Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
The overall trajectory of gross property, plant, and equipment demonstrates a period of relative stability between 2017 and 2019, followed by a significant expansion starting in 2020. Gross assets increased from approximately US$ 5.19 billion in 2017 to a peak of US$ 6.04 billion in 2021, before moderating to US$ 5.90 billion by June 30, 2022.
- Asset Composition and Growth
- Machinery and equipment consistently represent the largest portion of the asset base, increasing from US$ 3.17 billion in 2017 to US$ 3.59 billion in 2022. Buildings and building equipment followed a similar upward trajectory, particularly after 2019, reaching a peak of US$ 1.85 billion in 2021. Land and land improvements exhibited more volatility, characterized by a notable increase in 2020 that was partially reversed by 2022.
- Capital Expenditure Indicators
- Construction in progress has shown a sustained upward trend, rising from US$ 122 million in 2017 to US$ 204 million in 2022. This continuous growth suggests a strategic commitment to future capacity expansion and ongoing infrastructure investments.
- Depreciation and Net Book Value
- Accumulated depreciation grew steadily from US$ 3.25 billion in 2017 to US$ 3.78 billion in 2022, reflecting the systemic aging of the asset base. The net book value of property, plant, and equipment experienced a contraction until 2019, reaching a low of US$ 1.77 billion, before a sharp recovery to US$ 2.29 billion in 2020. Subsequent years showed a gradual decline in net value, ending at US$ 2.12 billion in 2022, indicating that depreciation expenses began to outpace the growth of gross asset acquisitions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
The analysis of asset age ratios from 2017 to 2022 reveals a stable property, plant, and equipment profile characterized by consistent depreciation patterns and periodic capital maintenance. The asset base maintains a relatively steady age distribution, with fluctuations remaining within a narrow range over the six-year period.
- Average Age Ratio
- The average age ratio exhibits a fluctuating but stable trend, starting at 66.79% in 2017 and reaching a peak of 69.68% in 2019. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, where the ratio dropped to 64.37%, indicating a potential infusion of newer assets or significant capital expenditures that lowered the overall relative age of the asset base. Since 2020, the ratio has trended upward again, reaching 67.71% by June 30, 2022.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
- The estimated total useful life of the assets has remained remarkably consistent, oscillating between 21 and 24 years. The slight decrease from 24 years in 2017 to a stabilized range of 21 to 22 years in subsequent years suggests a refinement in depreciation estimates or a shift in the composition of the asset portfolio toward equipment with slightly shorter lifespans.
- Estimated Asset Age and Remaining Life
- The estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, has fluctuated between 14 and 16 years, showing no long-term upward or downward trajectory. Correspondingly, the estimated remaining life has remained stable at either 7 or 8 years throughout the period. This stability indicates a disciplined asset replacement cycle, ensuring that the remaining productive capacity of the plant and equipment is maintained at a constant level.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land and land improvements)
= 100 × 3,775,197 ÷ (5,897,955 – 322,024) = 67.71%
The financial trajectory of property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) between 2017 and 2022 reflects a period of expansion in the asset base followed by a modest correction. Gross PP&E increased from 5.19 billion USD in 2017 to a peak of 6.04 billion USD in 2021, before settling at 5.90 billion USD in 2022.
- Accumulated Depreciation and Asset Aging
- Accumulated depreciation demonstrated a consistent upward trend, rising from 3.25 billion USD in 2017 to 3.78 billion USD in 2022. This steady increase indicates the continuous consumption of the economic benefits of the company's long-term assets. The average age ratio, which measures the proportion of the assets' useful life already expired, exhibited a peak of 69.68% in 2019, suggesting an aging asset base during the early part of the analyzed period.
- Capital Expenditure Influence
- A significant shift occurred in 2020, as the average age ratio dropped sharply to 64.37%. This decline coincided with a substantial increase in gross PP&E, which rose from 5.19 billion USD in 2019 to 5.81 billion USD in 2020. This pattern suggests a period of intensified capital expenditure and the acquisition of new assets, which effectively lowered the average age of the overall portfolio. Following this investment phase, the ratio began to trend upward again, reaching 67.71% by June 30, 2022.
