Stock Analysis on Net

YUM! Brands Inc. (NYSE:YUM)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 11, 2016.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

YUM! Brands Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover
Receivables turnover
Payables turnover
Working capital turnover
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period
Add: Average receivable collection period
Operating cycle
Less: Average payables payment period
Cash conversion cycle

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The financial data reveals a number of changes and trends in operational efficiency metrics over the five-year period ending in 2015. Several ratios and period-based measures related to inventory, receivables, payables, and the overall cash conversion cycle are analyzed.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio remained fairly stable from 2011 through 2014, fluctuating slightly between approximately 31 and 33 times per year. However, in 2015, there was a significant increase to 40.87, indicating a much faster rate of inventory movement compared to previous years. This suggests improved inventory management or stronger sales leading to quicker stock turnover.
Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio showed a declining trend over the period. Starting at 38.09 in 2011, it increased slightly to 39.31 in 2012 but then steadily decreased each subsequent year, reaching 29.56 in 2015. This decline suggests that the company was collecting receivables more slowly over time, potentially indicating relaxed credit policies or slower customer payments.
Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio generally increased from 12.84 in 2011 to 15.19 in 2015, with some minor fluctuations during the intervening years. This trend points to a faster payment cycle to suppliers over time, implying that the company chose to settle its obligations more promptly as the years progressed.
Average Inventory Processing Period
This metric stayed steady around 11 to 12 days for four years before dropping to 9 days in 2015. This decrease complements the increase in inventory turnover observed in 2015 and reflects an acceleration in inventory processing efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average period for collecting receivables decreased from 10 days in 2011 to 9 days in 2012, then remained constant at 10 days in 2013 and 2014 before increasing to 12 days in 2015. This later increase corresponds with the decrease in receivables turnover and suggests a slowdown in cash inflows from receivables during the final year.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle was remarkably consistent at 21 days throughout the entire period, indicating the time between inventory acquisition and cash collection from receivables remained stable despite variations in individual components.
Average Payables Payment Period
This measure shows a declining trend from 28 days in 2011 to 24 days in 2015, with minor fluctuations. The shortening period indicates that the company paid its suppliers more quickly over time, in line with the increasing payables turnover.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle was negative throughout the five years, implying the company generally received cash from customers before it had to pay its suppliers. Although it fluctuated slightly—from -7 days in 2011 to -3 days in 2015—the trend indicates a modest weakening of this advantage by 2015.

Overall, the data demonstrates improvements in inventory management with faster turnover and shorter inventory processing times by 2015. However, there is evidence of slower receivables collection, which could affect liquidity. The company consistently accelerated payments to suppliers, reducing the payables period. The negative cash conversion cycle throughout the period reflects efficient working capital management, though the slight increase suggests a cautious observation of cash flow timing is warranted moving forward.


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Company restaurant expenses
Inventories
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Company restaurant expenses ÷ Inventories
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Company Restaurant Expenses
The company restaurant expenses initially increased from 9,140 million US dollars in 2011 to a peak of 9,852 million US dollars in 2012. Following this peak, expenses decreased to 9,501 million in 2013, then slightly increased again to 9,682 million in 2014 before declining to 9,359 million in 2015. Overall, the expenses showed some fluctuation but remained relatively stable over the five-year period with a tendency towards a decrease in the last two years.
Inventories
Inventory levels displayed a fluctuating trend with an initial increase from 273 million US dollars in 2011 to 313 million in 2012. Subsequently, inventories declined slightly to 294 million in 2013, increased again marginally to 301 million in 2014, and then dropped significantly to 229 million in 2015. The sharp decrease in 2015 suggests improved inventory management or reduced inventory holding.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
The inventory turnover ratio declined gradually from 33.48 in 2011 to 31.48 in 2012, then showed a slight recovery trend to 32.32 in 2013 and 32.17 in 2014. Notably, in 2015, the ratio increased markedly to 40.87. This significant rise in 2015 indicates more efficient use of inventory, reflecting either faster sales or reduced inventory levels. The improved turnover in 2015 aligns with the reduction in inventory holdings observed in the same year.

Receivables Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Company sales
Accounts and notes receivable, net
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Company sales ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, net
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data over the five-year period exhibits several key trends and changes worthy of note.

