Stock Analysis on Net

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWD)

$24.99

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
Quarterly Data

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Jan 31, 2026 = ×
Oct 31, 2025 = ×
Jul 31, 2025 = ×
Apr 30, 2025 = ×
Jan 31, 2025 = ×
Oct 31, 2024 = ×
Jul 31, 2024 = ×
Apr 30, 2024 = ×
Jan 31, 2024 = ×
Oct 31, 2023 = ×
Jul 31, 2023 = ×
Apr 30, 2023 = ×
Jan 31, 2023 = ×
Oct 31, 2022 = ×
Jul 31, 2022 = ×
Apr 30, 2022 = ×
Jan 31, 2022 = ×
Oct 31, 2021 = ×
Jul 31, 2021 = ×
Apr 30, 2021 = ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-04-30).


The analysis reveals a significant evolution in the relationship between Return on Assets (ROA), Financial Leverage, and Return on Equity (ROE) over the observed period. Initially, the company exhibited negative ROE, driven by negative ROA, and amplified by substantial financial leverage. However, a clear trend towards improvement in these metrics emerges over time, although recent quarters suggest potential headwinds.

Return on Assets (ROA)
ROA consistently registered negative values from April 2021 through October 2022, peaking in negativity at -6.49% in January 2022. A gradual improvement is then observed, transitioning to positive territory by January 2023 (1.34%). This positive trend continues into April 2024 (2.36%), but reverses in subsequent quarters, falling back into negative values by January 2025 (-0.22%) and continuing to decline through July 2025 (-3.20%). The most recent observation in January 2026 shows a ROA of -1.47%.
Financial Leverage
Financial Leverage demonstrates relative stability throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range. It begins at 3.39 in April 2021 and peaks at 3.53 in January 2022. A consistent, albeit moderate, downward trend is then apparent, decreasing to 2.50 by January 2026. This suggests a deliberate or reactive reduction in the company’s reliance on debt financing.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE mirrors the trend of ROA, initially exhibiting substantial negative values, reaching -22.89% in January 2022. The improvement in ROA, coupled with the slight decrease in financial leverage, drives a significant increase in ROE, culminating in a positive value of 5.97% in July 2022. However, mirroring the recent ROA trend, ROE declines in subsequent quarters, becoming negative again by April 2025 (-7.91%) and remaining negative through January 2026 (-3.67%).

The interplay between these ratios indicates that the company’s initial struggles with profitability (negative ROA) were exacerbated by high financial leverage, resulting in substantial negative ROE. The subsequent improvement in ROE was largely attributable to the positive shift in ROA, with the reduction in financial leverage providing a secondary, supportive effect. The recent reversal in ROA, despite continued lower leverage, is now negatively impacting ROE, suggesting that operational efficiency or asset utilization is becoming a more significant concern.

The observed decline in ROA and ROE in the most recent quarters warrants further investigation to determine the underlying causes and potential implications for future performance. While the reduction in financial leverage is a positive development from a risk management perspective, it has not been sufficient to offset the impact of declining asset profitability.


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jan 31, 2026 = × ×
Oct 31, 2025 = × ×
Jul 31, 2025 = × ×
Apr 30, 2025 = × ×
Jan 31, 2025 = × ×
Oct 31, 2024 = × ×
Jul 31, 2024 = × ×
Apr 30, 2024 = × ×
Jan 31, 2024 = × ×
Oct 31, 2023 = × ×
Jul 31, 2023 = × ×
Apr 30, 2023 = × ×
Jan 31, 2023 = × ×
Oct 31, 2022 = × ×
Jul 31, 2022 = × ×
Apr 30, 2022 = × ×
Jan 31, 2022 = × ×
Oct 31, 2021 = × ×
Jul 31, 2021 = × ×
Apr 30, 2021 = × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-04-30).


The three-component DuPont analysis reveals a significant shift in the company’s Return on Equity (ROE) over the observed period. Initially, ROE is negative and declining, but demonstrates a marked improvement towards positive territory before experiencing renewed declines in later periods. This evolution is driven by changes in Net Profit Margin, Asset Turnover, and Financial Leverage.

