EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Amazon.com Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Amazon.com Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance, as measured by economic value added (EVA) metrics, exhibits significant fluctuations over the five-year period. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) demonstrates considerable volatility, transitioning from a positive value in 2021 to a substantial loss in 2022, followed by recovery and growth through 2025. Invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, while the cost of capital remained relatively stable. Consequently, economic profit remained negative throughout the observed timeframe, though the magnitude of the loss diminished over time.
- NOPAT Trend
- NOPAT began at US$37,525 million in 2021, experienced a significant decline to a loss of US$5,619 million in 2022, and then recovered to US$31,856 million in 2023. Further growth was observed in 2024, reaching US$58,988 million, and continued into 2025 with a value of US$90,849 million. This indicates a substantial turnaround in operational profitability following the challenges encountered in 2022.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital fluctuated modestly between 19.78% and 21.12% over the period. It started at 20.61% in 2021, decreased to 19.78% in 2022, increased to 20.68% in 2023, rose further to 21.12% in 2024, and then slightly decreased to 20.89% in 2025. The relative stability suggests that changes in the cost of capital did not drive the major shifts in economic profit.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, beginning at US$202,836 million in 2021 and rising to US$475,175 million in 2025. This represents a significant expansion of the capital base, potentially supporting future growth but also increasing the capital charge.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative for all five years. The largest loss occurred in 2022, at US$58,904 million, coinciding with the lowest NOPAT. Losses were US$4,279 million in 2021, US$35,705 million in 2023, US$20,300 million in 2024, and US$8,399 million in 2025. While remaining negative, the magnitude of the loss decreased each year, indicating improving, though still insufficient, returns relative to the cost of capital.
The increasing invested capital, coupled with a relatively stable cost of capital, suggests that the primary driver of the improving economic profit trend is the substantial growth in NOPAT. Continued monitoring of NOPAT relative to the cost of capital and invested capital will be crucial to assess whether the company can achieve positive economic profit in the future.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in unearned revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
5 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
8 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
Net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited significant fluctuations over the five-year period. While both metrics generally trended upwards, a substantial loss was recorded in 2022 before returning to positive figures and demonstrating accelerating growth in subsequent years.
- Overall Trend
- Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate a recovery from a loss in 2022, followed by substantial growth through 2025. The period is characterized by volatility, particularly in 2022, but concludes with strong positive performance.
- Net Income
- Net income reached US$33,364 million in 2021. A significant loss of US$2,722 million was recorded in 2022. Subsequent years saw a return to profitability, with net income increasing to US$30,425 million in 2023, US$59,248 million in 2024, and reaching US$77,670 million in 2025. This represents a considerable upward trajectory following the 2022 downturn.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income. It stood at US$37,525 million in 2021, experienced a loss of US$5,619 million in 2022, and then increased to US$31,856 million in 2023. Growth accelerated in 2024 to US$58,988 million, culminating in US$90,849 million in 2025. NOPAT consistently exceeded net income in 2021, 2023, 2024, and 2025, suggesting the impact of non-operating items on overall net income.
- Relationship between Net Income and NOPAT
- The divergence between net income and NOPAT in 2022 indicates that non-operating items significantly contributed to the overall net loss. The increasing gap between NOPAT and net income in later years suggests a growing influence of non-operating activities on reported net income. The consistent positive NOPAT values, even during the net income loss in 2022, highlight the underlying operational profitability of the business.
The substantial growth in both metrics from 2023 to 2025 suggests improved operational efficiency and/or increased revenue generation. The 2022 results warrant further investigation to understand the specific factors contributing to the loss.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
The provision for income taxes, net, exhibits significant volatility over the observed period. A positive value of US$4,791 million in 2021 transitioned to a substantial negative value of US$3,217 million in 2022, indicating a tax benefit was recognized. This was followed by positive values in subsequent years, increasing to US$7,120 million in 2023, US$9,265 million in 2024, and reaching US$19,087 million in 2025.
Cash operating taxes demonstrate an overall increasing trend, though with fluctuations. Beginning at US$5,646 million in 2021, the figure rose to US$5,689 million in 2022, remaining relatively stable. A considerable increase is then observed, reaching US$13,583 million in 2023 and US$14,023 million in 2024. A notable decrease occurs in 2025, with cash operating taxes falling to US$7,866 million.
- Relationship between Provision for Income Taxes and Cash Operating Taxes
- The difference between the provision for income taxes, net, and cash operating taxes suggests timing differences in recognizing income tax expense. In 2022, the negative provision for income taxes contrasts with positive cash operating taxes, indicating deferred tax assets were realized or tax loss carryforwards utilized. The increasing gap between the two metrics from 2023 to 2024 suggests a growing divergence between book and tax accounting, potentially due to increased non-cash expenses or changes in tax regulations. The narrowing of this gap in 2025, driven by the decrease in cash operating taxes, could indicate a reversal of some of these timing differences.
The substantial increase in both the provision for income taxes, net, and cash operating taxes from 2022 to 2023 and 2024 warrants further investigation. This could be attributable to increased profitability, changes in the tax rate, or adjustments to deferred tax liabilities. The decline in cash operating taxes in 2025, despite the continued increase in the provision for income taxes, net, suggests a potential shift in the composition of taxable income or the utilization of tax credits.