Company Sales

The company's sales experienced fluctuations rather than consistent growth. Starting at $10,893 million in 2011, sales increased to a peak of $11,833 million in 2012. However, a decline followed in 2013 to $11,184 million, after which sales remained relatively stable through 2014 and 2015, ending at $11,145 million. This pattern suggests a brief period of growth followed by stagnation or mild contraction in revenue.

Accounts and Notes Receivable, Net

Accounts and notes receivable increased steadily across the five years, rising from $286 million in 2011 to $377 million in 2015. This consistent upward movement indicates an expansion in the credit extended to customers or perhaps slower collections, which may have implications for working capital management.

Receivables Turnover Ratio

The receivables turnover ratio declined markedly from 38.09 in 2011 to 29.56 in 2015. Since this ratio measures how efficiently the company collects its receivables, the downward trend suggests a deceleration in collections, with receivables turning over less frequently. This trend aligns with the growth in accounts receivable and could indicate either more lenient credit policies or collection challenges.

Overall, the data shows a decoupling between stable sales and increasing accounts receivable, accompanied by a reduction in the efficiency of receivables collection. The company may need to assess credit terms or collection processes to optimize cash flow and working capital.


Payables Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Company restaurant expenses
Accounts payable
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Payables turnover = Company restaurant expenses ÷ Accounts payable
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Company Restaurant Expenses
The company restaurant expenses increased from 9140 million US dollars in 2011 to a peak of 9852 million US dollars in 2012. After this peak, expenses showed a fluctuating but generally decreasing trend, dropping to 9359 million US dollars by the end of 2015. This pattern suggests initial rising costs followed by some cost containment or efficiency improvements over the subsequent years.
Accounts Payable
Accounts payable displayed a gradual decline over the observed period, decreasing from 712 million US dollars in 2011 to 616 million US dollars in 2015. This reduction may indicate either improved payment management, lower purchasing on credit, or efforts to decrease outstanding liabilities.
Payables Turnover Ratio
The payables turnover ratio increased from 12.84 times in 2011 to 15.19 times in 2015, showing an overall improvement in the company's efficiency in paying its suppliers. A higher ratio suggests that the company is paying its payable accounts more rapidly relative to its purchases. Despite slight fluctuations in 2013 and 2014, the upward trend is clear and consistent with the decreasing accounts payable balance.

Working Capital Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets
Less: Current liabilities
Working capital
 
Company sales
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Company sales ÷ Working capital
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Working Capital
There is a clear downward trend in working capital over the five-year period, decreasing significantly from -129 million US dollars in 2011 to -1400 million US dollars in 2015. This indicates a continuous deterioration in the company’s short-term liquidity position, with the negative working capital becoming substantially larger each year.
Company Sales
Sales demonstrate a relatively stable pattern during the period analyzed, starting at 10,893 million US dollars in 2011, peaking at 11,833 million in 2012, before slightly declining and fluctuating around the 11,000 million mark through to 2015. There is no substantial growth or decline in company sales, suggesting consistent revenue generation without significant expansion or contraction.
Working Capital Turnover
The absence of data for working capital turnover ratios means it is not possible to evaluate how efficiently the company is using its working capital to generate sales. However, given the negative and declining working capital, it is likely that this metric would reflect challenges in operational efficiency or liquidity management.

Average Inventory Processing Period

YUM! Brands Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibits a generally stable trend from 2011 to 2014, fluctuating slightly between 31.48 and 33.48. However, there is a marked increase in 2015, rising significantly to 40.87. This suggests that the company improved the efficiency of its inventory management in the final year, resulting in faster inventory cycles and potentially better sales velocity or inventory utilization.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period closely mirrors the inventory turnover trend, starting at 11 days in 2011, increasing slightly to 12 days in 2012, and then stabilizing again at 11 days through 2014. In 2015, there is a notable reduction to 9 days, aligning with the sharp increase in inventory turnover. This decrease indicates that the company was able to reduce the time inventory remains on hand, contributing to greater operational efficiency.
Overall Insight
The data collectively indicate that while the company maintained consistent inventory management practices from 2011 to 2014, a strategic improvement or operational change occurred in 2015. This change significantly enhanced inventory turnover and shortened the average processing period, reflecting improved inventory control and possibly a more responsive supply chain or better demand forecasting.

