Stock Analysis on Net

Becton, Dickinson & Co. (NYSE:BDX)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 5, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Becton, Dickinson & Co., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The analysis of economic profit from 2016 to 2021 reveals a consistent failure to generate value above the cost of capital. Throughout the entire six-year period, economic profit remained negative, indicating that the returns generated from operating activities were insufficient to cover the opportunity cost of the invested capital.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
Operating profitability exhibited significant volatility. While NOPAT increased from 717 million US$ in 2016 to 1,300 million US$ in 2017, it experienced a sharp decline to 570 million US$ in 2018. A recovery trend followed, culminating in a substantial peak of 2,155 million US$ by September 30, 2021, marking the highest operating profit in the observed period.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
The capital base expanded rapidly between 2016 and 2018, rising from 22,258 million US$ to a peak of 47,282 million US$. Following this expansion, invested capital stabilized, fluctuating between 45,181 million US$ and 46,312 million US$ through 2021. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, oscillating within a narrow range between 10.55% and 11.31%.
Economic Profit Trends
The economic profit deficit widened significantly as the invested capital base grew, reaching its lowest point in 2018 with a loss of 4,580 million US$. This suggests that the increase in capital deployment did not yield proportional increases in operating profit during those years. However, a positive trajectory emerged in 2021, where the economic profit improved to -2,969 million US$, driven primarily by the surge in NOPAT despite a constant cost of capital and invested base.

In summary, the data shows a period of aggressive capital expansion that initially exacerbated economic losses. While the company demonstrated improved operational efficiency toward the end of the period, the overall economic profit remains negative, signifying that the business has not yet achieved a return on invested capital that exceeds its weighted average cost of capital.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Becton, Dickinson & Co., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in restructuring liability3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income8
Investment income, after taxes9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.

8 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Income
The net income figures exhibit considerable fluctuation over the reported periods. Starting at 976 million US dollars in 2016, it increased moderately to 1100 million in 2017. However, 2018 saw a sharp decline to 311 million, representing a significant downturn. This was followed by a strong recovery in 2019, where net income rose to 1233 million. A decline occurred again in 2020, as net income dropped to 874 million. The latest figure in 2021 indicates a substantial increase to 2092 million, marking the highest value in the dataset and demonstrating a notable overall upward trend despite earlier volatility.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT trends are somewhat aligned with net income, but they reflect less volatility. It started at 717 million US dollars in 2016 and sharply increased to 1300 million in 2017, marking a significant improvement. In 2018, NOPAT declined to 570 million, though this drop was less severe in relative terms compared to the net income decline in the same year. Subsequently, NOPAT recovered to 1105 million in 2019 and saw a slight decrease to 991 million in 2020. The year 2021 shows a dramatic increase to 2155 million, the highest point in the period, underscoring strong operational profitability improvements.
Summary Insights
Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate cyclical patterns characterized by steep declines followed by significant recoveries. The year 2018 stands out as an outlier with notably lower profitability, suggesting possible operational or market challenges during that period. The firm’s overall financial performance shows strong resilience and upward momentum by 2021, indicating effective management of costs and revenue growth leading to enhanced profitability. The 2021 figures exceeding previous highs imply robust financial health and operational efficiency.

Cash Operating Taxes

Becton, Dickinson & Co., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Income tax provision (benefit)
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the income tax provision (benefit) over the observed periods. Initially, the income tax provision shows a negative value in 2017 (-124 million USD), indicating a benefit rather than an expense. This contrasts with the positive provisions in 2016 (97 million USD) and the substantial increase to 862 million USD in 2018. The value dips again in 2019 to a negative figure (-57 million USD), signaling another tax benefit, followed by a recovery to positive values in 2020 and 2021, reaching 111 million USD and 150 million USD, respectively. This volatility suggests variability in taxable income or tax planning strategies affecting provisions for income taxes.

Cash operating taxes also exhibit variability but with somewhat less drastic changes. The cash tax payment starts at 748 million USD in 2016, sharply decreases to 109 million USD in 2017, then peaks dramatically at 1,285 million USD in 2018. After this peak, there is a decline to 711 million USD in 2019, followed by further decreases and stabilization around 508 million USD in 2020, and a slight increase to 537 million USD in 2021. This pattern may reflect changes in operational profitability, timing differences in tax payments, or varying tax obligations year over year.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
Displayed considerable volatility with alternating positive and negative values, suggesting fluctuations in reported taxable income or tax expense recognition.
Peak observed in 2018, with a significant tax expense recorded.
Negative values in 2017 and 2019 suggest periods where tax benefits or credits were recognized.
The latter years (2020 and 2021) show moderate positive provisions, indicating a potential stabilization.
Cash Operating Taxes
Experienced sharp variations, with the highest cash tax paid in 2018 aligning with the peak in income tax provision.
Following the 2018 peak, the cash tax outlay declined and stabilized at a lower level by 2020 and 2021.
This may suggest shifts in operational profitability, timing issues in tax payments, or changes in tax liabilities over these years.