- Trend Analysis - Cash Operating Taxes
- From 2021 to 2024, cash operating taxes increased by approximately 148.8%. The subsequent decrease of approximately 43.8% in 2025 represents a significant shift and requires further scrutiny to determine the underlying causes. This fluctuation could be linked to changes in business operations, tax planning strategies, or external economic factors.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of unearned revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The invested capital of the company demonstrates a consistent upward trend over the five-year period. Simultaneously, changes are observed in the components contributing to this invested capital, namely total reported debt & leases and stockholders’ equity.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital increased from US$202,836 million in 2021 to US$475,175 million in 2025. This represents a cumulative increase of 134.1% over the period. The rate of increase appears to be accelerating, with larger absolute increases observed in later years.
- Debt & Leases
- Total reported debt & leases exhibited an initial increase from US$132,318 million in 2021 to US$154,972 million in 2022. It then decreased slightly to US$154,556 million in 2023, followed by a further decrease to US$147,838 million in 2024. However, a notable increase to US$169,934 million is observed in 2025. While fluctuations occur, the debt level remains relatively stable overall, with the 2025 value being approximately 28.4% higher than the 2021 value.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity shows a substantial and consistent increase throughout the period. Starting at US$138,245 million in 2021, it rises to US$201,875 million in 2023, then significantly to US$285,970 million in 2024, and culminates at US$411,065 million in 2025. This represents a cumulative increase of approximately 197.8% from 2021 to 2025. The growth in stockholders’ equity is a primary driver of the overall increase in invested capital.
- Relationship between Components and Invested Capital
- The growth in invested capital is largely attributable to the significant increase in stockholders’ equity. While debt & leases fluctuate, the consistent expansion of equity provides the primary impetus for the overall upward trend in invested capital. The increasing proportion of equity financing within the capital structure is apparent.
The observed trends suggest a strengthening financial position, characterized by increasing investment in the business and a growing reliance on equity funding. Further analysis would be required to determine the efficiency with which this invested capital is being utilized to generate returns.
Cost of Capital
Amazon.com Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | ||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | ||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a clear improving trend over the five-year period. Initially negative, the ratio moves progressively closer to zero, indicating a reduction in the disparity between the company’s return on invested capital and its weighted average cost of capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- In 2021, the economic spread ratio stood at -2.11%. This indicates that the company’s return on invested capital was 2.11% lower than its cost of capital. A substantial decline is observed in 2022, with the ratio reaching -21.87%, representing a significant underperformance relative to the cost of capital.
- The ratio improved considerably in 2023 to -10.93%, suggesting a partial recovery in profitability relative to capital costs. This positive trend continued into 2024, with the ratio further improving to -5.41%.
- By 2025, the economic spread ratio reached -1.77%, the closest value to zero observed throughout the period. This signifies a substantial narrowing of the gap between returns and capital costs, indicating improved capital allocation efficiency.
The invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, rising from US$202,836 million in 2021 to US$475,175 million in 2025. Despite this increase in capital employed, the improving economic spread ratio suggests that the company became more effective at generating returns from its investments over time.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the analyzed period, although the magnitude of the loss decreased over time. The largest loss occurred in 2022 at -US$58,904 million, coinciding with the most negative economic spread ratio. The loss decreased to -US$8,399 million by 2025, aligning with the improvement in the economic spread ratio.
The combined trends of increasing invested capital and a progressively improving economic spread ratio suggest a shift towards more efficient capital utilization. While the company still generated negative economic profit in absolute terms, the trend indicates a move towards value creation as the difference between returns and capital costs diminishes.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | ||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | ||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin demonstrates a consistent, though moderating, improvement over the five-year period. Initially negative and substantial, the margin moved towards a less negative position year over year.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2021, the economic profit margin stood at -0.91%. This figure deteriorated significantly in 2022, reaching -11.41%, indicating a substantial decrease in economic profit relative to adjusted net sales. A notable improvement occurred in 2023, with the margin increasing to -6.16%. This positive trend continued into 2024, where the margin further improved to -3.16%. The most recent year, 2025, shows a further reduction in the negative margin, reaching -1.17%.
The magnitude of the economic profit itself also reflects this pattern. While remaining negative throughout the period, the absolute value of economic profit decreased from US$4,279 million in 2021 to US$8,399 million in 2025. This decrease in the absolute value of the loss, coupled with the increasing adjusted net sales, drives the observed improvement in the economic profit margin.
- Relationship between Adjusted Net Sales and Economic Profit Margin
- Adjusted net sales exhibited consistent growth throughout the period, increasing from US$472,241 million in 2021 to US$717,297 million in 2025. The improvement in the economic profit margin, despite consistently negative economic profit, suggests that sales growth is not fully offsetting the factors reducing economic profit. However, the rate of margin improvement suggests increasing efficiency in converting sales into economic profit.
The consistent negative economic profit margin indicates that the company’s returns are not covering its cost of capital throughout the analyzed period, although the trend suggests a narrowing gap.