Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. (NASDAQ:WBA)

The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) fluctuates, it does not generate sufficient returns to cover the cost of invested capital, resulting in economic losses each year.

NOPAT Trend

Net operating profit after taxes increased significantly from 2014 to 2015, rising from US$3,086 million to US$5,501 million. Subsequent years show more moderate fluctuations, with a decrease in 2016 to US$4,855 million, a slight increase in 2017 to US$5,246 million, a further increase to US$5,934 million in 2018, and a minor decline to US$5,719 million in 2019. Despite these variations, NOPAT remains positive throughout the analyzed period.

Cost of Capital Trend

The cost of capital initially increased from 11.22% in 2014 to 11.69% in 2015. It then experienced a slight decrease to 11.35% in 2016, followed by a further reduction to 11.28% in 2017 and 11.16% in 2018. A notable decrease occurred in 2019, with the cost of capital falling to 9.97%. This suggests a decreasing risk profile or improved financing conditions over time.

Invested Capital Trend

Invested capital increased substantially from US$55,001 million in 2014 to US$80,730 million in 2015. It continued to rise to US$85,356 million in 2016 before decreasing to US$76,485 million in 2017. Invested capital remained relatively stable in 2018 at US$76,286 million and experienced a slight increase to US$77,429 million in 2019. The large initial increase in invested capital likely reflects significant strategic investments.

Economic Profit Trend

Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the period. The magnitude of the loss decreased over time, moving from -US$3,084 million in 2014 to -US$1,998 million in 2019. This improvement is attributable to the combined effect of increasing NOPAT and decreasing cost of capital, although the substantial level of invested capital continues to outweigh the generated profits. The reduction in economic loss indicates a gradual improvement in value creation, but the company still fails to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.

In summary, while NOPAT demonstrates some growth and the cost of capital declines, the substantial invested capital base results in persistent negative economic profit. The trend suggests a gradual improvement in economic performance, but significant adjustments to capital allocation or operational efficiency would be required to achieve positive economic profit.

Net earnings attributable to Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

The net earnings exhibit volatility over the six-year period. Starting at 1,932 million USD in 2014, there is a significant increase to 4,220 million USD in 2015. This level is mostly sustained through 2016 and 2017, with values of 4,173 and 4,078 million USD respectively. In 2018, net earnings peak at 5,024 million USD, marking the highest point in the period analyzed. However, a decline occurs in 2019, where earnings fall to 3,982 million USD, indicating a downward shift after the 2018 peak.

Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

The NOPAT shows an overall upward trend with some fluctuations. Beginning at 3,086 million USD in 2014, it rises sharply to 5,501 million USD in 2015. After this peak, it dips to 4,855 million USD in 2016, before increasing again in 2017 and 2018 to 5,246 and 5,934 million USD respectively. The highest NOPAT value is recorded in 2018. In 2019, NOPAT slightly decreases to 5,719 million USD but remains close to the peak level, indicating relatively stable operating profitability in recent years compared to net earnings.

Income Tax Provision

The income tax provision exhibited a general downward trend from 2014 to 2019. Beginning at $1,526 million in 2014, the figure decreased steadily through subsequent years, reaching $588 million in 2019. Notably, the most significant decline occurred between 2017 and 2019.

Cash Operating Taxes

Cash operating taxes remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2018, fluctuating within a narrow range from $1,667 million to $1,856 million. However, in 2019, there was a sharp decrease to $831 million, which represents a substantial reduction compared to the previous years.

Overall Observations

Both income tax provision and cash operating taxes showed significant declines by 2019 compared to earlier periods. While income tax provision steadily decreased over the years, cash operating taxes were stable for several years before dropping markedly in the last year observed. These trends may reflect changes in tax policies, operational adjustments, or shifts in taxable income and cash tax payments.

The financial data reveals several notable trends concerning the company's capital structure and invested capital over the six-year period ending in 2019.

Total reported debt & leases

This figure shows an overall increasing trend from 31,909 million USD in 2014 to 43,464 million USD in 2019, with a peak at 46,508 million USD in 2016. After reaching this peak, there is a decline in 2017 to 39,129 million USD, followed by a gradual increase again through 2018 and 2019. This pattern suggests a significant increase in leveraging activities up to 2016, some deleveraging or repayment in 2017, and subsequent additional borrowings or lease liabilities through 2019.

