EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
CoStar Group Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to CoStar Group Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes exhibits variability over the analyzed periods. Starting at approximately $240 million, it increased significantly to around $333 million in the following year. However, there was a notable decline to approximately $251 million in 2020, followed by a recovery to roughly $362 million in 2021. In 2022, NOPAT decreased again to approximately $321 million. This pattern indicates fluctuations in operating profitability with periods of growth and contraction.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the periods evaluated, fluctuating slightly between 13.05% and 13.56%. This minor variation suggests a consistent capital cost environment without significant changes impacting financing costs or the risk profile of investments.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed a continuous upward trajectory across the years. Beginning at around $3.31 billion, it increased to approximately $3.71 billion in 2019. A significant jump occurred in 2020, with invested capital almost doubling to roughly $6.66 billion. This upward trend continued, reaching about $7.03 billion in 2021 and escalating further to $8.18 billion in 2022. The data reveal substantial growth in the company’s investment base, potentially indicating expansion or acquisitions.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was consistently negative in all periods under examination, indicating that the company's returns did not exceed its cost of capital. Although the negative value decreased from approximately -$206 million in 2018 to -$170 million in 2019, it worsened substantially in 2020 to nearly -$632 million. While there was slight improvement in 2021 to around -$556 million, economic profit declined again in 2022 to its lowest point at approximately -$760 million. This persistent negative economic profit underscores challenges in value creation despite increasing invested capital.
- Summary
- Overall, the data illustrate a company experiencing growth in invested capital alongside fluctuating operating profitability. Despite temporary improvements in NOPAT, the persistently negative economic profit suggests that the company has struggled to generate returns above its cost of capital. The steady cost of capital alongside increasing invested capital and volatile profits implies potential inefficiencies or strategic investments yet to yield sufficient returns to create economic value.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data over the five-year period presents a mixed but generally positive trend in key profitability metrics.
- Net Income
-
Net income showed a generally upward trajectory, starting at $238.3 million in 2018 and increasing to $369.5 million by 2022. A peak was observed in 2019 at nearly $315 million, followed by a decline in 2020 down to approximately $227 million, which may indicate the impact of adverse conditions during that year. The figure rebounded in 2021 with a substantial increase to nearly $293 million and further grew in 2022, reaching the highest level in the period analyzed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT also exhibited variability throughout the period but maintained an overall upward trend. It began at $240.4 million in 2018 and rose sharply to $333.2 million in 2019. Similar to net income, there was a decline in 2020 to $250.6 million. However, NOPAT increased markedly to $362.4 million in 2021, representing the highest value in the time series, before slightly decreasing to $321.5 million in 2022.
In summary, both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong performance despite some volatility, particularly in 2020. The decline in 2020 could reflect external challenges faced during that time. The recovery and growth in subsequent years suggest resilience and improved operational efficiency, with net income reaching new highs by 2022, while NOPAT remains elevated above the initial years, indicating sustained profitability from core operations.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes shows a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. It increased significantly from 45,681 thousand USD in 2018 to 75,986 thousand USD in 2019. The amount then decreased to 43,852 thousand USD in 2020, followed by a sharp rise to 111,404 thousand USD in 2021. In 2022, it slightly increased further to 117,004 thousand USD. This pattern indicates volatility in the company's tax provisioning, with notable peaks in 2019, 2021, and 2022.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes also experienced considerable variability over the analyzed period. Starting at 39,802 thousand USD in 2018, there was a large increase to 65,509 thousand USD in 2019. The figure slightly declined to 60,078 thousand USD in 2020, then increased substantially to 94,697 thousand USD in 2021, and further to 142,190 thousand USD in 2022. This upward trajectory in recent years suggests growing cash outflows related to operating tax obligations.
- Comparative insights
- Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes exhibit a generally increasing trend from 2018 through 2022, despite short-term decreases in 2020. Notably, cash operating taxes have increased by approximately 257% over the five years, outpacing the increase in provision for income taxes, which rose by about 156% over the same period. The divergence, especially in 2022 where cash operating taxes exceed the provision by a substantial margin, may indicate timing differences, changes in tax payment schedules, or adjustments related to deferred taxes. This pattern warrants attention for cash flow planning and tax management.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.
Over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, several notable trends are evident in the financial structure related to debt, equity, and invested capital.
- Total reported debt & leases
- This category initially decreased from 2018 to 2019, dropping from approximately $169 million to $150 million. However, it experienced a substantial increase in 2020, rising sharply to over $1.1 billion. Following this spike, the debt level remained relatively stable through 2021 and 2022, with minor decreases each year, concluding near $1.1 billion in 2022. This suggests a significant increase in leverage occurred in 2020, which then plateaued in subsequent years.