Net Profit Margin
The Net Profit Margin exhibits a consistent negative trend from April 2021 to January 2022, reaching its most negative value in January 2022 at -16.18%. A substantial improvement is then observed, transitioning to positive values by January 2023 (2.92%). However, this positive trend reverses, with the margin declining back into negative territory by April 2025 and continuing to decrease through January 2026 (-3.38%). The volatility in this metric significantly influences overall ROE.
Asset Turnover
Asset Turnover demonstrates a generally increasing trend from 0.35 in April 2021 to a peak of 0.49 in October 2023. Following this peak, the ratio experiences a slight decline, stabilizing around 0.43-0.47 in the most recent periods. While relatively stable, the increasing trend initially contributes positively to ROE, and the subsequent stabilization prevents further gains.
Financial Leverage
Financial Leverage remains relatively stable in the initial period, fluctuating between 3.39 and 3.53 from April 2021 to April 2022. A clear downward trend emerges from April 2022 onwards, decreasing to 2.50 by January 2026. This reduction in leverage, while potentially indicating reduced financial risk, also contributes to the decline in ROE, particularly as Net Profit Margin weakens in later periods.

The initial negative ROE is primarily attributable to the consistently negative Net Profit Margin, despite increasing Asset Turnover and relatively high Financial Leverage. The subsequent improvement in ROE from 2022 onwards is largely driven by the positive shift in Net Profit Margin, which outweighs the moderating effect of declining Financial Leverage. The recent decline in ROE, observed from April 2024, is a result of the combined effect of a decreasing Net Profit Margin and a continuing downward trend in Financial Leverage, despite a stable Asset Turnover.

The interplay between these three components highlights the company’s sensitivity to profitability. While efficient asset utilization (Asset Turnover) provides some support, the ultimate driver of ROE is the ability to generate positive net income (Net Profit Margin). The decreasing use of financial leverage appears to be a strategic decision, but its impact on ROE is exacerbated by the recent decline in profitability.


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jan 31, 2026 = × × × ×
Oct 31, 2025 = × × × ×
Jul 31, 2025 = × × × ×
Apr 30, 2025 = × × × ×
Jan 31, 2025 = × × × ×
Oct 31, 2024 = × × × ×
Jul 31, 2024 = × × × ×
Apr 30, 2024 = × × × ×
Jan 31, 2024 = × × × ×
Oct 31, 2023 = × × × ×
Jul 31, 2023 = × × × ×
Apr 30, 2023 = × × × ×
Jan 31, 2023 = × × × ×
Oct 31, 2022 = × × × ×
Jul 31, 2022 = × × × ×
Apr 30, 2022 = × × × ×
Jan 31, 2022 = × × × ×
Oct 31, 2021 = × × × ×
Jul 31, 2021 = × × × ×
Apr 30, 2021 = × × × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-04-30).


The five-component DuPont analysis reveals a significant, albeit volatile, improvement in Return on Equity (ROE) over the observed period. Initially, the company experienced substantial negative ROE values, which gradually diminished before fluctuating again. This evolution is attributable to shifts in the underlying components of profitability, efficiency, and financial leverage.

Tax Burden
The tax burden exhibits considerable fluctuation. Initially absent, it becomes positive, peaking at 0.79 before experiencing a substantial negative swing to -0.98 and then -0.37. This volatility suggests significant changes in taxable income or applicable tax rates, impacting net income and consequently ROE. The later periods show a return to negative values, potentially indicating increased tax benefits or losses.
Interest Burden
The interest burden generally trends downwards, starting with missing values and then increasing to a peak of 0.87 before declining to 0.66. This suggests a decreasing proportion of earnings allocated to interest expense, potentially due to debt restructuring or improved profitability. The subsequent increase to 0.83 and then 0.89 may indicate increased borrowing or higher interest rates.
EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin demonstrates a clear upward trend, albeit with some volatility. Beginning with negative values around -10%, it steadily improves, reaching a peak of 6.77% before declining again to -4.45%. This improvement indicates enhanced operational efficiency and pricing power. The recent decline suggests potential cost pressures or increased competition. The initial negative margins significantly suppressed ROE.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover shows a modest, consistent increase from 0.35 to 0.49, indicating improved efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue. This suggests the company is becoming more effective at converting investments in assets into sales. The slight decline in later periods warrants monitoring, but the overall trend is positive.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage consistently declines from 3.39 to 2.50, indicating a reduction in the proportion of assets financed by debt. While leverage can amplify returns, its reduction suggests a more conservative capital structure. This decrease, combined with improvements in profitability, contributes to the overall improvement in ROE. The slight increase in the most recent periods may indicate a renewed appetite for debt financing.

