EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Paramount Global pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Paramount Global for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) initially increased significantly before declining substantially, while the cost of capital remained relatively stable. Invested capital experienced a considerable rise followed by a slight decrease. Consequently, economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the analyzed timeframe, and its absolute value worsened over the years.
- NOPAT Trend
- Net operating profit after taxes exhibited an upward trend from 2018 to 2021, increasing from US$2,342 million to US$5,241 million. However, a significant decrease was observed in 2022, with NOPAT falling to US$1,431 million. This represents a substantial decline from the prior year’s performance.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital fluctuated between 12.56% and 16.50% during the period. It initially decreased from 16.50% in 2018 to 12.56% in 2019, then increased again to 16.19% in 2020. The cost of capital stabilized in the subsequent two years, remaining at approximately 13.9% in 2021 and 2022.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased substantially from US$15,419 million in 2018 to US$45,938 million in 2021. A modest decrease was noted in 2022, with invested capital settling at US$44,287 million. The majority of the growth occurred between 2018 and 2020.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative in each year of the analyzed period. The negative economic profit widened from US$-202 million in 2018 to US$-4,736 million in 2022. The largest absolute decline in economic profit occurred between 2021 and 2022, coinciding with the substantial decrease in NOPAT. Despite increases in NOPAT in earlier years, the cost of capital and the significant growth in invested capital consistently resulted in an economic loss.
The consistent negative economic profit suggests that the company’s returns on invested capital have not been sufficient to cover its cost of capital throughout the period. The recent decline in NOPAT, coupled with a high level of invested capital, has exacerbated this situation.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenues.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to Paramount.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to Paramount.
9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
11 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Earnings Attributable to Paramount
- The net earnings displayed fluctuations over the observed period. Starting at 1,960 million US$ in 2018, the earnings increased significantly to 3,308 million US$ in 2019. In 2020, there was a decline to 2,422 million US$, followed by a marked recovery in 2021 reaching 4,543 million US$. However, by the end of 2022, net earnings experienced a sharp decrease to 1,104 million US$.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT trend showed consistent growth from 2018 through 2021. Beginning at 2,342 million US$ in 2018, it rose steadily to 3,590 million US$ in 2019 and 3,726 million US$ in 2020, before peaking at 5,241 million US$ in 2021. In 2022, NOPAT declined significantly to 1,431 million US$.
- Overall Financial Performance Trend
- Both net earnings and NOPAT illustrate overall growth periods until 2021, suggesting improved operational efficiency and profitability. The substantial decrease in both indicators in 2022 could reflect adverse conditions impacting profitability, warranting further investigation into underlying causes during this period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibited significant volatility over the observed period. In 2018, the provision was a positive amount of 273 million USD, which then notably shifted to a benefit (negative provision) of 9 million USD in 2019. This reversal indicates that the company likely recorded a tax credit or adjustment during that year. Subsequently, in 2020, the provision sharply increased to 535 million USD, followed by a further increase to 646 million USD in 2021. However, in 2022, the provision decreased substantially to 227 million USD, yet remained positive. These fluctuations suggest variations in taxable income, tax strategies, or changes in tax regulations impacting the company’s effective tax expense year over year.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a rising trend from 2018 to 2019, increasing markedly from 322 million USD to 967 million USD, which reflects a substantial increase in cash taxes paid or payable. In 2020, this figure declined significantly to 633 million USD and then rose again to 766 million USD in 2021. The amount decreased once more in 2022 to 519 million USD. Despite the fluctuations, cash operating taxes remained considerably higher than the 2018 level throughout the remaining years, indicating sustained elevated tax payments on an operational cash basis despite some volatility.
- Overall Tax Trends
- The disparity between the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes suggests possible timing differences, tax deferrals, or differences between book and taxable income recognition. The volatility in the provision for income taxes compared to the somewhat elevated but fluctuating cash operating taxes indicates complex tax positions and possibly varying tax credits or adjustments over the years. The data reflects an environment of changing tax expenses and cash outflows related to taxes, which should be monitored further for underlying causes such as changes in profitability, tax law, or tax planning initiatives.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenues.
