EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Becton, Dickinson & Co. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Becton, Dickinson & Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
Analysis of the economic profit and capital efficiency indicates a period of persistent value destruction, characterized by negative economic profit across all observed years. While operational profitability improved significantly by the end of the period, it remained insufficient to offset the financing charges associated with the cost of invested capital.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- Operational performance exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021. NOPAT fluctuated from 717 million USD in 2016 to a peak of 2,155 million USD in 2021. A notable contraction occurred in 2018, where profit dropped to 570 million USD, before recovering and trending upward through the final reporting year.
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
- A rapid expansion of the capital base is observed between 2016 and 2018, with invested capital increasing from 22,258 million USD to 47,282 million USD. Following this surge, the capital base stabilized, fluctuating slightly around the 45,000 million USD mark through 2021. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, maintaining a narrow range between 10.54% and 11.30%.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained consistently negative, indicating that the company failed to generate returns above its weighted average cost of capital. The economic loss widened significantly from -1,733 million USD in 2016 to a peak deficit of -4,574 million USD in 2018, correlating with the period of maximum capital investment. A gradual improvement in economic profit began after 2018, with the deficit narrowing to -2,963 million USD by 2021, driven largely by the substantial increase in NOPAT relative to the stabilized capital base.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
8 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income
- The net income figures exhibit considerable fluctuation over the reported periods. Starting at 976 million US dollars in 2016, it increased moderately to 1100 million in 2017. However, 2018 saw a sharp decline to 311 million, representing a significant downturn. This was followed by a strong recovery in 2019, where net income rose to 1233 million. A decline occurred again in 2020, as net income dropped to 874 million. The latest figure in 2021 indicates a substantial increase to 2092 million, marking the highest value in the dataset and demonstrating a notable overall upward trend despite earlier volatility.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT trends are somewhat aligned with net income, but they reflect less volatility. It started at 717 million US dollars in 2016 and sharply increased to 1300 million in 2017, marking a significant improvement. In 2018, NOPAT declined to 570 million, though this drop was less severe in relative terms compared to the net income decline in the same year. Subsequently, NOPAT recovered to 1105 million in 2019 and saw a slight decrease to 991 million in 2020. The year 2021 shows a dramatic increase to 2155 million, the highest point in the period, underscoring strong operational profitability improvements.
- Summary Insights
- Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate cyclical patterns characterized by steep declines followed by significant recoveries. The year 2018 stands out as an outlier with notably lower profitability, suggesting possible operational or market challenges during that period. The firm’s overall financial performance shows strong resilience and upward momentum by 2021, indicating effective management of costs and revenue growth leading to enhanced profitability. The 2021 figures exceeding previous highs imply robust financial health and operational efficiency.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the income tax provision (benefit) over the observed periods. Initially, the income tax provision shows a negative value in 2017 (-124 million USD), indicating a benefit rather than an expense. This contrasts with the positive provisions in 2016 (97 million USD) and the substantial increase to 862 million USD in 2018. The value dips again in 2019 to a negative figure (-57 million USD), signaling another tax benefit, followed by a recovery to positive values in 2020 and 2021, reaching 111 million USD and 150 million USD, respectively. This volatility suggests variability in taxable income or tax planning strategies affecting provisions for income taxes.
Cash operating taxes also exhibit variability but with somewhat less drastic changes. The cash tax payment starts at 748 million USD in 2016, sharply decreases to 109 million USD in 2017, then peaks dramatically at 1,285 million USD in 2018. After this peak, there is a decline to 711 million USD in 2019, followed by further decreases and stabilization around 508 million USD in 2020, and a slight increase to 537 million USD in 2021. This pattern may reflect changes in operational profitability, timing differences in tax payments, or varying tax obligations year over year.
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
- Displayed considerable volatility with alternating positive and negative values, suggesting fluctuations in reported taxable income or tax expense recognition.
- Peak observed in 2018, with a significant tax expense recorded.
- Negative values in 2017 and 2019 suggest periods where tax benefits or credits were recognized.
- The latter years (2020 and 2021) show moderate positive provisions, indicating a potential stabilization.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Experienced sharp variations, with the highest cash tax paid in 2018 aligning with the peak in income tax provision.