The initial negative ROE was primarily driven by negative EBIT margins. As the EBIT margin improved, coupled with moderate increases in asset turnover and decreasing financial leverage, ROE moved towards positive territory. The volatility in tax burden introduces an element of uncertainty, but the overall trend suggests a strengthening financial position. The recent decline in EBIT margin and the slight increase in leverage require further investigation to determine their potential impact on future ROE performance.


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Jan 31, 2026 = ×
Oct 31, 2025 = ×
Jul 31, 2025 = ×
Apr 30, 2025 = ×
Jan 31, 2025 = ×
Oct 31, 2024 = ×
Jul 31, 2024 = ×
Apr 30, 2024 = ×
Jan 31, 2024 = ×
Oct 31, 2023 = ×
Jul 31, 2023 = ×
Apr 30, 2023 = ×
Jan 31, 2023 = ×
Oct 31, 2022 = ×
Jul 31, 2022 = ×
Apr 30, 2022 = ×
Jan 31, 2022 = ×
Oct 31, 2021 = ×
Jul 31, 2021 = ×
Apr 30, 2021 = ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-04-30).


The analysis of the presented financial metrics reveals a significant improvement in profitability and efficiency over the observed period. Initially, the company experienced negative returns, but a clear positive trend emerges in later quarters. This improvement is driven by changes in both net profit margin and asset turnover.

Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin demonstrates a consistent improvement from substantial negative values beginning in April 2021 to positive figures by January 2023. The margin fluctuates between approximately -16% and -9% in the earlier periods, reaching a low of -16.48% in October 2021. A notable shift occurs, with the margin steadily increasing to 2.92% by January 2023 and peaking at 4.84% in July 2023. Subsequent quarters show some volatility, declining to -6.88% by October 2025, but remaining significantly improved compared to the initial values. This indicates increasing profitability from core operations.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover exhibits a generally upward trend, indicating increasing efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue. Starting at 0.35 in April 2021, it rises to 0.46 by October 2022, representing a substantial increase in sales generated per dollar of assets. While there is some fluctuation, with a slight decrease to 0.45 in January 2025, the ratio generally remains above the initial level, hovering around 0.47-0.48 for several quarters. A slight decline to 0.43 is observed in the final period, but the overall trend remains positive.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The return on assets mirrors the improvements observed in the individual components. Beginning with negative ROA values, ranging from -5.50% to -6.49% in the initial periods, a clear upward trajectory is evident. ROA turns positive in January 2023, reaching 1.34%, and peaks at 2.36% in July 2023. Despite some subsequent decline, the ROA remains positive for several quarters before turning negative again in January 2025. The final reported ROA is -1.47%, still a significant improvement from the initial negative values. The positive correlation between the net profit margin and asset turnover is clearly reflected in the ROA trend.

In summary, the company demonstrates a successful transition from negative profitability to positive returns, driven by improvements in both operational efficiency and profitability. While recent quarters show some volatility, the overall trend indicates a strengthening financial position.


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Jan 31, 2026 = × × ×
Oct 31, 2025 = × × ×
Jul 31, 2025 = × × ×
Apr 30, 2025 = × × ×
Jan 31, 2025 = × × ×
Oct 31, 2024 = × × ×
Jul 31, 2024 = × × ×
Apr 30, 2024 = × × ×
Jan 31, 2024 = × × ×
Oct 31, 2023 = × × ×
Jul 31, 2023 = × × ×
Apr 30, 2023 = × × ×
Jan 31, 2023 = × × ×
Oct 31, 2022 = × × ×
Jul 31, 2022 = × × ×
Apr 30, 2022 = × × ×
Jan 31, 2022 = × × ×
Oct 31, 2021 = × × ×
Jul 31, 2021 = × × ×
Apr 30, 2021 = × × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-04-30).


The four-component DuPont analysis reveals a significant improvement in Return on Assets (ROA) over the observed period, transitioning from negative values to positive territory, although recent quarters show some moderation. This improvement is driven by changes in the EBIT Margin, Interest Burden, Tax Burden, and Asset Turnover. The analysis details a complex interplay between these factors.

