EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Autodesk Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Autodesk Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | Jan 31, 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2024 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) and invested capital generally increased over the years, economic profit remained consistently negative, indicating the company did not generate returns exceeding its cost of capital throughout the analyzed timeframe.
- NOPAT Trend
- Net operating profit after taxes experienced substantial volatility. A significant increase is observed from 2019 to 2020, followed by a decrease in 2021. NOPAT recovered in 2022 and 2023, reaching a peak of US$1,402 million, before declining sharply in 2024 to US$493 million. This suggests potential cyclicality or the impact of specific business events on profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating between 21.92% and 22.68%. A slight upward trend is discernible towards the end of the period, increasing from 22.00% in 2022 to 22.44% in 2024. This incremental increase in the cost of capital may contribute to the widening negative economic profit in later years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased from US$4,412 million in 2019 to US$7,372 million in 2023, indicating growth in the company’s asset base. However, it experienced a slight decrease in 2024 to US$7,325 million. The consistent growth in invested capital, coupled with negative economic profit, suggests that capital deployment has not consistently generated adequate returns.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative in each year of the analyzed period. The largest negative economic profit occurred in 2019 at US$-945 million and again in 2024 at US$-1,151 million. While the magnitude of the loss decreased in 2020 and 2023, it remained substantial. The increasing negative economic profit in 2024, despite a relatively stable cost of capital, is primarily driven by the significant decline in NOPAT.
In summary, the company consistently failed to generate economic profit during the period. The fluctuations in NOPAT appear to be a primary driver of the changes in economic profit, while the cost of capital remained relatively consistent. The trend suggests a need to evaluate capital allocation strategies and operational efficiency to improve returns and achieve positive economic profit.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring and other exit costs reserve.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
6 2024 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2024 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest and investment income (expense), net = Adjusted interest and investment income (expense), net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
- Net Income (Loss)
-
The net income demonstrates significant fluctuations over the observed periods. Starting from a loss of US$81 million in January 2019, the company experienced a substantial turnaround, achieving a positive net income of US$215 million in January 2020. This upward trend accelerated noticeably in January 2021, reaching a peak of US$1,208 million. Subsequently, net income declined to US$497 million in January 2022 but rebounded to US$823 million in January 2023 and further increased to US$906 million by January 2024. The data suggests a period of recovery and growth following an initial loss, followed by some volatility, with the most recent figures indicating a strengthening profit position.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT shows a rising trend from January 2019 through January 2023, starting at US$41 million and climbing consistently to a peak of US$1,402 million in January 2023. After a low base in 2019, there was a rapid increase to US$1,197 million in 2020, followed by a decrease to US$833 million in January 2021. NOPAT then resumed growth with US$970 million in January 2022 and peaked notably in January 2023. However, in January 2024, NOPAT declined sharply to US$493 million. This pattern indicates periods of strong operational profitability, especially between 2020 and 2023, though the most recent year shows a significant reduction.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
The financial data indicates notable fluctuations in both the income tax provision (benefit) and cash operating taxes over the analyzed periods.
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
-
The income tax provision demonstrates considerable volatility throughout the periods. Initially, it increased from 38 million USD in 2019 to 80 million USD in 2020, indicating a rising tax expense. However, in 2021, there is a significant benefit recorded, reflected by a negative provision of -662 million USD, which represents a tax benefit rather than an expense. This sharp reversal may suggest extraordinary tax adjustments or recognition of deferred tax assets during that period. Subsequent years show a return to positive provisions, rising from 68 million USD in 2022 to 123 million USD in 2023, and reaching 230 million USD in 2024, indicating increased tax expenses once again. Overall, the income tax provision reflects uneven tax charges with an exceptional benefit in 2021 followed by increasing tax liabilities.
- Cash Operating Taxes
-
Cash operating taxes display a generally upward trend across the years, with some variation in magnitude. Starting at 64 million USD in 2019, cash taxes increased slightly to 82 million USD in 2020. A more substantial rise is seen in 2021 with 130 million USD, despite the negative income tax provision in the same year, suggesting a divergence between cash taxes paid and accounting tax charges. Cash taxes decreased to 100 million USD in 2022 but then surged significantly to 415 million USD in 2023 before declining to 310 million USD in 2024. This pattern indicates increasing cash tax outflows, peaking in 2023, which might reflect higher taxable income or changes in tax payment schedules.
In summary, the data reveal inconsistencies between accounting tax provisions and cash tax payments, particularly highlighted by the negative income tax provision in 2021 juxtaposed with rising cash operating taxes. The overall trend suggests increasing tax-related cash outflows in recent years, and significant fluctuations in tax accounting entries, which could be attributable to changes in tax regulations, one-time adjustments, or differences in timing between tax accruals and payments.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of restructuring and other exit costs reserve.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity (deficit).
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The financial data presents a mixed set of trends over the six-year period ending in January 2024. The following analysis focuses on the reported debt and leases, stockholders’ equity, and invested capital, highlighting significant movements and potential implications.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The debt and lease obligations experienced fluctuations over the period. Starting at 2,445 million USD in early 2019, the total increased slightly to 2,545 million USD by 2020, followed by a noticeable reduction to 2,105 million USD in 2021. However, debt levels surged again in 2022, reaching 3,060 million USD, which is the highest in the provided timeframe. Subsequently, it declined to 2,666 million USD in 2023 and further to 2,626 million USD in early 2024. The pattern suggests an overall cyclical adjustment in financing strategy, with a peak possibly reflecting increased borrowing or lease arrangements in 2022, and partial deleveraging thereafter.
- Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
- The stockholders’ equity profile shows a significant transformation from a deficit position to a positive equity base. At the start of 2019, equity was negative at -211 million USD, indicating liabilities exceeded assets. This deficit narrowed to -139 million USD in 2020 before turning positive at 966 million USD in 2021. Although there was a slight decrease to 849 million USD in 2022, the trend reversed with equity rising substantially to 1,145 million USD in 2023 and 1,855 million USD in 2024. This improvement demonstrates strengthening financial health, reflecting either retained earnings growth, capital injections, or asset revaluation effectively reducing the deficit and building shareholder value.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital steadily increased over the analyzed periods. Commencing at 4,412 million USD in 2019, it rose to 5,535 million USD in 2020, and 5,723 million USD in 2021. Growth accelerated in the following years, reaching 6,835 million USD in 2022, peaking at 7,372 million USD in 2023, and slightly declining to 7,325 million USD in 2024. The general upward movement of invested capital suggests ongoing investments in operations, fixed assets, or other long-term assets, supporting expansion or optimization strategies. The marginal drop in 2024 may reflect asset disposals or adjustments but does not significantly reverse the growth trend.
In summary, the company's financial structure demonstrates evolving leverage with a notable peak in debt in 2022, followed by partial reduction. Simultaneously, a transition from equity deficit to a positive and growing equity base indicates improving solvency and capital adequacy. Continuous increases in invested capital highlight sustained investment activity, supporting business growth and operational capacity enhancement.
Cost of Capital
Autodesk Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | Jan 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2024 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation between January 31, 2019, and January 31, 2024. While invested capital generally increased over the period, economic profit remained negative, resulting in consistently negative economic spread ratios.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- The economic spread ratio began at -21.43% in 2019, indicating a substantial shortfall in returns relative to the cost of capital. A significant improvement was observed in 2020, with the ratio increasing to -0.30%, suggesting a narrowing of the gap between returns and capital costs. However, this improvement was short-lived, as the ratio deteriorated to -8.13% in 2021 and -7.80% in 2022. A modest recovery occurred in 2023, with the ratio reaching -3.32%, before declining sharply to -15.71% in 2024. This final decrease represents the largest negative spread observed during the analyzed period.
- Relationship with Economic Profit
- The economic spread ratio’s movements closely mirrored those of economic profit. Years with larger negative economic profit values, such as 2019, 2021, 2022, and 2024, corresponded with more negative economic spread ratios. The relatively small negative economic profit in 2020 resulted in a significantly improved, though still negative, economic spread ratio.
- Invested Capital and Economic Spread
- Invested capital increased from US$4,412 million in 2019 to US$7,372 million in 2023, before decreasing slightly to US$7,325 million in 2024. Despite this overall increase in invested capital, the economic spread ratio did not consistently improve, indicating that the growth in capital was not effectively translating into higher returns exceeding the cost of capital. The substantial decline in the economic spread ratio in 2024, despite a relatively stable invested capital base, suggests a significant decrease in profitability relative to the capital employed.
Overall, the analysis reveals a consistent struggle to generate returns that cover the cost of capital. The fluctuations in the economic spread ratio highlight the volatility in the company’s ability to create economic value, with 2024 representing the most challenging year in terms of economic value creation during the observed timeframe.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | Jan 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net revenue | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted net revenue | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2024 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation between January 31, 2019, and January 31, 2024. While adjusted net revenue generally increased over this period, economic profit remained negative, impacting the economic profit margin.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at -34.94% in 2019, representing a substantial negative value. A significant improvement was observed in 2020, with the margin increasing to -0.40%. However, this improvement was short-lived, as the margin deteriorated to -11.23% in 2021 and remained relatively stable at -11.07% in 2022. A further improvement to -4.22% occurred in 2023, but the margin experienced a sharp decline in 2024, reaching -22.21%.
- Relationship to Adjusted Net Revenue
- Adjusted net revenue increased from US$2,706 million in 2019 to US$5,795 million in 2023, demonstrating growth. However, revenue decreased to US$5,181 million in 2024. Despite the overall revenue growth from 2019 to 2023, the consistently negative economic profit suggests that the company’s cost of capital was not adequately covered by its returns during most of the observed period. The substantial decline in the economic profit margin in 2024, coinciding with a decrease in adjusted net revenue, indicates a worsening of this situation.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit itself fluctuated significantly. Beginning at a loss of US$945 million in 2019, it improved dramatically to a loss of only US$17 million in 2020. It then worsened to a loss of US$465 million in 2021 and US$533 million in 2022. A reduction in the loss to US$244 million was seen in 2023, but the loss increased substantially to US$1,151 million in 2024. This pattern mirrors the fluctuations observed in the economic profit margin.
The data indicates a persistent challenge in generating returns exceeding the cost of capital. While revenue growth occurred, it was not sufficient to consistently translate into positive economic profit, and the recent trend suggests a potential worsening of this issue.