- Stockholders’ equity
- This component demonstrated consistent growth throughout the entire period. Beginning at around $3 billion in 2018, equity increased steadily each year, reaching approximately $3.4 billion in 2019, then accelerating to $5.4 billion in 2020. Growth continued in 2021 and 2022, ending at roughly $6.9 billion. This sustained increase indicates ongoing value creation for shareholders and a strengthening balance sheet in terms of equity financing.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital also exhibited a robust upward trend. Starting at about $3.3 billion in 2018, it rose gradually to $3.7 billion in 2019 before experiencing a sharp increase to over $6.6 billion in 2020. This growth persisted through 2021 and 2022, peaking at over $8.1 billion. The pattern mirrors the increases seen in both debt and equity, reflecting higher total capitalization and investment in company assets or operations.
In summary, the data reflect a strategic expansion in capital structure beginning in 2020, marked by a significant rise in both debt and equity, alongside a growing invested capital base. The escalation in reported debt and leases coincided with heightened equity levels, suggesting balanced financing efforts rather than reliance on debt alone. The steady increase in stockholders’ equity and invested capital signals stronger capitalization and potentially enhanced investment in growth initiatives during the analyzed period.
Cost of Capital
CoStar Group Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit has remained negative throughout the observed period, indicating that the company has consistently not generated returns above its cost of capital. The deficit showed some improvement from 2018 to 2019, decreasing in magnitude from approximately -206 million to -170 million US dollars. However, there was a significant deterioration in 2020, with economic profit falling sharply to around -632 million US dollars. Though a slight recovery occurred in 2021, economic profit again worsened notably in 2022, reaching approximately -760 million US dollars. This suggests continuing challenges in generating value beyond invested capital.
- Invested Capital
- The company’s invested capital has exhibited a consistent upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at around 3.3 billion US dollars at the end of 2018, it increased steadily each year to reach over 8.1 billion US dollars by the end of 2022. The most pronounced growth occurred between 2019 and 2020, where invested capital nearly doubled. This substantial increase in capital investment may have been aimed at growth or expansion but has not been matched by improvements in economic profit during the same period.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, which measures the return on invested capital relative to its cost, has remained negative throughout the period analyzed. The ratio improved from -6.23% in 2018 to -4.58% in 2019, indicating a modest improvement in economic performance relative to capital costs. However, this was followed by a sharp decline in 2020 to -9.49%, reflecting significantly reduced efficiency or profitability on the invested capital. Though there was a partial recovery to -7.90% in 2021, the ratio deteriorated again in 2022 to -9.28%, suggesting ongoing difficulties in generating adequate returns on investments.
- Overall Insights
- The financial indicators collectively reveal that the company has been expanding its capital base significantly while struggling to achieve corresponding value creation or profitability above its cost of capital. The persistent negative economic profit and negative economic spreads underscore challenges in operational efficiency or return generation. Moreover, the worsening situation since 2020 suggests that recent investments have not translated into improved economic performance, signaling potential strategic or market challenges to address in future periods.
Economic Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
- Revenue Trends
- There is a consistent upward trend in adjusted revenues over the five-year period. Revenues increased steadily from approximately 1.2 billion US dollars in 2018 to nearly 2.2 billion US dollars by the end of 2022, indicating significant growth in the company's top-line performance.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit figures remain negative throughout the observed period, reflecting losses when accounting for the cost of capital. Although the economic loss improved somewhat from 2018 to 2019, moving from about -206 million to -170 million US dollars, the company faced a substantial increase in economic losses in 2020, exceeding -630 million US dollars. While 2021 saw a reduction in economic loss to approximately -556 million US dollars, the loss widened again in 2022 to nearly -760 million US dollars.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin follows a negative trajectory, consistent with the economic profit losses. It starts at -17.2% in 2018, improves slightly to -12.0% in 2019, then deteriorates sharply to -37.9% in 2020. Despite some recovery to -28.3% in 2021, it worsens again to -34.7% in 2022, indicating that the negative economic profitability intensified in recent years relative to the company’s revenue base.
- Summary of Financial Performance
- Overall, the company exhibits strong growth in adjusted revenues but continues to generate significant economic losses throughout the five years reviewed. The volatility and worsening of economic profit margins, particularly post-2019, suggest that while sales grew robustly, the costs, capital charges, or the company's underlying profitability dynamics adversely affected economic value creation. This pattern highlights potential challenges in translating revenue growth into economic profitability.