EBIT Margin
The EBIT Margin demonstrates a consistent upward trend from negative 9.71% in April 2021 to 6.77% in July 2022. However, this positive momentum stalled, with the margin declining to -4.45% by October 2025. The most substantial gains occurred between January 2022 and July 2022. The recent decline suggests increasing cost pressures or decreasing revenue growth.
Asset Turnover
Asset Turnover exhibits a steady, albeit modest, increase from 0.35 in April 2021 to 0.49 in October 2023. Following this peak, it experienced a slight decrease to 0.43 by January 2026. This indicates a generally improving efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue, though the recent trend suggests a potential plateauing of this efficiency.
Interest Burden
The Interest Burden initially shows an increasing trend, rising from 0.32 in October 2022 to 0.89 in April 2022. It then decreased to 0.66 in January 2023 and further to -0.37 in October 2024. This fluctuation suggests changes in the company’s financing structure or interest rate environment. The negative value in October 2024 is unusual and warrants further investigation, potentially indicating income from interest-bearing assets exceeding interest expense.
Tax Burden
The Tax Burden is highly volatile. It begins with missing values for the initial periods, then shows a negative value of -0.98 in October 2023, followed by 0.73 in January 2024. It fluctuates between positive and negative values, ending at -0.20 in January 2026. This variability likely reflects changes in tax regulations, profitability, or the utilization of tax credits and losses. The negative values suggest tax benefits exceeding tax liabilities in those periods.

The initial improvement in ROA is largely attributable to the significant increase in the EBIT Margin, coupled with a moderate increase in Asset Turnover. The fluctuating Interest and Tax Burdens have a modulating effect on the overall ROA. The recent decline in EBIT Margin, combined with a slight decrease in Asset Turnover, raises concerns about the sustainability of the ROA improvement. The negative Tax Burden in certain periods provides a temporary boost, but its inconsistency makes it an unreliable contributor to long-term profitability.

Overall, the company demonstrated a positive trajectory in profitability and asset utilization, but recent trends suggest potential headwinds. Continued monitoring of the EBIT Margin and Asset Turnover is crucial to assess the long-term financial health of the organization.


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Jan 31, 2026 = × ×
Oct 31, 2025 = × ×
Jul 31, 2025 = × ×
Apr 30, 2025 = × ×
Jan 31, 2025 = × ×
Oct 31, 2024 = × ×
Jul 31, 2024 = × ×
Apr 30, 2024 = × ×
Jan 31, 2024 = × ×
Oct 31, 2023 = × ×
Jul 31, 2023 = × ×
Apr 30, 2023 = × ×
Jan 31, 2023 = × ×
Oct 31, 2022 = × ×
Jul 31, 2022 = × ×
Apr 30, 2022 = × ×
Jan 31, 2022 = × ×
Oct 31, 2021 = × ×
Jul 31, 2021 = × ×
Apr 30, 2021 = × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2025-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2024-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2023-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-04-30).


The disaggregation of net profit margin reveals a notable improvement in profitability metrics over the observed period, though recent quarters indicate a potential reversal of this trend. Initially, the company experienced significant losses, as evidenced by consistently negative net profit margins. However, a clear upward trajectory emerges from late 2022 through mid-2023, culminating in positive net profit margins. More recently, performance has deteriorated, with net profit margin declining in the latter half of 2023 and into the first half of 2025.

EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin demonstrates a similar pattern to the net profit margin, initially exhibiting substantial negative values. A consistent increase is observed from April 2021 to April 2023, indicating improved operational profitability. However, the EBIT margin then declines, becoming negative again by April 2025. This suggests that while operational performance initially improved, recent quarters have seen a weakening of core business profitability.
Tax Burden
The tax burden fluctuates considerably. Negative values in late 2022 and early 2023 suggest the realization of deferred tax assets or other tax benefits. The tax burden generally remains positive, but exhibits volatility, potentially influenced by changes in tax regulations or the company’s taxable income. The absence of values for the majority of the observed period limits comprehensive analysis of this metric.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remains consistently positive throughout the period for which values are available, indicating ongoing interest expense. While the interest burden initially increases, it decreases in later periods, potentially reflecting debt repayment or refinancing activities. Similar to the tax burden, the lack of earlier period values restricts a complete assessment of this metric’s trend.

The relationship between EBIT margin, tax burden, and interest burden directly impacts the net profit margin. The initial improvement in net profit margin correlates with the increase in EBIT margin, partially offset by the impact of the interest and tax burdens. The recent decline in net profit margin appears to be driven by the decreasing EBIT margin, with the tax and interest burdens contributing to the overall negative trend. Further investigation into the factors driving the recent decline in EBIT margin is warranted.

The volatility observed in the tax burden suggests potential non-recurring items impacting net income. A more detailed examination of the company’s tax filings would be necessary to understand the underlying drivers of these fluctuations. The consistent positive interest burden highlights the ongoing cost of debt financing, which should be considered in assessing the company’s overall financial health.