EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
CoStar Group Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to CoStar Group Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) fluctuates, it does not generate sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital employed. Invested capital increased substantially over the observed timeframe, contributing to the widening gap between NOPAT and the cost of capital.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from US$240.403 million in 2018 to US$333.240 million in 2019, representing a significant improvement. However, it decreased to US$250.569 million in 2020 before recovering to US$362.411 million in 2021. In 2022, NOPAT declined again to US$321.495 million. This indicates volatility in operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, ranging between 13.25% and 13.76%. A slight decrease was observed in 2021, but it increased again in 2022. The consistency suggests a stable risk profile and financing structure.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital experienced substantial growth. It increased from US$3,312.194 million in 2018 to US$3,711.336 million in 2019. A significant jump occurred in 2020, reaching US$6,661.421 million, and continued to rise to US$7,034.732 million in 2021 and US$8,182.919 million in 2022. This expansion in invested capital, without a corresponding increase in NOPAT sufficient to cover the cost of that capital, is a key driver of the negative economic profit.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative in each year of the period. The deficit widened consistently, moving from -US$212.932 million in 2018 to -US$775.536 million in 2022. This indicates that the company’s returns on invested capital are consistently below its cost of capital. The increasing magnitude of the negative economic profit suggests a growing disparity between capital deployment and value creation.
The trend suggests that while the company is growing its invested capital base, it is not generating sufficient operating profits to justify that investment, given its cost of capital. Continued monitoring of NOPAT and efficient capital allocation are crucial to improve economic profitability.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data over the five-year period presents a mixed but generally positive trend in key profitability metrics.
- Net Income
-
Net income showed a generally upward trajectory, starting at $238.3 million in 2018 and increasing to $369.5 million by 2022. A peak was observed in 2019 at nearly $315 million, followed by a decline in 2020 down to approximately $227 million, which may indicate the impact of adverse conditions during that year. The figure rebounded in 2021 with a substantial increase to nearly $293 million and further grew in 2022, reaching the highest level in the period analyzed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT also exhibited variability throughout the period but maintained an overall upward trend. It began at $240.4 million in 2018 and rose sharply to $333.2 million in 2019. Similar to net income, there was a decline in 2020 to $250.6 million. However, NOPAT increased markedly to $362.4 million in 2021, representing the highest value in the time series, before slightly decreasing to $321.5 million in 2022.
In summary, both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong performance despite some volatility, particularly in 2020. The decline in 2020 could reflect external challenges faced during that time. The recovery and growth in subsequent years suggest resilience and improved operational efficiency, with net income reaching new highs by 2022, while NOPAT remains elevated above the initial years, indicating sustained profitability from core operations.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes shows a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. It increased significantly from 45,681 thousand USD in 2018 to 75,986 thousand USD in 2019. The amount then decreased to 43,852 thousand USD in 2020, followed by a sharp rise to 111,404 thousand USD in 2021. In 2022, it slightly increased further to 117,004 thousand USD. This pattern indicates volatility in the company's tax provisioning, with notable peaks in 2019, 2021, and 2022.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes also experienced considerable variability over the analyzed period. Starting at 39,802 thousand USD in 2018, there was a large increase to 65,509 thousand USD in 2019. The figure slightly declined to 60,078 thousand USD in 2020, then increased substantially to 94,697 thousand USD in 2021, and further to 142,190 thousand USD in 2022. This upward trajectory in recent years suggests growing cash outflows related to operating tax obligations.
- Comparative insights
- Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes exhibit a generally increasing trend from 2018 through 2022, despite short-term decreases in 2020. Notably, cash operating taxes have increased by approximately 257% over the five years, outpacing the increase in provision for income taxes, which rose by about 156% over the same period. The divergence, especially in 2022 where cash operating taxes exceed the provision by a substantial margin, may indicate timing differences, changes in tax payment schedules, or adjustments related to deferred taxes. This pattern warrants attention for cash flow planning and tax management.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.
Over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, several notable trends are evident in the financial structure related to debt, equity, and invested capital.