- Following the 2018 peak, the cash tax outlay declined and stabilized at a lower level by 2020 and 2021.
- This may suggest shifts in operational profitability, timing issues in tax payments, or changes in tax liabilities over these years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of restructuring liability.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of short-term investments.
The financial data presented reveals notable trends in the company's capital structure and financing over the six-year period ending September 30, 2021.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- This item shows a significant increase from 2016 to 2018, rising from $11,801 million to a peak of $21,951 million in 2018. Subsequently, there is a consistent downward trend from 2018 through 2021, decreasing to $18,080 million. This decline may suggest efforts to reduce leverage or refinance obligations with lower levels of debt.
- Shareholders’ Equity
- Shareholders’ equity exhibits strong growth throughout the period. Starting at $7,633 million in 2016, it more than doubles by 2018 to $20,994 million, then continues increasing steadily to nearly $23,677 million by 2021. This upward trajectory indicates sustained profitability or capital infusions supporting the equity base.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital reflects the combined financing through debt and equity and follows a similar pattern as debt, increasing from $22,258 million in 2016 to a peak of $47,282 million in 2018. Afterward, invested capital experiences a moderate decline, ending at $45,278 million in 2021. This suggests that while the total capital invested in the business grew substantially initially, it has somewhat plateaued or been optimized in recent years.
Overall, the data indicates an initial period of expansion or increased financing up to 2018, followed by a phase of debt reduction and stability in total invested capital. The continuous growth in shareholders’ equity through this period highlights strengthening financial resilience and potential value creation for shareholders.
Cost of Capital
Becton, Dickinson & Co., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 24.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 24.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | |||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | |||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |||||||
| Medtronic PLC | |||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
A consistent failure to generate positive economic value is observed between September 30, 2016, and September 30, 2021. The company maintained negative economic profit throughout the entire period, indicating that the returns on invested capital remained below the weighted average cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic losses experienced a significant expansion in the early part of the period, widening from -1,733 million USD in 2016 to a peak deficit of -4,574 million USD in 2018. A subsequent trend of partial recovery is noted, with economic profit improving to -2,963 million USD by 2021, although the figures remained firmly in negative territory.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- A period of rapid capital growth occurred between 2016 and 2018, with invested capital increasing from 22,258 million USD to 47,282 million USD. Following this surge, the capital base entered a phase of relative stabilization, fluctuating narrowly between 45,181 million USD and 46,312 million USD from 2019 through 2021.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio remained negative for all six years, confirming a persistent gap between the return on capital and the cost of capital. The ratio deteriorated to its lowest point of -9.67% in 2018, mirroring the peak in economic losses. An improvement trend is evident toward the end of the period, with the ratio reaching -6.54% in 2021, representing the most favorable performance within the analyzed timeframe despite the continued lack of value creation.
Economic Profit Margin
| Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | |||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | |||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |||||||
| Medtronic PLC | |||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2016 to 2021 reveals a persistent inability to generate positive economic value, as economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period. Despite a general upward trajectory in total revenues, which increased from 12,483 million USD in 2016 to 20,248 million USD in 2021, the cost of capital consistently exceeded the operating returns.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit experienced a significant decline between 2016 and 2018, reaching a period low of -4,574 million USD. While a partial recovery occurred in 2019, the figure remained deeply negative through 2020. A notable improvement was recorded in 2021, where the deficit narrowed to -2,963 million USD, indicating a reduction in value destruction.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of absolute economic profit, deteriorating from -13.88% in 2016 to a peak deficit of -28.62% in 2018. This represents the point of maximum inefficiency relative to revenue generation. Following this trough, the margin fluctuated before improving to -14.63% in 2021, the closest the margin came to breaking even since 2016.
- Revenue and Value Correlation
- A divergence is observed between revenue growth and economic value creation. Although revenues expanded by approximately 62% over the six-year period, the economic profit margin remained consistently negative. This suggests that the expansion in scale did not immediately translate into economic value. However, the improvement in the margin by 2021 suggests that the growth began to better absorb capital charges toward the end of the analyzed period.