Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 is characterized by a general upward trajectory in operational earnings, punctuated by significant volatility between 2020 and 2022. EBITDA exhibited steady growth in the initial three years before experiencing a cyclical pattern of contraction and expansion.
- EBITDA Growth and Volatility
- A sustained increase in EBITDA is observed from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2019, rising from US$ 1,846,306 thousand to US$ 2,559,752 thousand. A temporary decline occurred in 2020, with EBITDA falling to US$ 2,358,319 thousand. This was followed by a sharp recovery in 2021, reaching a period peak of US$ 3,092,383 thousand, before contracting to US$ 2,441,242 thousand in 2022.
- Operational Efficiency and Earnings Correlation
- A high degree of correlation exists between EBITDA, EBIT, EBT, and Net Income. All four metrics follow an identical trend line, peaking in 2021 and declining in 2022. This alignment indicates that the fluctuations in profitability are primarily driven by operational performance rather than isolated changes in interest expenses or tax obligations.
- Analysis of Depreciation and Amortization
- The spread between EBITDA and EBIT, representing depreciation and amortization expenses, has expanded over the analyzed period. This variance increased from US$ 355,229 thousand in 2017 to US$ 571,764 thousand in 2022. The widening gap suggests a significant increase in the company's asset base or capital investments over time.
- Bottom-Line Conversion
- While EBITDA reached its maximum value in 2021, the conversion to net income remained proportional. The decline observed in 2022 is systemic, as EBITDA fell by approximately 21% from the 2021 peak, which mirrored a similar contraction in net income attributable to common shareholders, falling from US$ 1,746,100 thousand to US$ 1,315,605 thousand.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 55,695,791) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 2,441,242) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.81 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Boeing Co. | 24.15 |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 29.27 |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 28.89 |
| GE Aerospace | 27.32 |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 11.04 |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 15.38 |
| RTX Corp. | 18.82 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Capital Goods | 32.29 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Industrials | 24.74 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 47,574,598) | 45,011,584) | 34,689,668) | 24,040,987) | 26,811,235) | 25,893,192) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 2,441,242) | 3,092,383) | 2,358,319) | 2,559,752) | 2,382,235) | 1,846,306) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 19.49 | 14.56 | 14.71 | 9.39 | 11.25 | 14.02 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 13.86 | 12.43 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 19.18 | 17.06 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 14.82 | 95.57 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 18.01 | 15.57 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 14.98 | 11.97 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 14.92 | 15.48 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |||||||
| Capital Goods | 19.01 | 19.87 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |||||||
| Industrials | 16.46 | 16.30 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 47,574,598 ÷ 2,441,242 = 19.49
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data for the period between June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2022, reveals a significant expansion in enterprise value coupled with volatile operational earnings, resulting in a substantial increase in the valuation multiple by the end of the period.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- Enterprise value exhibited a general upward trajectory, rising from approximately $25.9 billion in 2017 to $47.6 billion by 2022. Following a slight contraction in 2019, a period of rapid acceleration occurred between 2020 and 2022, during which the value nearly doubled from its 2019 trough.
- EBITDA Performance
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization demonstrated inconsistency. After growing from $1.85 billion in 2017 to a peak of $3.09 billion in 2021, a notable decrease to $2.44 billion was recorded in 2022. This contraction in the final year occurred despite the continued growth in enterprise value.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio underwent three distinct phases. A compression phase was observed from 2017 to 2019, with the ratio falling from 14.02 to a period low of 9.39. This was followed by a stabilization phase in 2020 and 2021, where the ratio leveled at approximately 14.6. The period concluded with a sharp expansion in 2022, where the ratio reached a peak of 19.49, driven by the divergence between an increasing enterprise value and declining EBITDA.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?