Stock Analysis on Net

YUM! Brands Inc. (NYSE:YUM)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 11, 2016.

Analysis of Liquidity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Liquidity Ratios (Summary)

YUM! Brands Inc., liquidity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Current ratio
Quick ratio
Cash ratio

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Current Ratio
The current ratio demonstrates a consistent downward trend over the observed five-year period, decreasing from 0.95 in 2011 to 0.55 in 2015. This steady decline suggests a reduction in the company's short-term liquidity position, indicating a shrinking buffer between current assets and current liabilities.
Quick Ratio
The quick ratio also follows a significant downward trajectory, falling from 0.61 in 2011 to 0.36 in 2015. The more pronounced decline compared to the current ratio indicates a relatively larger decrease in liquid assets excluding inventory. This suggests the company might be experiencing a tightening in readily available liquid resources.
Cash Ratio
The cash ratio decreases from 0.49 in 2011 to 0.24 in 2015, showing a halving of the company's immediate cash resources relative to current liabilities. The relatively stable figures between 2014 and 2015 imply that the cash reserves remained flat at a low level towards the end of the period.
Overall Insight
Collectively, the liquidity ratios indicate a declining trend in the company's capacity to meet short-term obligations using its available assets. Both the current and quick ratios suggest increasing pressure on liquidity, while the declining cash ratio points to reduced immediate cash availability. This could signal a need for management to examine working capital management and possibly improve liquidity to mitigate financial risk.

Current Ratio

YUM! Brands Inc., current ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets
Current liabilities
Liquidity Ratio
Current ratio1
Benchmarks
Current Ratio, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Current Assets
The current assets showed a consistent decline from 2011 to 2014, decreasing from 2321 million US dollars to 1646 million US dollars. In 2015, there was a slight increase to 1688 million US dollars, but the overall trend over the five-year period was downward.
Current Liabilities
Current liabilities initially decreased from 2450 million US dollars in 2011 to 2188 million US dollars in 2012. However, from 2013 onwards, liabilities increased progressively each year, reaching 3088 million US dollars in 2015, indicating a growing short-term obligation load.
Current Ratio
The current ratio demonstrated a steady decline over the period, moving from 0.95 in 2011 to 0.55 in 2015. This downward trend indicates a weakening short-term liquidity position, as the company's current assets have become increasingly insufficient to cover its current liabilities.

Quick Ratio

YUM! Brands Inc., quick ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts and notes receivable, net
Total quick assets
 
Current liabilities
Liquidity Ratio
Quick ratio1
Benchmarks
Quick Ratio, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Trend in Total Quick Assets
The total quick assets exhibited a declining trend from 2011 through 2014, decreasing from 1,484 million US dollars in 2011 to a low of 892 million US dollars in 2013. In 2014, the quick assets stabilized around 903 million US dollars and showed a moderate recovery in 2015, increasing to 1,114 million US dollars.
Trend in Current Liabilities
Current liabilities decreased initially from 2,450 million US dollars in 2011 to 2,188 million US dollars in 2012. However, from 2012 to 2014, current liabilities gradually increased, reaching 2,411 million US dollars. In 2015, a notable rise occurred with current liabilities climbing to 3,088 million US dollars, representing the highest level in the observed period.
Quick Ratio Analysis
The quick ratio continuously declined throughout the five-year period, dropping from 0.61 in 2011 to 0.36 in 2015. This indicates a deterioration in the company's ability to cover short-term obligations with its most liquid assets over time.
Overall Observations
The combined data suggests tightening liquidity conditions for the company over the five years. Despite a slight increase in quick assets towards the end of the period, the simultaneous and more substantial increase in current liabilities, especially in 2015, contributed to the declining quick ratio. This trend points to potential challenges in short-term financial flexibility and liquidity management.

Cash Ratio

YUM! Brands Inc., cash ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Total cash assets
 
Current liabilities
Liquidity Ratio
Cash ratio1
Benchmarks
Cash Ratio, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Cash Assets
The total cash assets exhibit a declining trend from 2011 through 2013, dropping significantly from 1,198 million USD to 573 million USD. Following this period, there is a slight increase to 578 million USD in 2014 and a further rise to 737 million USD in 2015, indicating some recovery after the initial decrease.
Current Liabilities
Current liabilities decreased from 2,450 million USD in 2011 to 2,188 million USD in 2012, showing an improvement in short-term obligations. However, liabilities then rose slightly to 2,265 million USD in 2013, followed by a further increase to 2,411 million USD in 2014, and a sharper rise to 3,088 million USD in 2015. This suggests an increasing burden of current liabilities over the latter years.
Cash Ratio
The cash ratio steadily declined from 0.49 in 2011 to 0.24 in 2014, and it remained at 0.24 in 2015. This indicates a reduction in liquidity measured by the company's ability to cover current liabilities solely with cash and cash equivalents, suggesting a relatively weaker liquidity position over time.
Overall Insights
There is a clear pattern of declining cash assets and liquidity ratio throughout the period, with current liabilities increasing especially in the final year. The widening gap between cash assets and current liabilities reflects a deteriorating short-term financial position, potentially increasing reliance on other forms of current assets or external financing to meet obligations.