volatile and eventually collapsed into a significant deficit.
- EBITDA Growth and Reversal
- A consistent upward trajectory in EBITDA was observed between 2018 and 2021, increasing from US$ 2,823 million to a peak of US$ 5,026 million. This growth suggests a period of expanding operational scale or improving margins. However, this trend was completely erased in 2022, when EBITDA plummeted to negative US$ 12,185 million, representing a drastic shift in operational viability or the recognition of massive non-cash charges.
- Net Earnings Volatility
- Net earnings attributable to common stockholders did not mirror the steady growth of EBITDA during the 2018-2021 period. After a high of US$ 846 million in 2018, net earnings declined and fluctuated, reaching a low of US$ 158 million in 2020 before recovering slightly to US$ 417 million in 2021. This divergence indicates that while operational earnings were rising, other factors—such as interest expenses, taxes, or depreciation—placed significant pressure on final profitability.
- Analysis of the 2022 Fiscal Collapse
- The 2022 fiscal year exhibits an extraordinary negative shift across all measured metrics. The transition from a positive EBIT of US$ 1,011 million in 2021 to negative US$ 16,031 million in 2022, coinciding with a net loss of US$ 16,720 million, suggests the occurrence of a monumental financial event. The scale of these losses, particularly the gap between EBITDA and EBIT, implies significant non-operating losses or substantial asset impairments that overwhelmed all operational gains.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
Fidelity National Information Services Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 49,433) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | (12,185) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | — |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Accenture PLC | 8.47 |
| Adobe Inc. | 9.44 |
| AppLovin Corp. | 24.28 |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 47.15 |
| Datadog Inc. | 457.92 |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 15.07 |
| Intuit Inc. | 10.47 |
| Microsoft Corp. | 17.96 |
| Oracle Corp. | 15.82 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | 270.70 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 228.37 |
| Salesforce Inc. | 14.95 |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 45.56 |
| Synopsys Inc. | 36.78 |
| Workday Inc. | 29.64 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Software & Services | 40.92 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Information Technology | 54.65 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
Fidelity National Information Services Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 56,149) | 74,589) | 101,462) | 115,683) | 42,880) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | (12,185) | 5,026) | 4,313) | 3,236) | 2,823) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | — | 14.84 | 23.52 | 35.75 | 15.19 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | 14.25 | 23.31 | 17.46 | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | 22.32 | 35.44 | 43.06 | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | 14.17 | 30.05 | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 42.11 | 39.61 | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | 1,785.61 | 1,949.67 | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 22.17 | 12.53 | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | 36.22 | 51.96 | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 20.17 | 24.59 | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | 17.12 | 13.78 | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 515.19 | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | 38.88 | 33.83 | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 104.31 | 147.45 | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | 36.73 | 53.43 | 42.24 | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | 147.90 | 670.04 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | 22.39 | 25.74 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 18.32 | 20.52 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 56,149 ÷ -12,185 = —
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by significant volatility in valuation and a severe operational reversal in the final period.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- A substantial expansion in Enterprise Value occurred between 2018 and 2019, with the figure rising from 42,880 million to a peak of 115,683 million. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend was observed, as the value declined steadily over the next three years to reach 56,149 million by December 31, 2022.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings showed a consistent upward trajectory from 2018 through 2021, growing from 2,823 million to 5,026 million. This period of steady growth was abruptly interrupted in 2022, when EBITDA shifted to a significant negative value of 12,185 million.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The valuation multiple experienced a sharp spike in 2019, reaching 35.75, which indicates that the increase in Enterprise Value far exceeded the growth in earnings during that year. Between 2020 and 2021, the ratio contracted to 23.52 and then to 14.84, suggesting a normalization of the valuation relative to EBITDA. The ratio for 2022 is absent, as the negative EBITDA figure renders the traditional multiple inapplicable.
AI Ask an analyst for more