Stock Analysis on Net

CoStar Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CSGP)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 26, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

CoStar Group Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
The net operating profit after taxes exhibited variability over the analyzed period. Starting at approximately $240 million in 2018, it increased notably to around $333 million in 2019, followed by a decline to roughly $251 million in 2020. Subsequently, NOPAT rose significantly to about $362 million in 2021 before decreasing again to approximately $321 million in 2022. This pattern indicates fluctuating operational profitability with peaks in 2019 and 2021, and noticeable downturns in 2020 and 2022.
Cost of capital
The cost of capital remained relatively stable over the five years, with minor fluctuations. It started at around 13.54% in 2018, exhibiting a slight increase in 2019 to 13.62%, then gradually decreased to 13.3% in 2020 and further to 13.11% in 2021, before a minor rise to 13.27% in 2022. The generally steady trend suggests limited changes in the company's financing risk or market conditions affecting its capital costs during this timeframe.
Invested capital
Invested capital showed a significant upward trajectory. Beginning at approximately $3.31 billion in 2018, there was moderate growth to $3.71 billion in 2019. However, 2020 marked a substantial increase to around $6.66 billion, followed by continued growth to about $7.03 billion in 2021 and $8.18 billion in 2022. This considerable expansion indicates the company substantially increased its capital base, potentially through asset acquisitions or reinvestments, accelerating notably in 2020 and beyond.
Economic profit
Economic profit was negative throughout the entire period, reflecting the company’s returns did not fully cover its cost of capital. The deficit improved slightly from -$208 million in 2018 to -$172 million in 2019. However, it deteriorated markedly in 2020, reaching approximately -$636 million, followed by a modest recovery to about -$560 million in 2021 before declining again to nearly -$764 million in 2022. The persistent and increasing negative economic profit, especially from 2020 onward, suggests growing inefficiencies or challenges in generating returns above the capital costs despite increasing invested capital.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

CoStar Group Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income8
Investment income, after taxes9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.

8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data over the five-year period presents a mixed but generally positive trend in key profitability metrics.

Net Income

Net income showed a generally upward trajectory, starting at $238.3 million in 2018 and increasing to $369.5 million by 2022. A peak was observed in 2019 at nearly $315 million, followed by a decline in 2020 down to approximately $227 million, which may indicate the impact of adverse conditions during that year. The figure rebounded in 2021 with a substantial increase to nearly $293 million and further grew in 2022, reaching the highest level in the period analyzed.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)

NOPAT also exhibited variability throughout the period but maintained an overall upward trend. It began at $240.4 million in 2018 and rose sharply to $333.2 million in 2019. Similar to net income, there was a decline in 2020 to $250.6 million. However, NOPAT increased markedly to $362.4 million in 2021, representing the highest value in the time series, before slightly decreasing to $321.5 million in 2022.

In summary, both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong performance despite some volatility, particularly in 2020. The decline in 2020 could reflect external challenges faced during that time. The recovery and growth in subsequent years suggest resilience and improved operational efficiency, with net income reaching new highs by 2022, while NOPAT remains elevated above the initial years, indicating sustained profitability from core operations.


Cash Operating Taxes

CoStar Group Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Provision for income taxes
The provision for income taxes shows a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. It increased significantly from 45,681 thousand USD in 2018 to 75,986 thousand USD in 2019. The amount then decreased to 43,852 thousand USD in 2020, followed by a sharp rise to 111,404 thousand USD in 2021. In 2022, it slightly increased further to 117,004 thousand USD. This pattern indicates volatility in the company's tax provisioning, with notable peaks in 2019, 2021, and 2022.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes also experienced considerable variability over the analyzed period. Starting at 39,802 thousand USD in 2018, there was a large increase to 65,509 thousand USD in 2019. The figure slightly declined to 60,078 thousand USD in 2020, then increased substantially to 94,697 thousand USD in 2021, and further to 142,190 thousand USD in 2022. This upward trajectory in recent years suggests growing cash outflows related to operating tax obligations.
Comparative insights
Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes exhibit a generally increasing trend from 2018 through 2022, despite short-term decreases in 2020. Notably, cash operating taxes have increased by approximately 257% over the five years, outpacing the increase in provision for income taxes, which rose by about 156% over the same period. The divergence, especially in 2022 where cash operating taxes exceed the provision by a substantial margin, may indicate timing differences, changes in tax payment schedules, or adjustments related to deferred taxes. This pattern warrants attention for cash flow planning and tax management.

Invested Capital

CoStar Group Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Long-term debt, net
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Available-for-sale investments7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.


Over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, several notable trends are evident in the financial structure related to debt, equity, and invested capital.