- Total reported debt & leases
- This category initially decreased from 2018 to 2019, dropping from approximately $169 million to $150 million. However, it experienced a substantial increase in 2020, rising sharply to over $1.1 billion. Following this spike, the debt level remained relatively stable through 2021 and 2022, with minor decreases each year, concluding near $1.1 billion in 2022. This suggests a significant increase in leverage occurred in 2020, which then plateaued in subsequent years.
- Stockholders’ equity
- This component demonstrated consistent growth throughout the entire period. Beginning at around $3 billion in 2018, equity increased steadily each year, reaching approximately $3.4 billion in 2019, then accelerating to $5.4 billion in 2020. Growth continued in 2021 and 2022, ending at roughly $6.9 billion. This sustained increase indicates ongoing value creation for shareholders and a strengthening balance sheet in terms of equity financing.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital also exhibited a robust upward trend. Starting at about $3.3 billion in 2018, it rose gradually to $3.7 billion in 2019 before experiencing a sharp increase to over $6.6 billion in 2020. This growth persisted through 2021 and 2022, peaking at over $8.1 billion. The pattern mirrors the increases seen in both debt and equity, reflecting higher total capitalization and investment in company assets or operations.
In summary, the data reflect a strategic expansion in capital structure beginning in 2020, marked by a significant rise in both debt and equity, alongside a growing invested capital base. The escalation in reported debt and leases coincided with heightened equity levels, suggesting balanced financing efforts rather than reliance on debt alone. The steady increase in stockholders’ equity and invested capital signals stronger capitalization and potentially enhanced investment in growth initiatives during the analyzed period.
Cost of Capital
CoStar Group Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistent decline over the five-year period. Simultaneously, economic profit remains negative throughout the observed timeframe, and invested capital exhibits a substantial upward trend.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio decreased from -6.43% in 2018 to -9.48% in 2022. This indicates a widening gap between the company’s return on invested capital and its weighted average cost of capital. The ratio’s negative values consistently suggest that the company is not generating returns exceeding its cost of capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit is negative for each year presented, ranging from a loss of US$212,932 thousand in 2018 to a loss of US$775,536 thousand in 2022. The magnitude of the loss increased significantly over the period, indicating a worsening ability to generate value for investors.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased steadily from US$3,312,194 thousand in 2018 to US$8,182,919 thousand in 2022. This growth in invested capital, coupled with consistently negative economic profit, suggests that the company is deploying more capital into ventures that are not yielding sufficient returns to cover their cost.
The combined trends suggest a deteriorating financial performance in terms of value creation. While the company continues to invest capital, its ability to generate returns above its cost of capital is declining, resulting in increasing economic losses.
Economic Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
The economic profit margin exhibited a consistently negative trend over the five-year period. While remaining negative throughout, the magnitude of the negative margin increased substantially between 2018 and 2022.
- Economic Profit Margin
- In 2018, the economic profit margin was -17.75%. This figure improved to -12.51% in 2019, representing a decrease in the negative margin. However, 2020 saw a significant deterioration, with the margin falling to -38.72%. A partial recovery occurred in 2021, with the margin reported at -29.00%, but this was followed by a further decline to -35.42% in 2022. This indicates increasing destruction of shareholder value as measured by EVA relative to revenue.
The adjusted revenues demonstrated a consistent upward trend throughout the period. Despite this revenue growth, the economic profit margin did not improve commensurately, suggesting that the cost of capital, or other factors impacting economic profit, are increasing at a faster rate than revenue.
- Relationship between Economic Profit Margin and Adjusted Revenues
- Adjusted revenues increased from US$1,199,321 thousand in 2018 to US$2,189,457 thousand in 2022. This represents a substantial growth in revenue. However, the economic profit margin moved from -17.75% to -35.42% over the same period. This divergence suggests that while the company is generating more revenue, it is not translating into improved economic profitability. The increasing negative margin, despite revenue growth, warrants further investigation into the underlying drivers of economic profit.
The most substantial decline in economic profit margin occurred between 2019 and 2020, and again between 2021 and 2022. These periods represent areas of particular concern and should be examined in greater detail to understand the factors contributing to the reduced economic profitability.