5 Addition of restructuring liability.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Paramount stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The financial data reveals significant shifts in the company's capital structure and financial position over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases initially increased sharply from $11,083 million in 2018 to a peak of $21,622 million in 2020. After this peak, a downward trend is evident, as the figure declined to $19,632 million in 2021 and further to $17,566 million in 2022. This suggests a partial deleveraging strategy following a period of increasing debt levels.
- Total Paramount Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders' equity exhibited a marked rise throughout the timeframe. It grew substantially from $2,804 million in 2018 to $13,207 million in 2019, followed by a steady increase each year, reaching $23,036 million by 2022. This consistent equity growth indicates strengthening capitalization and possibly improved retained earnings or equity infusions over the period.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital expanded dramatically from $15,419 million in 2018 to $41,069 million in 2020, continuing upward to a peak of $45,938 million in 2021 before slightly decreasing to $44,287 million in 2022. The general upward trend reflects substantial investment in assets or operational scaling, with a minor contraction in the final year.
In summary, the company significantly increased its equity base and invested capital over the five years, alongside an initial expansion and subsequent reduction in debt levels. The reduction in debt combined with rising equity suggests improved financial stability and potentially enhanced capacity for future investment or debt management.
Cost of Capital
Paramount Global, cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
| Comcast Corp. | ||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
| Netflix Inc. | ||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | ||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the five-year period. This indicates that the company’s return on invested capital is less than its cost of capital, resulting in value destruction. The magnitude of this underperformance has increased significantly over time.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio was -1.31%. This worsened to -2.93% in 2019, representing a substantial decline. The ratio experienced its most significant decrease between 2019 and 2020, falling to -7.12%. A slight improvement was noted in 2021, with the ratio moving to -2.53%, however, this was short-lived. The ratio concluded the period at -10.69% in 2022, marking the lowest value observed and a considerable deterioration from the prior year.
The negative economic spread ratio consistently correlates with the negative economic profit reported each year. The increasing negative trend in the economic spread ratio suggests a growing gap between the company’s cost of capital and the returns generated from its invested capital. This suggests that the company is becoming less efficient at utilizing its capital to generate profits.
- Relationship to Invested Capital
- While invested capital increased significantly from 2018 to 2020 (from US$15,419 million to US$41,069 million), the economic spread ratio worsened during this period. This suggests that increases in invested capital were not translating into proportionally higher returns. Although invested capital decreased slightly in 2022, the economic spread ratio continued to decline, indicating that the issue is not solely related to the level of investment but rather the profitability of those investments.
The consistent negative economic profit, coupled with the declining economic spread ratio, highlights a concerning trend of value destruction. The company’s performance is falling further below the required rate of return for its investors.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues | ||||||
| Adjusted revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
| Comcast Corp. | ||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
| Netflix Inc. | ||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | ||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the observed five-year period. While economic profit itself fluctuates in absolute terms, the margin consistently indicates that the company’s returns are less than its cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2018, the economic profit margin was -1.39%. This figure deteriorated significantly to -3.89% in 2019, representing a substantial decrease in profitability relative to revenue. The most pronounced decline occurred in 2020, with the margin reaching -11.46%. A partial recovery was seen in 2021, with the margin improving to -4.05%, though remaining negative. However, this improvement proved short-lived, as the margin worsened considerably in 2022, ending the period at -15.78%.
The relationship between adjusted revenues and economic profit margin suggests that revenue growth alone has not been sufficient to offset the increasing shortfall between returns and the cost of capital. Despite increases in adjusted revenues in 2019, 2021, and 2022, the economic profit margin continued to decline or remained negative, indicating that the cost of generating those revenues exceeded the returns achieved.
- Magnitude of Decline
- The largest single-year decline in the economic profit margin was observed between 2019 and 2020, decreasing by 7.57 percentage points. The final year, 2022, also showed a significant deterioration, with a decrease of 11.73 percentage points from 2021. These substantial declines suggest underlying issues impacting profitability beyond typical business cycles.
The consistently negative economic profit margin across all observed years indicates a persistent destruction of shareholder value. The increasing negativity of the margin, particularly in 2020 and 2022, warrants further investigation into the factors driving these results, such as cost structure, capital allocation efficiency, and competitive pressures.