Stock Analysis on Net

Lam Research Corp. (NASDAQ:LRCX)

$24.99

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Lam Research Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 29, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 25, 2023 Jun 26, 2022 Jun 27, 2021 Jun 28, 2020
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial performance, as measured by economic profit, demonstrates significant fluctuations over the observed period. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) increased substantially from 2020 to 2022, followed by a decline in 2023 and a partial recovery projected for 2024, with a strong increase anticipated in 2025. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, exhibiting a gradual upward trend. Invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, although a slight decrease is projected between 2023 and 2024.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit experienced substantial growth between 2020 and 2022, rising from US$241,953 thousand to US$3,047,590 thousand. This indicates a period of strong value creation. A significant decrease was observed in 2023, with economic profit falling to US$1,144,796 thousand. The decline continued in 2024 to US$345,187 thousand, before a projected substantial increase to US$2,864,462 thousand in 2025, suggesting a return to strong value creation.
NOPAT and Invested Capital Relationship
While NOPAT increased from 2020 to 2022, the concurrent increase in invested capital suggests that the company was actively reinvesting in its operations. The decrease in NOPAT in 2023, coupled with a continued increase in invested capital, contributed to the significant reduction in economic profit during that year. The projected decrease in invested capital between 2023 and 2024, combined with a slight recovery in NOPAT, partially offset the decline in economic profit. The anticipated strong NOPAT growth in 2025, alongside further increases in invested capital, is expected to drive a substantial increase in economic profit.
Cost of Capital Stability
The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, ranging from 18.31% to 19.81%. The gradual increase suggests a modest rise in the company’s funding costs, potentially due to broader macroeconomic factors. The consistency in the cost of capital allows for a clearer interpretation of the fluctuations in economic profit, as these are less likely to be driven by changes in the discount rate.

Overall, the period demonstrates a cyclical pattern in economic profit, influenced by the interplay between NOPAT, invested capital, and a relatively stable cost of capital. The projected performance for 2025 indicates a potential return to a period of strong value creation, contingent upon the realization of the anticipated NOPAT growth.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Lam Research Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 29, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 25, 2023 Jun 26, 2022 Jun 27, 2021 Jun 28, 2020
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in product warranty reserves4
Increase (decrease) in restructuring liability5
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents6
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability7
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense8
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes9
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income10
Investment income, after taxes11
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty reserves.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.

6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

7 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

8 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.

10 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Income
The net income demonstrated a generally positive trend over the analyzed period, with some fluctuations. Starting at approximately 2.25 billion USD in 2020, it almost doubled in 2021 to 3.91 billion USD and increased further to about 4.61 billion USD in 2022. A slight decrease occurred in 2023, falling to 4.51 billion USD, followed by a more pronounced decline in 2024 to 3.83 billion USD. However, in 2025, net income surged significantly to approximately 5.36 billion USD, marking the highest point in the time frame.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT showed a generally upward trajectory until 2022, beginning at about 2.40 billion USD in 2020 and increasing substantially to approximately 5.63 billion USD by 2022. However, there was a notable reduction in the following years; NOPAT dropped to 4.06 billion USD in 2023 and further declined to 3.26 billion USD in 2024. A strong recovery is observed in 2025, with NOPAT rising sharply to around 6.11 billion USD, the highest value recorded in the examined periods.
General Observations
Both net income and NOPAT largely followed similar trends, with growth peaking in 2022, followed by declines in 2023 and 2024, prior to significant recoveries in 2025. The reductions in 2023 and 2024 suggest temporary challenges affecting profitability and operational efficiency. The considerable rebound in 2025 indicates successful measures to restore profitability and operational performance. Overall, the company appears to maintain strong profit-generating capabilities with cyclical variability.

Cash Operating Taxes

Lam Research Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 29, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 25, 2023 Jun 26, 2022 Jun 27, 2021 Jun 28, 2020
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).


Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes exhibits a generally increasing trend from 2020 through 2023, rising from approximately 323 million US dollars in 2020 to nearly 598 million US dollars in 2023. However, in the subsequent year (2024), there is a noticeable decline to about 532 million US dollars, before rising again significantly in 2025 to approximately 600 million US dollars. This pattern suggests some fluctuation in estimated tax liabilities despite an overall upward movement.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes show a consistent and marked upward trajectory over the entire period analyzed. Starting at approximately 361 million US dollars in 2020, cash taxes almost double to around 654 million US dollars in 2021. The upward momentum continues sharply into 2022 with cash taxes reaching about 883 million US dollars. Although there is a downward adjustment in 2023 and 2024—declining to roughly 782 million and 718 million US dollars respectively—the value increases again considerably in 2025 to approximately 954 million US dollars. This indicates variability in actual cash outflows for taxes, with a generally increasing trend over the six-year period.
Comparative Insights
When comparing provision for income taxes with cash operating taxes, cash taxes have consistently been higher than provisions throughout all years. The gap between these two metrics widens substantially from 2020 to 2022, implying that actual tax payments in cash increasingly exceeded estimated provisions in these years. Although provisions increase steadily, the fluctuations and higher amounts in cash operating taxes may reflect timing differences, changes in tax planning strategies, or variations in tax payments versus accrual estimates.