Total shareholders’ equity

Shareholders' equity exhibits a declining trend over the period. Starting at 20,457 million USD in 2014, the equity rose sharply to 30,861 million USD in 2015 but then continuously decreased each year thereafter to 23,512 million USD by 2019. This reduction over time indicates a depletion of equity capital, which could be attributed to factors such as sustained net losses, dividend distributions exceeding net income, share repurchases, or other equity-reducing activities.

Invested capital

The invested capital closely aligns with the combined effect of debt and equity, representing the total capital used in operations. It increased substantially from 55,001 million USD in 2014 to a peak of 85,356 million USD in 2016. Following this peak, invested capital decreased to 76,485 million USD in 2017 and remained relatively stable, with a slight increase, reaching 77,429 million USD by 2019. This behavior suggests expansion or acquisition activity up to 2016, followed by a period of consolidation or capital optimization in subsequent years.

In summary, the company experienced considerable growth in debt financing and invested capital until 2016, accompanied by an initial rise and then a steady decline in shareholders' equity. The data implies a strategic shift post-2016, characterized by deleveraging and stabilization of invested capital, while equity erosion continued, highlighting potential risks related to capital structure and financial sustainability.

The period between August 31, 2014, and August 31, 2019, demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While the magnitude of the economic loss decreased over time, the company did not generate positive economic profit during this timeframe.

Economic Profit

Economic profit exhibited a fluctuating, yet generally decreasing, negative trend. Starting at a loss of US$3,084 million in 2014, it reached its largest negative value of US$4,831 million in 2016. Subsequent years saw a reduction in the size of the loss, culminating in a loss of US$1,998 million in 2019. This suggests improving, though still insufficient, profitability relative to the capital employed.

Invested Capital

Invested capital increased significantly from US$55,001 million in 2014 to US$80,730 million in 2015. It then plateaued, fluctuating between US$76,286 million and US$85,356 million for the remaining years. The initial increase in invested capital, coupled with continued negative economic profit, likely contributed to the initial widening of the negative economic spread.

Economic Spread Ratio

The economic spread ratio consistently registered negative values throughout the analyzed period, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. The ratio moved from -5.61% in 2014 to -4.88% in 2015, then worsened to -5.66% in 2016. A gradual improvement was observed in the later years, with the ratio reaching -2.58% in 2019. This improvement aligns with the decreasing magnitude of the economic loss, suggesting a narrowing gap between returns and the cost of capital, but still indicating value destruction.

Overall, the trend suggests a gradual improvement in the company’s ability to generate returns relative to its invested capital, but it remained below the cost of capital throughout the period. The reduction in economic loss and the improving economic spread ratio are positive indicators, though continued monitoring is necessary to determine if these trends will lead to positive economic profit in future periods.

The economic profit margin exhibited a fluctuating, yet generally improving, trend over the observed period. While consistently negative, the magnitude of the economic loss decreased from 2014 to 2019. This suggests a gradual improvement in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital, although profitability relative to sales remained below the breakeven point throughout the analyzed timeframe.

Economic Profit

Economic profit demonstrated volatility. Initial values were significantly negative, peaking in absolute value in 2016 at -4,831 US$ millions. Subsequent years showed a reduction in the absolute value of the loss, reaching -1,998 US$ millions by 2019. This indicates a lessening of the gap between the company’s operating profits and its cost of capital.

Sales

Sales experienced consistent growth throughout the period. Starting at 76,392 US$ millions in 2014, sales increased to 136,866 US$ millions in 2019. This growth in revenue did not translate into positive economic profit during the period, but it did coincide with the diminishing economic losses.

Economic Profit Margin

The economic profit margin, calculated as economic profit divided by sales, began at -4.04% in 2014. It fluctuated, reaching -4.12% in 2016, before steadily improving to -1.46% in 2019. The consistent negativity indicates that the cost of capital consistently exceeded the returns generated from sales. However, the increasing values suggest that the company became more efficient in converting sales into economic profit, or that the cost of capital decreased relative to sales.

The observed trend suggests that while the company experienced revenue growth, its ability to generate economic profit improved over time. The reduction in the economic profit margin’s negative value indicates a positive, albeit gradual, shift in financial performance relative to the company’s cost of capital.