- Land and Land Improvements
- Investments in land and land improvements remained relatively stable and represented a small fraction of the total PP&E. Values fluctuated between a low of 281 million USD in 2019 and a high of 346 million USD in 2020. The relative stability of these non-depreciable assets indicates that the fluctuations in the average age ratio and gross PP&E were primarily driven by investments in depreciable machinery and facilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land and land improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (5,897,955 – 322,024) ÷ 257,314 = 22
An analysis of the capital asset profile from 2017 to 2022 reveals a general expansion of the property, plant, and equipment base, coupled with a relatively stable approach to asset depreciation and estimated useful life.
- Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
- Gross property, plant, and equipment exhibited a growth trend, rising from 5,186,748 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 6,040,220 thousand US dollars in 2021, before experiencing a slight contraction to 5,897,955 thousand US dollars in 2022. This indicates a period of capital investment that peaked in 2021.
- Depreciation and Asset Consumption
- Depreciation expense mirrored the trajectory of gross assets, increasing from 202,868 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a high of 269,943 thousand US dollars in 2021. The subsequent decrease to 257,314 thousand US dollars in 2022 aligns with the reduction in total gross property, plant, and equipment, suggesting a consistent relationship between the asset base and its associated depreciation costs.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
- The estimated total useful life of assets has remained narrow and stable, fluctuating between 21 and 24 years. After a decrease from 24 years in 2017 to 21 years in 2018, the estimate has largely stabilized at 21 or 22 years. This stability suggests a consistent accounting policy regarding the expected longevity of capital assets despite fluctuations in the total volume of those assets.
- Land and Land Improvements
- Land and land improvements represented a small portion of the total gross asset base throughout the period. Values fluctuated from 321,331 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 345,746 thousand US dollars in 2020, before settling at 322,024 thousand US dollars in 2022. The relatively low volatility of this non-depreciable category indicates that growth in the overall PPE base was primarily driven by depreciable assets such as machinery or buildings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 3,775,197 ÷ 257,314 = 15
Analysis of the fixed asset data indicates a mature asset base with a consistent replacement cycle and a general upward trend in depreciation costs over the observed six-year period.
- Accumulated Depreciation and Asset Turnover
- Accumulated depreciation grew from US$ 3,249,456 thousand in 2017 to US$ 3,775,197 thousand in 2022. A notable trend is observed between 2021 and 2022, where the accumulated balance remained nearly flat despite a significant annual depreciation expense of US$ 257,314 thousand. This indicates a high volume of asset disposals or retirements during the 2022 fiscal year, which effectively offset the period's depreciation charges.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Annual depreciation expenses exhibited a general increase, rising from US$ 202,868 thousand in 2017 to a peak of US$ 269,943 thousand in 2021. The overall increase in annual charges suggests an expansion of the depreciable asset base or a shift toward assets with shorter useful lives prior to the slight contraction observed in 2022.
- Asset Age Stability
- The time elapsed since purchase remained remarkably stable, fluctuating only between 14 and 16 years. This lack of significant variance suggests a disciplined capital expenditure strategy, where new acquisitions are timed to replace aging assets at a rate that maintains a consistent average age of the productive capacity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land and land improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (2,122,758 – 322,024) ÷ 257,314 = 7
The net property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) exhibited volatility over the six-year period, characterized by a moderate decline until 2019, a sharp increase in 2020, and a subsequent gradual decrease through 2022. This fluctuation is mirrored in the land and land improvements valuations, which peaked in 2020 at $345.7 million before retreating to $322.0 million by 2022.
- Asset Base Valuation and Investment
- Net PP&E values reached a peak of $2.29 billion in 2020, representing a significant increase from the 2019 low of $1.77 billion. This suggests a period of substantial capital investment or asset acquisition during the 2020 fiscal year. Following this peak, a slow downward trend emerged, with the net value settling at $2.12 billion by June 30, 2022.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Depreciation expenses showed a general upward trajectory, rising from $202.9 million in 2017 to a peak of $270.0 million in 2021. The growth in depreciation expenses correlates with the expansion of the asset base observed in 2020. A slight reduction to $257.3 million occurred in 2022, aligning with the decrease in overall net PP&E.
- Estimated Remaining Asset Life
- The estimated remaining useful life of the assets remained remarkably stable, oscillating narrowly between 7 and 8 years. This consistency suggests a standardized depreciation policy and a predictable asset replacement cycle, regardless of the fluctuations in the total book value of the property, plant, and equipment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?