Average Receivable Collection Period

YUM! Brands Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio demonstrates a downward trend over the analyzed period. It starts at 38.09 in 2011, slightly increases to 39.31 in 2012, then consistently declines over the next three years, reaching 29.56 by the end of 2015. This indicates that the company is collecting its receivables less frequently each year after 2012, which may suggest a slowdown in the efficiency of credit management or changes in credit policy.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period remains relatively stable around 9 to 10 days for the first four years, fluctuating between 9 and 10 days, and then increases to 12 days in 2015. This aligns with the decline in receivables turnover, reflecting that the time taken to collect receivables has slightly lengthened. Although the increase is moderate, this shift might warrant further examination to understand whether it results from operational changes or shifts in customer payment behavior.
Overall Insight
The inverse relationship observed between the receivables turnover ratio and the average collection period is typical; as the turnover decreases, the collection period lengthens. The data suggests a weakening in the efficiency of receivables management from 2012 to 2015. Such a trend could impact cash flow and operational liquidity, highlighting the need for potential improvements in credit policies or collection strategies to maintain or enhance the working capital cycle.

Operating Cycle

YUM! Brands Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period
Average receivable collection period
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= + =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Inventory Turnover Efficiency
The average inventory processing period exhibited a slight fluctuation over the analyzed years. It started at 11 days in 2011, increased marginally to 12 days in 2012, reverted to 11 days in the subsequent two years, and then decreased to 9 days in 2015. This downward trend toward the end of the period indicates an improvement in inventory management efficiency, suggesting that the company became more effective in processing inventory within a shorter timeframe.
Receivables Collection
The average receivable collection period remained relatively stable initially, with a slight decline from 10 days in 2011 to 9 days in 2012, before stabilizing at 10 days in 2013 and 2014. However, in 2015, this period increased to 12 days, indicating a longer duration to collect receivables. This increase may signal emerging challenges in credit collection or changes in customer payment behavior during that year.
Operating Cycle Consistency
The operating cycle maintained a constant duration of 21 days throughout the entire five-year period. This constancy suggests that despite fluctuations in inventory processing and receivables collection periods, the overall cycle time for converting inventory and receivables into cash remained steady, reflecting balanced operational performance in these areas.

Average Payables Payment Period

YUM! Brands Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio shows an overall increasing trend over the five-year period. Starting at 12.84 in 2011, the ratio increased to 14.4 in 2012, then slightly decreased to 13.5 in 2013. From 2013 onwards, there is a steady increase reaching 13.95 in 2014 and then 15.19 in 2015. This pattern indicates that the company has been improving its efficiency in paying its suppliers over the period, particularly notable in the last two years.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period follows an inverse trend relative to the payables turnover. It starts at 28 days in 2011 and decreases to 25 days in 2012. In 2013, it slightly increases to 27 days, then decreases again to 26 days in 2014, and finally reaches 24 days in 2015. This decline suggests that the company has been reducing the time it takes to pay its suppliers, improving its payment promptness. The fluctuations in the middle years show some variability, but the overall trend is towards shorter payment periods.

Cash Conversion Cycle

YUM! Brands Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period
Average receivable collection period
Average payables payment period
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= + =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Inventory Processing
The average inventory processing period remained relatively stable over the five-year span, fluctuating slightly between 9 and 12 days. After maintaining around 11 to 12 days in the initial years, it decreased noticeably in the final year to 9 days, indicating an improvement in inventory turnover efficiency.
Receivable Collection
The average receivable collection period demonstrated minor variability, staying within 9 to 12 days. There was a slight decline from 10 days in 2011 to 9 days in 2012, followed by consistent figures around 10 days in the subsequent years, before increasing to 12 days in the last year. This uptick in the final period suggests a marginal slowdown in collecting receivables.
Payables Payment
The average payables payment period showed a downward trend overall, reducing from 28 days in 2011 to 24 days by the end of 2015. Notable fluctuations occurred in the interim years, but the consistent decline indicates a tendency toward quicker payment to suppliers.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle (CCC) improved slightly across the years but remained negative throughout the entire period. Starting from -7 days in 2011, it increased towards zero, reaching -3 days in 2015. This negative CCC suggests that the company collects cash from customers before it needs to pay its suppliers, with the cycle becoming shorter, reflecting enhanced working capital management efficiency.