Total reported debt & leases
This category initially decreased from 2018 to 2019, dropping from approximately $169 million to $150 million. However, it experienced a substantial increase in 2020, rising sharply to over $1.1 billion. Following this spike, the debt level remained relatively stable through 2021 and 2022, with minor decreases each year, concluding near $1.1 billion in 2022. This suggests a significant increase in leverage occurred in 2020, which then plateaued in subsequent years.
Stockholders’ equity
This component demonstrated consistent growth throughout the entire period. Beginning at around $3 billion in 2018, equity increased steadily each year, reaching approximately $3.4 billion in 2019, then accelerating to $5.4 billion in 2020. Growth continued in 2021 and 2022, ending at roughly $6.9 billion. This sustained increase indicates ongoing value creation for shareholders and a strengthening balance sheet in terms of equity financing.
Invested capital
Invested capital also exhibited a robust upward trend. Starting at about $3.3 billion in 2018, it rose gradually to $3.7 billion in 2019 before experiencing a sharp increase to over $6.6 billion in 2020. This growth persisted through 2021 and 2022, peaking at over $8.1 billion. The pattern mirrors the increases seen in both debt and equity, reflecting higher total capitalization and investment in company assets or operations.

In summary, the data reflect a strategic expansion in capital structure beginning in 2020, marked by a significant rise in both debt and equity, alongside a growing invested capital base. The escalation in reported debt and leases coincided with heightened equity levels, suggesting balanced financing efforts rather than reliance on debt alone. The steady increase in stockholders’ equity and invested capital signals stronger capitalization and potentially enhanced investment in growth initiatives during the analyzed period.


Cost of Capital

CoStar Group Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

CoStar Group Inc., economic spread ratio calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =


Economic Profit
The economic profit of the company has consistently been negative throughout the observed period, indicating that the returns did not exceed the cost of capital. Initially, there was a slight improvement from -208,172 thousand US dollars in 2018 to -172,162 thousand in 2019. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2020, with economic profit deteriorating to -635,702 thousand US dollars, followed by a moderate recovery in 2021 to -559,680 thousand. In 2022, the economic profit again declined, reaching -764,088 thousand US dollars, marking the lowest point in the period.
Invested Capital
The invested capital demonstrated a strong upward trajectory over the five years. Starting from approximately 3.31 billion US dollars in 2018, the capital invested increased steadily each year, reaching more than 8.18 billion US dollars by the end of 2022. The most notable surge occurred between 2019 and 2020, where invested capital nearly doubled, suggesting significant expansion or acquisition activity.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio, which measures the difference between return on invested capital and cost of capital as a percentage, remained negative throughout. Its magnitude initially improved from -6.29% in 2018 to -4.64% in 2019, implying a smaller gap between returns and costs. However, subsequent years saw this ratio worsen significantly, dropping to -9.54% in 2020 and then slightly improving to -7.96% in 2021 before deteriorating again to -9.34% in 2022. This pattern indicates persistent challenges in generating returns exceeding the cost of capital.
Overall Analysis
The company has been increasing its invested capital substantially, likely aiming for growth or enhanced operational capacity. Nevertheless, the consistently negative economic profit and economic spread ratio suggest that these investments have yet to produce favorable returns relative to the cost of capital. The fluctuations in economic profit and spread ratio underline volatility in operational efficiency or market conditions. The negative trends in the latter years, particularly in 2022, raise concerns about the effectiveness of recent investments and the firm's ability to create economic value.

Economic Profit Margin

CoStar Group Inc., economic profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenues
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =


Adjusted Revenues
The adjusted revenues exhibited a consistent upward trend from 2018 through 2022. Starting at approximately 1.2 billion US dollars in 2018, revenues increased each year, reaching nearly 2.2 billion US dollars by 2022. This indicates a steady growth in the company's top line over the five-year period.
Economic Profit
Economic profit remained negative throughout the analyzed years, indicating that the company did not generate value over its cost of capital in any of the periods. The economic losses deepened significantly in 2020 and continued at similar elevated levels through 2022. The lowest economic profit was recorded in 2020 at approximately -636 million US dollars, then slightly improved in 2021 but worsened again in 2022, suggesting challenges in achieving profitability despite revenue growth.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin, expressed as a percentage, also reflected a consistently negative scenario across the years. Although the margin improved from -17.36% in 2018 to -12.13% in 2019, it deteriorated sharply in 2020 to -38.16%. The margin somewhat recovered in 2021 to -28.5%, but again declined to -34.9% in 2022. This pattern indicates fluctuations in efficiency and profitability relative to revenues, with a notable decline during the middle years and partial recovery that was not sustained.
Overall Insights
Despite steady revenue growth, the company struggled with economic profitability. The substantial negative economic profits and margins suggest that the company's returns did not cover the cost of capital, pointing to either high operating costs, investments with delayed returns, or other financial inefficiencies. The volatility in economic profit margin further underlines challenges in managing profitability over the period. Strategic initiatives might be necessary to improve cost management or enhance value creation to translate revenue growth into positive economic profits.