Invested Capital

Lam Research Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jun 29, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 25, 2023 Jun 26, 2022 Jun 27, 2021 Jun 28, 2020
Current portion of long-term debt and finance lease obligations
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations, less current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance3
Deferred revenue4
Product warranty reserves5
Restructuring liability6
Equity equivalents7
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax8
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of product warranty reserves.

6 Addition of restructuring liability.

7 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total debt and leases demonstrate a declining trend over the reported periods. Starting from approximately 5.98 billion in mid-2020, the amount decreases to around 4.76 billion by mid-2025. This suggests a possible strategy of reducing leverage or paying down debt over the years, particularly notable from mid-2024 to mid-2025.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity shows a consistent upward trend across all periods. It grows from about 5.17 billion in 2020 to nearly 9.86 billion in 2025. This significant increase indicates enhanced company value or accumulated earnings, suggesting strengthened financial health and increased net assets over time.
Invested Capital
Invested capital rises steadily from approximately 11.79 billion in 2020 to around 16.36 billion in 2025, with a minor dip observed between mid-2023 and mid-2024. This overall upward movement reflects continued investment in operations or assets, supporting growth initiatives or expansion efforts.

Cost of Capital

Lam Research Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Lam Research Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 29, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 25, 2023 Jun 26, 2022 Jun 27, 2021 Jun 28, 2020
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio demonstrates significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initially, the ratio exhibits a substantial increase followed by a considerable decline, and then a resurgence. This pattern mirrors the changes in economic profit, but is also influenced by the concurrent changes in invested capital.

Economic Spread Ratio Trend
In June 2020, the economic spread ratio stood at 2.05%. A dramatic increase is then observed, reaching 17.92% in June 2021. This represents a significant improvement in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. However, the ratio decreased substantially to 7.64% in June 2023, indicating a diminished economic advantage. A slight recovery to 2.33% occurred in June 2024, before a strong increase to 17.51% in June 2025.

The economic spread ratio’s volatility suggests a sensitivity to underlying economic profit and invested capital levels. The peak in 2021 and 2025 correlates with periods of high economic profit, while the trough in 2023 coincides with a reduction in economic profit. The invested capital generally increased throughout the period, but the economic spread ratio’s fluctuations indicate that increases in invested capital did not always translate into proportional increases in economic profit.

Relationship to Economic Profit
The economic spread ratio generally moves in tandem with economic profit. The largest increase in the ratio between 2020 and 2021 aligns with the most substantial increase in economic profit during the same period. Similarly, the decline in the ratio in 2023 corresponds with a significant decrease in economic profit. The projected increase in the ratio for 2025 is linked to a projected increase in economic profit.
Relationship to Invested Capital
While economic profit is the primary driver of the economic spread ratio, invested capital plays a moderating role. Invested capital consistently increased from 2020 to 2025. The ratio’s decline in 2023, despite continued growth in invested capital, suggests that the returns generated from the additional capital were insufficient to maintain the previous level of economic spread. The increase in invested capital in 2025, coupled with a substantial increase in economic profit, resulted in a strong recovery of the economic spread ratio.

Overall, the economic spread ratio indicates a dynamic relationship between profitability and capital deployment. The company’s ability to maintain a high economic spread ratio appears contingent on its capacity to generate substantial economic profit relative to its invested capital base.


Economic Profit Margin

Lam Research Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 29, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 25, 2023 Jun 26, 2022 Jun 27, 2021 Jun 28, 2020
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initial values demonstrate a substantial increase followed by a considerable decline, with a subsequent recovery projected in later years.

Economic Profit Margin Trend
In fiscal year 2020, the economic profit margin stood at 2.39%. This figure increased markedly to 14.45% in fiscal year 2021, and continued to rise to a peak of 16.65% in fiscal year 2022. A substantial decrease was then observed in fiscal year 2023, with the margin falling to 6.71%. The margin experienced a slight recovery to 2.36% in fiscal year 2024. Projections indicate a significant increase to 14.64% in fiscal year 2025, returning to levels comparable to those seen in 2021.

The economic profit margin’s movement closely mirrors the trend in economic profit. The large increase in economic profit between 2020 and 2022 directly correlates with the rise in the economic profit margin. The subsequent decline in economic profit in 2023 and 2024 is reflected in the corresponding decrease in the margin. The projected increase in economic profit for 2025 is similarly associated with the anticipated margin improvement.

Relationship to Adjusted Revenue
While adjusted revenue generally increased over the period, the economic profit margin did not consistently follow this trend. Revenue increased from US$10,132,858 thousand in 2020 to US$18,306,331 thousand in 2022. However, despite the revenue growth, the margin peaked in 2022 and then declined in 2023 as revenue decreased slightly. The projected revenue increase in 2025 is expected to coincide with a substantial margin improvement, suggesting a stronger relationship between revenue and profitability in that year.

The volatility in the economic profit margin suggests potential sensitivity to underlying cost structures or operational efficiencies. Further investigation into the factors driving these fluctuations would be beneficial.