Invested Capital

Becton, Dickinson & Co., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Short-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Restructuring liability4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted shareholders’ equity
Short-term investments7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of restructuring liability.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of short-term investments.


The financial data presented reveals notable trends in the company's capital structure and financing over the six-year period ending September 30, 2021.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
This item shows a significant increase from 2016 to 2018, rising from $11,801 million to a peak of $21,951 million in 2018. Subsequently, there is a consistent downward trend from 2018 through 2021, decreasing to $18,080 million. This decline may suggest efforts to reduce leverage or refinance obligations with lower levels of debt.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity exhibits strong growth throughout the period. Starting at $7,633 million in 2016, it more than doubles by 2018 to $20,994 million, then continues increasing steadily to nearly $23,677 million by 2021. This upward trajectory indicates sustained profitability or capital infusions supporting the equity base.
Invested Capital
Invested capital reflects the combined financing through debt and equity and follows a similar pattern as debt, increasing from $22,258 million in 2016 to a peak of $47,282 million in 2018. Afterward, invested capital experiences a moderate decline, ending at $45,278 million in 2021. This suggests that while the total capital invested in the business grew substantially initially, it has somewhat plateaued or been optimized in recent years.

Overall, the data indicates an initial period of expansion or increased financing up to 2018, followed by a phase of debt reduction and stability in total invested capital. The continuous growth in shareholders’ equity through this period highlights strengthening financial resilience and potential value creation for shareholders.


Cost of Capital

Becton, Dickinson & Co., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ÷ = × =
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ÷ = × =
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ÷ = × =
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ÷ = × =
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 24.50%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 24.50%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ÷ = × =
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ÷ = × =
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Becton, Dickinson & Co., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Abbott Laboratories
Elevance Health Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Medtronic PLC
UnitedHealth Group Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2016 to 2021 is characterized by consistent negative economic profit, indicating that the returns generated on invested capital were insufficient to cover the company's cost of capital throughout the observed period.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative across all six years, with a notable acceleration in value destruction between 2016 and 2018. Losses widened from -1,736 million US$ in 2016 to a peak deficit of -4,580 million US$ in 2018. Although there was a partial recovery by 2021, with economic profit improving to -2,969 million US$, the figure remains significantly lower than the 2016 level.
Invested Capital Dynamics
A period of rapid capital expansion occurred between 2016 and 2018, during which invested capital increased from 22,258 million US$ to 47,282 million US$. Following this surge, the invested capital base entered a phase of relative stability, fluctuating marginally between 45,181 million US$ and 46,312 million US$ from 2019 through 2021.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio remained negative throughout the period, highlighting a persistent failure to achieve a positive spread over the cost of capital. The ratio deteriorated to its lowest point of -9.69% in 2018, correlating with the peak in invested capital and the maximum economic loss. A gradual recovery trend is observed in the subsequent years, culminating in a ratio of -6.56% in 2021, which represents the most favorable position in the six-year sequence despite remaining negative.

Economic Profit Margin

Becton, Dickinson & Co., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Abbott Laboratories
Elevance Health Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Medtronic PLC
UnitedHealth Group Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the economic value added indicates that the organization operated with a negative economic profit throughout the period from 2016 to 2021. This suggests that the company's net operating profit after taxes was insufficient to cover the cost of the capital employed during these fiscal years.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit exhibited a downward trajectory between 2016 and 2018, declining from -1,736 million USD to a peak deficit of -4,580 million USD. Following this low point, a period of volatility occurred, with a slight recovery in 2019, a secondary dip in 2020, and a notable improvement by September 30, 2021, where the deficit narrowed to -2,969 million USD.
Revenue Correlation
Revenues demonstrated a consistent upward trend over the analyzed period, increasing from 12,483 million USD in 2016 to 20,248 million USD in 2021. Despite this substantial growth in top-line performance, the increase in scale did not immediately translate into positive economic profit, indicating that capital charges grew at a rate that outpaced operational gains for much of the period.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of the absolute economic profit. The margin deteriorated from -13.90% in 2016 to its most negative point of -28.65% in 2018. While the margin remained negative throughout the six-year window, a recovery phase is observed from 2019 onwards, concluding at -14.66% in 2021. This suggests an improving efficiency in utilizing capital relative to revenue generation toward the end of the period.

Overall, while the organization successfully expanded its revenue base, it struggled to achieve a positive economic spread. The convergence of the economic profit margin back toward 2016 levels by 2021, despite much higher revenues, indicates a potential shift toward better capital efficiency or a reduction in the relative cost of capital.